River Murray Football League talk

Talk on any country footy league or club from the SA Country area

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby anzacspirit » Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:21 pm

mannum are in a tough situation we can't seem to please everyone. We would love to not have to bring in players and use that money on the club, however when you lose over a dozen A grade players over the last two years for us to remain competitive we need to get others in. If we aren't competetive then the townspeople will lose interest and we will also lose sponsors it is a double edged sword. Maybe the RMFL should make it that only locals can play for each team, no one outside of the respective towns can play, would that make it fairer? How does everyone propose to make this competition fairer for ALL clubs, stop having a go at Mannum and start coming up with ideas. Geez it's hard pleasing you guys ;)
anzacspirit
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:34 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Mannum

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby RyderCourtney » Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:25 pm

anzacspirit wrote:mannum are in a tough situation we can't seem to please everyone. We would love to not have to bring in players and use that money on the club, however when you lose over a dozen A grade players over the last two years for us to remain competitive we need to get others in. If we aren't competetive then the townspeople will lose interest and we will also lose sponsors it is a double edged sword. Maybe the RMFL should make it that only locals can play for each team, no one outside of the respective towns can play, would that make it fairer? How does everyone propose to make this competition fairer for ALL clubs, stop having a go at Mannum and start coming up with ideas. Geez it's hard pleasing you guys ;)


Well i never have liked the Murray Bridge teams so lets get rid of them and then play amoungst ourselves ;)

We could even keep it a top 5 so everyone plays finals and everyone is happy :lol:
User avatar
RyderCourtney
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:31 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby biffboy » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:05 pm

anzacspirit wrote:mannum are in a tough situation we can't seem to please everyone. We would love to not have to bring in players and use that money on the club, however when you lose over a dozen A grade players over the last two years for us to remain competitive we need to get others in. If we aren't competetive then the townspeople will lose interest and we will also lose sponsors it is a double edged sword. Maybe the RMFL should make it that only locals can play for each team, no one outside of the respective towns can play, would that make it fairer? How does everyone propose to make this competition fairer for ALL clubs, stop having a go at Mannum and start coming up with ideas. Geez it's hard pleasing you guys ;)

I think what Mannum need to concentrate on is finding a way to stop losing local players or even recruits who only hang around for a year or two. It's crucial to keep these guys happy as they're the ones who put money over the bar and help create a social atmosphere around a club.
When a player is lost, they blame other clubs and the cash on offer when really they are digging their own hole. Why would a local play for nothing knowing that there are guys earning massive $ who don't train as they should and get in there car and head back to town after the game. Clive Waterhouse is a perfect example of this and he has created a lot of Mannums problems as it stands.
I don't know how you would stop these players leaving, maybe better incentive awards or more of them instead of stuffing more money into over paid players from town who play for cash not the club.
Jervois are in a similar boat and Ladhams has dug them a hole, hopefully Coulter can pull them out of that as he seems well liked and respected amongst the group.
As for the $30k loan it has me a bit miffed, but I don't know all the facts so won't comment.
I just hope All the clubs can get through the tough times as I would hate to see the league disappear. The points system is OK and fair, we just got lucky as we had a freak group of locals come through at the right time just as the points system was introduced. Maybe other teams should get a few extra points, I just don't see how using them all on old players past their best will ever work for a team in the long run.
biffboy
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 10:03 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 9 times
Grassroots Team: Ramblers

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby anzacspirit » Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:01 pm

I'm not sure why the club getting a loan is even an issue to everyone else, it is being used to upgrade the premises which is all part of a larger plan to make the MFC strong off the field. I would doubt many of the RMFL clubs would have a large bankroll to call upon and pay for things to get done. Would our club be begrudged if we applied were allocated sporting grants? There is nothing stopping any other club applying for interest free loans in an attempt to improve their own club. As for your comments re keeping local players biffboy I couldn't agree more and we are working on those incentives to keep people at the club. The reasons for people leaving are varied, obviously many have followed quinny, some have retired others have moved on to other parts of the state. We really want to improve on our junior development and retaining the great kids we have coming through and we are implementing things this season to improve on that as well.
anzacspirit
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:34 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Mannum

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby biffboy » Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:15 pm

No one would have an issue with the loan if it weren't for the $100k spent a year on players. Clubs like Mannum say they can't compete financially with imps or ramblers but I can tell you we would kill to have that kinda cash to spend.
biffboy
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 10:03 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 9 times
Grassroots Team: Ramblers

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby Monopoly Man » Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:30 pm

From the outside it looks like Mannum are just doing good business in securing the loan. Its never good to lose local players but honestly, the players Mannum have lost are hardly capable of taking them to the top so recruits are a must. I think Biffboy is right though re Waterhouse, Mannum look to have paid the price with Quinn and co due to that. On the other side of the coin though Mueller and Hall have been great recruits for them that have stayed a while.
Monopoly Man
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:38 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 6 times

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby anzacspirit » Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:12 pm

biffboy wrote:No one would have an issue with the loan if it weren't for the $100k spent a year on players. Clubs like Mannum say they can't compete financially with imps or ramblers but I can tell you we would kill to have that kinda cash to spend.


i'm not sure who is saying we can't compete financially , we certainly don't have the great depth of players that the two bridge teams have, if we did then we wouldn't be forking out for players.
anzacspirit
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:34 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Mannum

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby Moleman » Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:10 am

Goldberg wrote:Some really interesting things going on in the world of RMFL this week!!

Mid Murray Council have given the Mannum footy club $42600 in interest free loans in the past 5 years which 1 councillor responded to by saying & I quote "I see from their balance sheet that the Mannum Football Club does quite well, & is paying close to $100,000 to players each year. We need to stop giving funds to football clubs who pay professional players when they have the earning capacity to fix their own facilities. Why dont they cut some players? After all they haven't won a premiership in 10 years & could afford to pay for it themselves"

The second is the greed & total disrespect the RMFL has for any heritage of the game. Own New leagues Best & fairest is now to be called the Murray Valley Standard Medal. Obviously some sort of deal has been done, & once again the leagues finest minds have put $$$$$$$ in front of what is right.

RMFL have a 7 team league & 5 play finals for revenue only, as the set up is the laughing stock of the states footy
RMFL allow loop holes for some clubs to exploit & say its for the betterment of the league, but really its so these same heads can go to interleague meetings & say "We have Andrew McLoad playing in our league"
RMFL back down at the first sign of trouble, & don't stand behind our tribuneral

I think its time that the League committee remembered that they are in a position or roll, to serve the clubs, not the other way around!! I wonder if the Medal name change even went to a vote by the 7 clubs, & if it did, were those seven clubs delegates given the opportunity to go to their members & ask for opinions, because thats the way it is supposed to work isn't it?????


"It was put to the club delegates and it was a unanimous decision."

Voted unanimously by club delegates – I suppose it is up to club delegates to vote on behalf of their members interests.
One club abstained from voting – maybe they weren’t prepared to vote without more feedback from their members, an option other clubs have at their disposal.
Moleman
Mini-League
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:53 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Tailem Bend

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby Goldberg » Fri Feb 01, 2013 10:28 am

One club abstained from voting – maybe they weren’t prepared to vote without more feedback from their members, an option other clubs have at their disposal.

Perfect!!! Someone gets what I was meaning. From what I can gather, the Vote was "Sprung" on the delegates, & MAYBE only 1 had the wisdom/strength to say "Hey maybe I should get the opinion of my club before voting on this" Which is the way it should be handled.

Thats why I put in my last sentence "Were those delegates given the opportunity to speak to their members" & I think the answer is NO. They were put under pressure to vote that meeting.
Goldberg
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1345
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 11:36 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby Look Good In Leather » Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:43 pm

Mr_Willy wrote:I also found the article about Mannum very interesting.... My first reaction was similar to that councillor - they can afford to pay out all this money in player payments but need to borrow money from the council to upgrade the clubrooms - something smells funny!! You did miss the rest of the quote though Goldberg about the gun players being good for the young guys at the club... Would be more interesting to see what some non football Mannum residents think of that sort of money going to a football club paying out so much to players.


As for the Standard Medal - not a big fan of that being changed either - it's been the mail medal for something like 80 years!! - but I'm sure in the article it did say that the vote had gone back to all the clubs and it was decided then to change it...


Probably not necessarily a bad thing, currently the medal is named after a city paper (The Sunday Mail) and instead will be named after the local paper that actually covers the league.
User avatar
Look Good In Leather
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2074
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:50 am
Has liked: 151 times
Been liked: 288 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby Bustarhyme » Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:35 pm

[quote="biffboy"][quote="anzacspirit"]mannum are in a tough situation we can't seem to please everyone. We would love to not have to bring in players and use that money on the club, however when you lose over a dozen A grade players over the last two years for us to remain competitive we need to get others in. If we aren't competetive then the townspeople will lose interest and we will also lose sponsors it is a double edged sword. Maybe the RMFL should make it that only locals can play for each team, no one outside of the respective towns can play, would that make it fairer? How does everyone propose to make this competition fairer for ALL clubs, stop having a go at Mannum and start coming up with ideas. Geez it's hard pleasing you guys ;)[/quote]
I think what Mannum need to concentrate on is finding a way to stop losing local players or even recruits who only hang around for a year or two. It's crucial to keep these guys happy as they're the ones who put money over the bar and help create a social atmosphere around a club.
When a player is lost, they blame other clubs and the cash on offer when really they are digging their own hole. Why would a local play for nothing knowing that there are guys earning massive $ who don't train as they should and get in there car and head back to town after the game. Clive Waterhouse is a perfect example of this and he has created a lot of Mannums problems as it stands.
I don't know how you would stop these players leaving, maybe better incentive awards or more of them instead of stuffing more money into over paid players from town who play for cash not the club.
Jervois are in a similar boat and Ladhams has dug them a hole, hopefully Coulter can pull them out of that as he seems well liked and respected amongst the group.
As for the $30k loan it has me a bit miffed, but I don't know all the facts so won't comment.
I just hope All the clubs can get through the tough times as I would hate to see the league disappear. The points system is OK and fair, we just got lucky as we had a freak group of locals come through at the right time just as the points system was introduced. Maybe other teams should get a few extra points, I just don't see how using them all on old players past their best will ever work for a team in the long run.[/quote]

I agree biffboy, the RMFL is a great comp and the struggling clubs do need to endeavour to recruit blokes who will hang around for longer than 1 or 2 years. Recruiting is clearly a lot more difficult than what it seems in the current footy climate. Players past their best and young players with a handful of reserves games are asking big $$ for their services. Incentive based and performance based contracts could work well if implemented thoughtfully. Unfortunately the facts are that some clubs can comfortably find the 1k and even if the other clubs offer say $700 + $150 for the best player the 1k wins out every time. Teams really need to focus on developing their available local talent and bringing in recruits that will buy into the club and their direction not their bank balance. Realistically guys like Tyson Waite and Joel Kay are prime examples of the kind of guys that I'm talking about. These boys could fetch massive bucks elsewhere but from the outside looking in they seem to choose the club and success over $$.
Bustarhyme
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:42 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: South Augusta

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby From The Outer » Sat Feb 02, 2013 6:41 pm

Dont worry Tyson and Joel are VERY well paid.
From The Outer
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:32 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 6 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby Caramels » Sat Feb 02, 2013 6:47 pm

Goldberg wrote:Some really interesting things going on in the world of RMFL this week!!



I think its time that the League committee remembered that they are in a position or roll, to serve the clubs, not the other way around!! I wonder if the Medal name change even went to a vote by the 7 clubs, & if it did, were those seven clubs delegates given the opportunity to go to their members & ask for opinions, because thats the way it is supposed to work isn't it?????



=D> =D> =D> =D>
There are many league directors or whatever name they wish to be known as who are there purely for their own ego sake.
Clubs maketh the leagues, not the other way round although in many instances, you wouldn't think so!
User avatar
Caramels
Under 16s
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:51 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby Bazza J » Sat Feb 02, 2013 7:22 pm

The name change is a great idea!
User avatar
Bazza J
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:58 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Karoonda

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby biffboy » Sat Feb 02, 2013 10:01 pm

From The Outer wrote:Dont worry Tyson and Joel are VERY well paid.

Speak for your own club FTO but I'll give you the hot tip, Joel Kay gets no more than 3 bills and is happy with that
biffboy
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 10:03 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 9 times
Grassroots Team: Ramblers

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby From The Outer » Sun Feb 03, 2013 7:55 am

Very amusing
From The Outer
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:32 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 6 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby grasshopper22 » Sun Feb 03, 2013 9:05 am

From The Outer wrote:Very amusing


Joel Kay is a gun, and no matter what they may be paying him he's worth every cent plus some in my opinion
User avatar
grasshopper22
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:13 pm
Has liked: 84 times
Been liked: 23 times

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby Caramels » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:02 am

Any substance in the Leon Davis to Meningie story in today's Sunday Mail?
User avatar
Caramels
Under 16s
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:51 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby From The Outer » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:29 am

Grasshopper, agree with your comments. What I dont understand is why clubs ( not just Ramblers ) would say they are paying crackers for high quality players when it is ok to pay them well. Joel came straight out of league football in the prime of his career. To suggest he would come for $150 is just laughable when his market value is close to 1K. Would be the feel good story of the decade.
From The Outer
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:32 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 6 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: River Murray Football League talk

Postby grasshopper22 » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:59 am

Caramels wrote:Any substance in the Leon Davis to Meningie story in today's Sunday Mail?


Haven't grabbed the Sunday mail just yet, this is the first I have heard of this!!
User avatar
grasshopper22
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:13 pm
Has liked: 84 times
Been liked: 23 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  Other Footy Leagues  Country Footy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |