SA Footy

kickittome wrote:

jackpot jim wrote:Victor Harbor only 1 goal between their A and B Grade
does this say how good Willunga are or just how bad Victor are gonna be this season ?

4 goals total across all 4 grades! Very concerning for Victor who normally have pretty good numbers across all grades.
Heard that Willunga had to top them up in the senior colts can anyone confirm the amount they needed to help Victor fill a team?
Something seriously gone wrong at Victor if this is the case.

Down the Hill wrote:Each league is allocated 15 points per club so GSFL is 150 points. They then distribute points accordingly and this is how equalisation policies can be put in place to give clubs less than 15 and some clubs more. For example, in 2021 Langhorne Creek has 9 points and Yank have 18 points.

The GSFL would definitely be contravening SACFL Rules if they allowed more than 150 points across the league hence why their only solution, which may still be a contravention, is to run with the alternative.

I didn't think where a player lives has any relevance to what points they are allocated. And if it did then the GSFL shouldn't have to be sending that message to clubs.

Dutchy wrote:

Down the Hill wrote:Each league is allocated 15 points per club so GSFL is 150 points. They then distribute points accordingly and this is how equalisation policies can be put in place to give clubs less than 15 and some clubs more. For example, in 2021 Langhorne Creek has 9 points and Yank have 18 points.

The GSFL would definitely be contravening SACFL Rules if they allowed more than 150 points across the league hence why their only solution, which may still be a contravention, is to run with the alternative.

I didn't think where a player lives has any relevance to what points they are allocated. And if it did then the GSFL shouldn't have to be sending that message to clubs.

Ah that makes sense, wasn't aware of how it worked at a high level. Is the GSFL making its own rules then in this case?

field of dreams wrote:

Dutchy wrote:

Down the Hill wrote:Each league is allocated 15 points per club so GSFL is 150 points. They then distribute points accordingly and this is how equalisation policies can be put in place to give clubs less than 15 and some clubs more. For example, in 2021 Langhorne Creek has 9 points and Yank have 18 points.

The GSFL would definitely be contravening SACFL Rules if they allowed more than 150 points across the league hence why their only solution, which may still be a contravention, is to run with the alternative.

I didn't think where a player lives has any relevance to what points they are allocated. And if it did then the GSFL shouldn't have to be sending that message to clubs.

Ah that makes sense, wasn't aware of how it worked at a high level. Is the GSFL making its own rules then in this case?

Not quite the case. In the past the GSFL points have been allocated based on the average wins over the last 3 seasons.

0-3: 17 points
4-6: 15 Points
7-9: 13 points
10-12: 11 points
13-15: 9 points
16-17: 7 points
18: 5 points

eg the total points allocated in recent years:

2019 126
2020 124

not sure how they are factoring in 2020 (half season) though.

Round 1 points:
LC: 4 of 9
Ya: 18 of 18 (with a colt at -1)
MC: 11 of 11 (with a colt at -1. Perhaps the player is Haniford. 1 point yet was new in 2020?)
Go: 14 of 17
My: 8 of 17 (with a colt at -1)
McL 10 of 11
St: 13 of 13
EB: 4 of 13
Wi: 4 of 11
VH: 0 of 13

mutton cove wrote:grasshopper. Haniford was 3 points last season so should be 2 points this season. Mt Compass still played a senior colt last Saturday who became a -1 point so they could play Haniford and they still have a points players in the B's. Can we expect another Friday night call. Don't go out and buy players you can't fit into your points and expect to get exemptions.

shoe boy wrote:

mutton cove wrote:grasshopper. Haniford was 3 points last season so should be 2 points this season. Mt Compass still played a senior colt last Saturday who became a -1 point so they could play Haniford and they still have a points players in the B's. Can we expect another Friday night call. Don't go out and buy players you can't fit into your points and expect to get exemptions.

The player would be M Scrypek ? ( he must of bought a caravan and parked it at Compass thus his home )

Smashed Crab wrote:while Victor could be struggling - although I have heard they’ve met/or are meeting with James Boyd and Seb Guilhaus. Considering the League just approved a $5000 loan for the club, they must’ve found $20k+ in the back pocket if they’re looking at recruiting these two.


We have our own Damien Barrett reporting in the GSFL. Clearances pending for the above. They'll help reduce the deficit, but Boyd wouldnt be a great mentor for the young kids coming through

scottroo wrote:If he was cleared after April one last year he should be 3 points this year

field of dreams wrote:I guess the dogs could ask how Sellar was 4 points in 2018, 3 in 2019.... then 1 in 2020 and zero this year?

limb wrote:

field of dreams wrote:I guess the dogs could ask how Sellar was 4 points in 2018, 3 in 2019.... then 1 in 2020 and zero this year?

I would suggest that they might first like to familiarise themselves with the rules of the Player Points System on the GSFL website: https://websites.sportstg.com/assoc_pag ... sID=163944

8.6.2. A registered player who achieves 25 Matches (without transferring) for the same Affiliated League Club will reduce one (1) additional point the following season after achieving 25 Matches.

Smashed Crab wrote:while Victor could be struggling - although I have heard they’ve met/or are meeting with James Boyd and Seb Guilhaus. Considering the League just approved a $5000 loan for the club, they must’ve found $20k+ in the back pocket if they’re looking at recruiting these two.


We have our own Damien Barrett reporting in the GSFL. Clearances pending for the above. They'll help reduce the deficit, but Boyd wouldnt be a great mentor for the young kids coming through