by LMA » Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:37 pm
by Snake_Eyes » Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:14 pm
joompin wrote:Snake_Eyes wrote:joompin wrote:Do you tackle people to get the ball??? i thought you tackled people to stop them disposing of the ball as OUZO said if you dont wanna get bumped or tackled nat von beurtou and the thunder birds are in need of a goal shooter! Blake Davis layed the tackle and i can garantee you there was no intention of injuring the player..Blake plays footy hard and very fair.. seriously i no your a f n lutheran but toughen up...
well, Mr Joompin. how about the bloke that decided to punch our skipper square on the chin?? Is that the way footy should be played?? Does that sound 'very hard and very fair' to you?? I am sure that our skipper doesnt think so with a couple of metal plates in this cheek!! I am sure the SAAFL will think not, since they are starting up an investigation at all...
But this is nothing knew to me, or most people on this forum. I remember playing you blokes 2 years ago, and yes, we got pumped, but even though we were down 10-15 goals, SOME people from north haven thought they would still go out to try an injury as many people as they can...
Sorry about getting full-on, but this topic really bugs me, dirty footballers should be rubbed out FOR LIFE, being tough is one thing, but being dirty snipers is just the wrong way to play, football, netball, doesnt matter...
well snake eyes, i got sent off in that game your talking about and it was after one of our players just got king hit in a manner your talking bout your captain recieving!!!
by bucketts » Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:38 pm
by bucketts » Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:42 pm
by Snake_Eyes » Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:04 pm
bucketts wrote:bloody soft college teams who cry foul everytime one of their players get injured. most of the times its an accident, tuffen up girls and get on with the game.
by bucketts » Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:16 pm
by bucketts » Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:21 pm
by Snake_Eyes » Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:48 am
bucketts wrote:who was the player?, if you have started something, you must know who this person is, i doubt whether the leauge could do anything about this, if there is a problem with this player i'm sure the club would sort this out
by zedman » Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:34 am
by heater31 » Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:02 am
zedman wrote:bucketts..maybe those stitches helped your general appearance out eh?
since when is alfc a college team??..news to me and the league i reckon
we had a guy king hit last year and wasnt reported..broke his cheekbone in 3 places so we did a report and the guy got 7 games..makes no difference if an ump see's it or he misses it..and investigation was conducted and the thug was found guilty and got what he deserved..do the crime do the time..perhaps bucketts instead of feigning such bravado your club should have reported it and gotten the thug out of the game ..hes probably done it again to someone else..most leopards dont change their spots
by zedman » Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:39 am
by Iron Fist » Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:41 am
zedman wrote:and we have an association with mercedes college..doesnt make kenilworth a college team..alfc also has a relationship with concordia college not just immanuel college but alfc is not a college team in your wildest dreams, both of those colleges are lutheran thats why there is a relationship of sorts..bucketts is inferring that if you are not a "district" team then you must be soft and a college team..feral mentality
by The Big Shrek » Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:46 am
Iron Fist wrote:zedman wrote:and we have an association with mercedes college..doesnt make kenilworth a college team..alfc also has a relationship with concordia college not just immanuel college but alfc is not a college team in your wildest dreams, both of those colleges are lutheran thats why there is a relationship of sorts..bucketts is inferring that if you are not a "district" team then you must be soft and a college team..feral mentality
Would u class SMOSH as a college team then zedman???
by Iron Fist » Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:57 am
The Big Shrek wrote:Iron Fist wrote:zedman wrote:and we have an association with mercedes college..doesnt make kenilworth a college team..alfc also has a relationship with concordia college not just immanuel college but alfc is not a college team in your wildest dreams, both of those colleges are lutheran thats why there is a relationship of sorts..bucketts is inferring that if you are not a "district" team then you must be soft and a college team..feral mentality
Would u class SMOSH as a college team then zedman???
I would class SPOC, Pembroke, PAOC, SMOSH, CBCOC and ALFC as soft. Scotch aren't soft, but they are the exception.
by Felch » Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:03 am
by Punk Rooster » Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:22 am
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by The Big Shrek » Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:34 am
Felch wrote:What a load of crap !
Depends what you class as soft i suppose. Most of the sides mentioned above usually are full of younger players, hence they are generally quick and play accordingly. Just because a team is quick and skillful, doesnt mean they are soft.
Stupid stereotype !!!
by heater31 » Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:41 am
The Big Shrek wrote:Felch wrote:What a load of crap !
Depends what you class as soft i suppose. Most of the sides mentioned above usually are full of younger players, hence they are generally quick and play accordingly. Just because a team is quick and skillful, doesnt mean they are soft.
Stupid stereotype !!!
When a team gets beaten because no one goes in for the hard ball they are soft. Regardless of what style a team plays, sometimes you just have to put your body on the line. A lot of college players aren't prepared to do this. It is a valid stereotype.
by Felch » Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:43 am
The Big Shrek wrote:Felch wrote:What a load of crap !
Depends what you class as soft i suppose. Most of the sides mentioned above usually are full of younger players, hence they are generally quick and play accordingly. Just because a team is quick and skillful, doesnt mean they are soft.
Stupid stereotype !!!
When a team gets beaten because no one goes in for the hard ball they are soft. Regardless of what style a team plays, sometimes you just have to put your body on the line. A lot of college players aren't prepared to do this. It is a valid stereotype.
by Iron Fist » Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:53 am
Felch wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:Felch wrote:What a load of crap !
Depends what you class as soft i suppose. Most of the sides mentioned above usually are full of younger players, hence they are generally quick and play accordingly. Just because a team is quick and skillful, doesnt mean they are soft.
Stupid stereotype !!!
When a team gets beaten because no one goes in for the hard ball they are soft. Regardless of what style a team plays, sometimes you just have to put your body on the line. A lot of college players aren't prepared to do this. It is a valid stereotype.
A lot of players from ALL clubs are not prepared to do this - unfair to just say college teams. I have seen so-called 'tough' sides get beaten because they won't put their head over the ball, but are quite willing to belt a guy behind play.
The toughest blokes i have played against and with are the ones who dont think they are tough - they just get the ball regardless.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |