by cod master » Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:33 pm
by Bum Crack » Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:42 pm
by Not Scared » Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:04 pm
by 200 Killer Wasps » Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:30 pm
by aceman » Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:48 pm
200 Killer Wasps wrote:Ramco - No, because it was their idea (moving to Indy's) first.
Wunkar - No, because they are already the Bulldogs.
East Murray - No, because they will lose the players who came from BSR and the ones they will get from BSR if they go somewhere else or fold.
Brown' Well - No, long way from out the back of Peebinga to Swan Reach.
Moorook - No, finishing eighth is better than ninth.
by Bum Crack » Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:49 pm
aceman wrote:200 Killer Wasps wrote:Ramco - No, because it was their idea (moving to Indy's) first.
Wunkar - No, because they are already the Bulldogs.
East Murray - No, because they will lose the players who came from BSR and the ones they will get from BSR if they go somewhere else or fold.
Brown' Well - No, long way from out the back of Peebinga to Swan Reach.
Moorook - No, finishing eighth is better than ninth.
I reckon you could bet that the SANFL/SACFL will tell these clubs that IT WILL happen and no correspondence will be entered into.
They are not in the habit of taking this sort of thing lying down.
by Dogwatcher » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:03 pm
by Queen Vic. » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:10 pm
by Ron Burgundy » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:14 pm
Queen Vic. wrote:Scott jenkins has signed at barossa in the BLG, any good
by Dogwatcher » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:29 pm
by BIG SEXY » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:48 pm
200 Killer Wasps wrote:Ramco - No, because it was their idea (moving to Indy's) first.
Wunkar - No, because they are already the Bulldogs.
East Murray - No, because they will lose the players who came from BSR and the ones they will get from BSR if they go somewhere else or fold.
Brown' Well - No, long way from out the back of Peebinga to Swan Reach.
Moorook - No, finishing eighth is better than ninth.
by 200 Killer Wasps » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:59 pm
by Bum Crack » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:03 pm
200 Killer Wasps wrote:Apologies BS, as you would well know I have absolutely no idea why the five teams would say no, it was all just tongue in cheek.
by 200 Killer Wasps » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:09 pm
by cod master » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:31 pm
by KS41 » Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:10 pm
cod master wrote:The SANFL have called a special meeting with all indy clubs Monday nite.
It looks like they are going to overturn the decision
And rightly so
by BIG SEXY » Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:14 am
by Bum Crack » Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:17 am
BIG SEXY wrote:i agree but not under the current structure.
sorry 200kw, so drugged up at the moment alot of things are slipping past me and i have it in for anyone with hair.
by Rough » Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:30 am
by Bum Crack » Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:38 am
Rough wrote:If you guys wondering about points system, go into SANFL website, community football league Regulations, right at the bottom of that document gives an example of approved player points system. I think it is a tad out of date however no mention of residential/occupational status there. Clubs need take into account coppers or teachers turning up start of the year when deciding how many points to recruit to.
I was of the understanding that SANFL have a standard system in all leagues now however I cant find exactly what the details are on their website. If any one has a decent link to it, please post it because I would really like to read the most up to date player points system.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |