SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2009)

[Hairy_Cat]

Well well
Hairy Cat better shut up a bit
I have seen what they paid in 2006 in fact i still have the payments on paper
Also know some of their players payments from this year
Hairy Cat needs to shut his mouth and his rumours at least i have proof on a Walkerville letter head
Which i am more than willing to share

well well well
seems I've rattled a few cages
seems those at Kilburn have taken offence when the only point I was trying to make was that Salisbury would stay in Div 3
I have never denied people at WFC get paid, never
I never suggested that certain Kilburn players get paid certain amounts, matter of fact I have never suggested anything when it comes to Kilburn payer payments
I merely stated that any money Kilburn spent in an attempt to return to Div 2 would not have been wasted if what I said was correct, that they get promoted to Div 2

[The Big Shrek]

Well well
Hairy Cat better shut up a bit
I have seen what they paid in 2006 in fact i still have the payments on paper
Also know some of their players payments from this year
Hairy Cat needs to shut his mouth and his rumours at least i have proof on a Walkerville letter head
Which i am more than willing to share

well well well
seems I've rattled a few cages
seems those at Kilburn have taken offence when the only point I was trying to make was that Salisbury would stay in Div 3
I have never denied people at WFC get paid, never
I never suggested that certain Kilburn players get paid certain amounts, matter of fact I have never suggested anything when it comes to Kilburn payer payments
I merely stated that any money Kilburn spent in an attempt to return to Div 2 would not have been wasted if what I said was correct, that they get promoted to Div 2

What a load of poo Hairy Cat!

You said, looks like all that money Kilburn won't be wasted. The clear implication was that Kilburn spent a lot of money. Especially in the context of this forum where there have been many attacks at Kilburn on this topic.

Nice effort at backpedalling by the way.

[zedman]

i think we need a dead cat bounce..

[Iron Fist]

Well well
Hairy Cat better shut up a bit
I have seen what they paid in 2006 in fact i still have the payments on paper
Also know some of their players payments from this year
Hairy Cat needs to shut his mouth and his rumours at least i have proof on a Walkerville letter head
Which i am more than willing to share

well well well
seems I've rattled a few cages
seems those at Kilburn have taken offence when the only point I was trying to make was that Salisbury would stay in Div 3
I have never denied people at WFC get paid, never
I never suggested that certain Kilburn players get paid certain amounts, matter of fact I have never suggested anything when it comes to Kilburn payer payments
I merely stated that any money Kilburn spent in an attempt to return to Div 2 would not have been wasted if what I said was correct, that they get promoted to Div 2

What a load of poo Hairy Cat!

You said, looks like all that money Kilburn won't be wasted. The clear implication was that Kilburn spent a lot of money. Especially in the context of this forum where there have been many attacks at Kilburn on this topic.

Nice effort at backpedalling by the way.

from someone new to div 3
it sound alot like u were implying kilburn spent a shit load of cash!

on the topic of walkerville players
the ruckman they had when we played them in a trial last season, is he on coin??
what sort?? cause he was a great player!!!

[Pag]

Common knowlegde 151, as the blokes "not" receiving the payments blabbed, didn't they?

Yes 151, remember Willow told everyone he was on $2000 a game. Jeez, FC I thought you had tired of spreading silly rumours.

It was 'common knowledge' that Kilburn spent $425 000 on players because everyone still hates Kilburn from back in the day and loves to spread rumours about us.

I heard they paid for your swamp out near Mawson Lakes.

Yep, they bought me a property. Imagine what they'll spend on someone who can play! It will be funny during the next year when I hear the $425 000 figure quoted back to me by other teams.

FC, who did you hear blab about what they are getting paid? Oh, wait! You heard it from someone who heard it from someone. Yes of course we pay players. Name me a team in div 3 that doesn't(Shut up about Salisbury Pag!)?

Hey Shrek, Salisbury don't pay players.

[Hairy_Cat]

Well well
Hairy Cat better shut up a bit
I have seen what they paid in 2006 in fact i still have the payments on paper
Also know some of their players payments from this year
Hairy Cat needs to shut his mouth and his rumours at least i have proof on a Walkerville letter head
Which i am more than willing to share

well well well
seems I've rattled a few cages
seems those at Kilburn have taken offence when the only point I was trying to make was that Salisbury would stay in Div 3
I have never denied people at WFC get paid, never
I never suggested that certain Kilburn players get paid certain amounts, matter of fact I have never suggested anything when it comes to Kilburn payer payments
I merely stated that any money Kilburn spent in an attempt to return to Div 2 would not have been wasted if what I said was correct, that they get promoted to Div 2

What a load of poo Hairy Cat!

You said, looks like all that money Kilburn won't be wasted. The clear implication was that Kilburn spent a lot of money. Especially in the context of this forum where there have been many attacks at Kilburn on this topic.

Nice effort at backpedalling by the way.

from someone new to div 3
it sound alot like u were implying kilburn spent a s***t load of cash!

on the topic of walkerville players
the ruckman they had when we played them in a trial last season, is he on coin??
what sort?? cause he was a great player!!!

Not my fault that people interpreted the word ALL as to mean A LOT or S**T LOAD OF CASH. Seems that people are a little touchy about it all. Personally I have never received 10 cents for playing for my club, I actually pay $5 a week to play. These people that get paid will come and go but it's the club men who'll be there for the highs and lows. Love of the game, that's why I play it.

As for the ruckman who played well in a trial game, who was the game against?

[Felch]

Portland

[The Big Shrek]

Load of crap Cat! You know exactly what you were saying. Why would you even make a comment about money if you didn't think Kilburn were spending more than other teams. Would you have said "Looks like all the money Iggies spent wasn't wasted" if Iggies finished third?

It was interpreted just as you wanted it to be. Now you are backpedalling because we all know that Walkies spent up big.

As for you not getting paid, I don't know what grade you play but a lot of the A graders get upset when they bust their guts for free and some underperforming 'stars' of the team get all the money. It's causing a lot of division in your club.

[151]

Cant back you up Shrek
Just got told off by you know who
But i have just recruited our leader of the girls cheer squad next year
Yippeeee

[Pag]

I wouldn't know anything about what Walkerville spend, but for what it's worth, the couple of Kilburn guys I spoke to during the year (besides Shrek, who isn't worth any money) weren't getting near what I thought they'd be on. Not naming names, but fair players both of them.

Anyway, who really cares, we've got something Kilburn don't. A footy trip. And with that I'm off to Geelong for a few days, hope this place won't miss me too much...

[Hairy_Cat]

Load of crap Cat! You know exactly what you were saying. Why would you even make a comment about money if you didn't think Kilburn were spending more than other teams. Would you have said "Looks like all the money Iggies spent wasn't wasted" if Iggies finished third?

It was interpreted just as you wanted it to be. Now you are backpedalling because we all know that Walkies spent up big.

As for you not getting paid, I don't know what grade you play but a lot of the A graders get upset when they bust their guts for free and some underperforming 'stars' of the team get all the money. It's causing a lot of division in your club.

If you want to talk about money we will, do you think any of the other 9 teams in Div 3 in 2008 paid players more than Kilburn did? I think we can automatically rule most of the teams out. The only team I think that would even come close to Kilburn MIGHT be Flinders but I doubt it. You can't honestly deny that Kilburn have a number of paid players, some on decent money. Why would the likes of Wilson, who as we all know played SANFL, play for Kilburn if he wasn't offered decent money? He could have gone it else where and got good money. Why would the likes of Pete Lesley leave a country league to play at Kilburn? I'm sure you'll come up with some good "reasons" but at the end of the day, I think you would find that most people on here would say Kilburn would pay more than the other teams.

I played A Grade last season and have played over 100 A Grade games for the club. As for your line about underperforming players causing division at the club, 3 of the recruits to the club deservingly finished in the top 5 in the B&F. There is always going to be a little bit of sniping at a club when recruits come in on cash but last season I believe our recruits were an asset to the club. This may not have been the case in some years but it definitely was last year.

[boozehound]

I'm betting Salisbury will stay in Div 3 next season. As we all know Townies are off to the SFL and Scotch and SMOSH have told the SAAFL that they don't want to stay in Div 2. So, Flinders and Eastern Park will go up and I bet Kilburn will jump at the opportunity to return to Div 2. Seems all that money spent won't be a waste after all...[/quote]

Eastern park prob would want to go back down, the players that got them there i have heard are leaving[/quote]


Who's leaving hanno??? Cmon spill the beans?

[boozehound]

Hairy cat, I love the assumption that the "true club men" play for nothing....getting paid to play is so common these days simply because of the time involved in playing footy (training, playing, fucntions) Is it unreasonable to be compensated for that?

I know a heap of blokes who get remunerated quite well by there club, however are fantastic around the club, been there for years, played fantastic footy, etc, etc. Does this not make them true club men?

[Footy Chick]

Hairy cat, I love the assumption that the "true club men" play for nothing....getting paid to play is so common these days simply because of the time involved in playing footy (training, playing, fucntions) Is it unreasonable to be compensated for that?

I know a heap of blokes who get remunerated quite well by there club, however are fantastic around the club, been there for years, played fantastic footy, etc, etc. Does this not make them true club men?

It depends.. blokes who claim to be and are termed "good club men" by peers but puts the club up to ransom and threatens to leave if he dóesn't get his way? Good club man? I think not...

[The Big Shrek]

I'm not talking about Klemasz or Cannane although they are undoubtabley on good coin. I'm talking about a few coach's favourites that get paid well above what they're worth, and get named in the best to save face.

[boozehound]

Hairy cat, I love the assumption that the "true club men" play for nothing....getting paid to play is so common these days simply because of the time involved in playing footy (training, playing, fucntions) Is it unreasonable to be compensated for that?

I know a heap of blokes who get remunerated quite well by there club, however are fantastic around the club, been there for years, played fantastic footy, etc, etc. Does this not make them true club men?

It depends.. blokes who claim to be and are termed "good club men" by peers but puts the club up to ransom and threatens to leave if he dóesn't get his way? Good club man? I think not...

Not what i was saying at all FC just the club pays them what they are worth...fair isn't it. You dont have to go without completely to be a good club is all i am saying. A good club should pay ALL of there players what they are worth, if they are worth a $20 beer card then so be it....

The blokes I am referring to are worth what they are getting however the way footy works these days could get more elsewhere. they know the club is not trying to rip them off so they do the right thing in return. Clubs demand a lot of committment these days from A grade footballers so the saying "good old days when blokes played for the love of it" becomes a little irrelevant....we all have to move with the times...

[The Big Shrek]

You've been writing to much sensible shit lately boozehound. The above post is spot on. Now get back to talking smack.

[kingbeer]

hey hanno whats this i hear waterhouse is keen for a run at para hills next year

[Footy Chick]

Not what i was saying at all FC just the club pays them what they are worth...fair isn't it. You dont have to go without completely to be a good club is all i am saying. A good club should pay ALL of there players what they are worth, if they are worth a $20 beer card then so be it....

The blokes I am referring to are worth what they are getting however the way footy works these days could get more elsewhere. they know the club is not trying to rip them off so they do the right thing in return. Clubs demand a lot of committment these days from A grade footballers so the saying "good old days when blokes played for the love of it" becomes a little irrelevant....we all have to move with the times...

Sorry matey, I realise that but I was just trying to get across the fact that there are blokes like I described out there, they just take, take, take.. yet everyone worships the ground they walk on.

[backflanker08]

With Flynny and Hanno up forward, Clive would have to come back thru the 2's to prove himself