SA Footy

Nichdanmatt wrote:Pretty sure sailsbury north incident was all over the forum,but that’s ok is it

Pretty sure it wasn't. Only 3 pages of abusing Lisa because I wouldn't allow anyone to elaborate as to why they were in trouble.

So please keep arguing the point.

Footy Chick wrote:

Nichdanmatt wrote:Pretty sure sailsbury north incident was all over the forum,but that’s ok is it

Pretty sure it wasn't. Only 3 pages of abusing Lisa because I wouldn't allow anyone to elaborate as to why they were in trouble.

So please keep arguing the point.

It was on the news instead..

I wonder who it is this time???

Not good to hear from the kennel

Guilty & there gone

If it is true it’s a shame considering the hard work that has been done and the success so far.

Pity we can’t talk about is because someone who thinks they are a member of the gestapo will send us all on a holiday. No doubt it will play itself out.

Half Back Flanker wrote:If it is true it’s a shame considering the hard work that has been done and the success so far.

Pity we can’t talk about is because someone who thinks they are a member of the gestapo will send us all on a holiday. No doubt it will play itself out.

No you idiot, no talk on the incident here because it may influence the tribunal outcome. Similar to a court of law where you don't comment on criminal trials as it may influence the outcome.....

Love a rumour wrote:Guilty & there gone

Gone or just docked points?

Rather be gestapo than a bottom feeder.

Go ask your boyfriend why he took his FB announcement down about it. He said that tbey couldn't discuss it. Why dont you Go have a crack at him too then. Eh?

heater31 wrote:

Half Back Flanker wrote:If it is true it’s a shame considering the hard work that has been done and the success so far.

Pity we can’t talk about is because someone who thinks they are a member of the gestapo will send us all on a holiday. No doubt it will play itself out.

No you idiot, no talk on the incident here because it may influence the tribunal outcome. Similar to a court of law where you don't comment on criminal trials as it may influence the outcome.....

That’s why you use the word ‘alleged’ and they ‘could be facing up to ________’ as their sentence.

Unfortunately its more than that.

Firstly, not everyone here is smart enough to remember to use it.

Secondly, as well as the league, other news agencies tend to take posts straight off here and use them in their incorrect reporting. Sadly, Ive seen it done before.

I know WC has a vested interest here but as a club thats been in a fair share if shit itself, you have to ask yourself, do i want my bloke to have a fair trial, or are you happy fir any manner of story to ruin the players and the clubs reputation?

Footy Chick wrote:Rather be gestapo than a bottom feeder.

Go ask your boyfriend why he took his FB announcement down about it. He said that tbey couldn't discuss it. Why dont you Go have a crack at him too then. Eh?

Get off your f###en high horse. Still dirty on him aren’t ya. Maybe you two should kiss and make up. Then this world might be a happier place.

See, this is how dumb you are.

Im tryung to say that youre clearly having a crack at me for no reason because someone else has done the same thing elsewhere and you havent batted an eyelid at it because hes mate of yours.

Even after the perfectly reasonable explanation i just gave youre still pushing the point because you think it makes you look like a hero

Half Back Flanker wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:Rather be gestapo than a bottom feeder.

Go ask your boyfriend why he took his FB announcement down about it. He said that tbey couldn't discuss it. Why dont you Go have a crack at him too then. Eh?

Get off your f###en high horse. Still dirty on him aren’t ya. Maybe you two should kiss and make up. Then this world might be a happier place.

Sailing pretty close to the wind sunshine, either take in the instructions or have a holiday from here!

Footy Chick wrote:Unfortunately its more than that.

Firstly, not everyone here is smart enough to remember to use it.

Secondly, as well as the league, other news agencies tend to take posts straight off here and use them in their incorrect reporting. Sadly, Ive seen it done before.

I know WC has a vested interest here but as a club thats been in a fair share if shit itself, you have to ask yourself, do i want my bloke to have a fair trial, or are you happy fir any manner of story to ruin the players and the clubs reputation?

I havent said anything about it at all.. All I said was there was some big news to come out of another game - not sure how that is saying anything to ruin the player or the clubs reputation, or in fact give either of them an unfair trial. Don't beat your chest over nothing. Whilst it may impact West Croydon, you implying that is the only reason I posted is offensive and factually incorrect. Has more of an impact on the club battling for 6th place as they would be hoping for a deregistration similar to the SN situation. I was merely passing on some information I had received from my dear friends at the Den. The only clubs it wouldn't impact are the teams who finish 7th, 8th and 10th if they were to go down that path.

ramming23 wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:Unfortunately its more than that.

Firstly, not everyone here is smart enough to remember to use it.

Secondly, as well as the league, other news agencies tend to take posts straight off here and use them in their incorrect reporting. Sadly, Ive seen it done before.

I know WC has a vested interest here but as a club thats been in a fair share if shit itself, you have to ask yourself, do i want my bloke to have a fair trial, or are you happy fir any manner of story to ruin the players and the clubs reputation?

I havent said anything about it at all.. All I said was there was some big news to come out of another game - not sure how that is saying anything to ruin the player or the clubs reputation, or in fact give either of them an unfair trial. Don't beat your chest over nothing. Whilst it may impact West Croydon, you implying that is the only reason I posted is offensive and factually incorrect. Has more of an impact on the club battling for 6th place as they would be hoping for a deregistration similar to the SN situation. I was merely passing on some information I had received from my dear friends at the Den. The only clubs it wouldn't impact are the teams who finish 7th, 8th and 10th if they were to go down that path.

Won’t have an impact on the team in sixth as they won’t get enough prem points to overtake a team that may be on holiday.
Finals on the other hand may see some issues...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Q. wrote:

Love a rumour wrote:Guilty & there gone

Gone or just docked points?

I expect we will lose a few points.

Mr Beefy wrote:

Q. wrote:

Love a rumour wrote:Guilty & there gone

Gone or just docked points?

I expect we will lose a few points.

Beefy i noticed you have a D Newchurch playing for you? Is he the one who had a stint at Two Wells in 2003? must be in his late 30's by now

mighty hounds wrote:

Mr Beefy wrote:

Q. wrote:

Love a rumour wrote:Guilty & there gone

Gone or just docked points?

I expect we will lose a few points.

Beefy i noticed you have a D Newchurch playing for you? Is he the one who had a stint at Two Wells in 2003? must be in his late 30's by now

Could be he is 42!

From RFC facebook
Members, I'd like address some of the rumours eventuating from yesterdays game and to put everyone’s mind at ease. Most of you may know we had a player reported yesterday. For a start the report from the umpire reads a pretty low ranked offence. Yes we are subject to an Amended Affiliation Agreement with the league but any penalties as an extension of that are loss of premiership points – that’s it. There seems to be some who are attempting to unsettle our players and members by suggesting we may be getting suspended from the competition. We WILL be playing next Saturday and while we will accept any penalty from the league, we need to simply use this as a reminder that we need to be above reproach on AND off the field.