by The Bedge » Thu Apr 17, 2025 11:45 am
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Brodlach » Thu Apr 17, 2025 12:14 pm
The Bedge wrote:Was he at Norwood on the Saturday? Thought I saw him sorting auskickers.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by gadj1976 » Thu Apr 17, 2025 12:51 pm
by The Bedge » Thu Apr 17, 2025 1:10 pm
gadj1976 wrote:This is all assuming that the people who do the scheduling are the same people running around during Gather Round?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Brodlach » Thu Apr 17, 2025 2:23 pm
gadj1976 wrote:This is all assuming that the people who do the scheduling are the same people running around during Gather Round?
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by The Bedge » Thu Apr 17, 2025 3:10 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Bedge » Tue Apr 29, 2025 6:19 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by locky801 » Tue Apr 29, 2025 6:29 pm
The Bedge wrote:SANFL Jnrs is an absolute rabble.
******* shit show
by jo172 » Wed Apr 30, 2025 9:32 am
The Bedge wrote:SANFL Jnrs is an absolute rabble.
******* shit show
by The Bedge » Wed Apr 30, 2025 9:52 am
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by wenchbarwer » Wed Apr 30, 2025 10:09 am
by Spargo » Wed Apr 30, 2025 10:42 am
by wenchbarwer » Wed Apr 30, 2025 10:50 am
Spargo wrote:Youngest daughter has gone up to U-14’s this year (as has most of this year’s team) so they’ll be playing against a lot of kids a year older, I get that. The wheel turns next year. This was on display with the opposition last Sunday, they were noticeably talker & bigger. The 23 goal margin reflected this. What irks me is we were told by someone in the know that the opposition had a number of U-16’s playing in that side as well & it had been ok’d by the league as they wouldn’t have had enough to field a side this season. Surely that’s a case of “too bad”???
by MW » Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:29 am
by wenchbarwer » Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:32 am
MW wrote:The day that 16 year old playing in an U14 league severely injures a 14 year old, it will stop. Should not have to wait until then though. Going through the SAAFL juniors for girls over the last 10 years I have no confidence they will fix it.
by MW » Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:33 am
by wenchbarwer » Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:43 am
MW wrote:Spargo said that happened. I have seen it happen also with my daughter.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:49 am
MW wrote:Spargo said that happened. I have seen it happen also with my daughter.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:51 am
wenchbarwer wrote:MW wrote:Spargo said that happened. I have seen it happen also with my daughter.
U16 players can mean girls are currently 14, 15 or 16, he did mention that they were U16.
Anyway, that's semantics, you would hope the governing body would take all this into account
by MW » Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:52 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |