Half Back Flanker wrote:I speak with a gentleman who sits on this exact panel, and he advises me he never reads this site, and assures me, that anything written on any social media outlet would never compromise their position.
Puts that theory to bed doesn't it.
Well that's a little more reassuring isn't it.. imagine walking into a tribunal and the bloke says "G'day mate, we've read the allegations on safooty, no need for you to say anything we have already concluded you're guilty and can have 8 weeks suspension."
or "Hmm you say you're not guilty and wasn't intentional to strike, but old mate on safooty has claimed 'it was a dirty dog shot' therefore we find you guilty"