seaess wrote:dont read to much into the Kangy and Meadows losses
both sides not suited to the conditions on the day
havn't heard that excuse for years

pity both teams have to play in them

by magpie in the 80's » Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:48 pm
seaess wrote:dont read to much into the Kangy and Meadows losses
both sides not suited to the conditions on the day
by seaess » Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:00 pm
magpie in the 80's wrote:seaess wrote:dont read to much into the Kangy and Meadows losses
both sides not suited to the conditions on the day
havn't heard that excuse for years![]()
pity both teams have to play in them
by choppy » Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:12 pm
razorback7 wrote:finally the rams showed what they are made of... luke percy back in the side made a huge difference.. great game to watch!
by The Crumber » Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:26 pm
by seaess » Sat Apr 26, 2008 8:47 pm
The Crumber wrote:Good Stuff Rams and Demons! Saw Cally and Gums today and Cally won by 5.3. Sad , but I reckon I saw 2 of the 3 bottom sides. Very lack-lustre game today, no-one stood out. Looked a bit like a kick in the park. I have been pushing for a Div 3 in the hills for ages and today's game just re-inforced my thoughts. On a positive note, I noticed that my Budget didn't contain any of Owen's self-written "Letters to the Editor". About bloody time. A bit of credibility in the League's handout was appreciated.
by hawkseye » Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:36 pm
by The Sorce » Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:53 am
magpie in the 80's wrote:seaess wrote:dont read to much into the Kangy and Meadows losses
both sides not suited to the conditions on the day
havn't heard that excuse for years![]()
pity both teams have to play in them
by footyislife » Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:50 am
by MIRACLE MAN » Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:05 am
by stan » Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:34 am
hawkseye wrote:Have heard that one of the Gumeracha recruits has had enough already of being belted. Chose not to play today.
by seaess » Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:25 am
MIRACLE MAN wrote:re meadows and Kangy not suited to the conditions..
Meadows played in the dry b4 the rain..kangy played in the wet!!!
Please clarify!!!
by seaess » Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:27 am
The Sorce wrote:magpie in the 80's wrote:seaess wrote:dont read to much into the Kangy and Meadows losses
both sides not suited to the conditions on the day
havn't heard that excuse for years![]()
pity both teams have to play in them
Not suited to the conditions.. Um you do realise that Football is a winter sport and to play well you have to play in the rain as well. That is shocking excuse. Echunga too quick and too much skill going forward for Kangy. Plus Echunga had 7 Out from Last weeks Win against Nairne.
by alice the camel » Sun Apr 27, 2008 2:02 pm
by seaess » Sun Apr 27, 2008 3:07 pm
by gks 5 » Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:28 pm
by razorback7 » Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:48 am
choppy wrote:razorback7 wrote:finally the rams showed what they are made of... luke percy back in the side made a huge difference.. great game to watch!
raz if thats what the rams are made of expect a few more losses this year wasnt real convincing. meadows were pretty average & probably kept the rams in the game with some average skills. but a win is a win. dont think will be the same next time.
by seaess » Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:31 am
by razorback7 » Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:08 am
alice the camel wrote:Watch out mid season for a full strenght Kangarilla, They will push any Central division team!
by Rooster » Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:29 am
razorback7 wrote:alice the camel wrote:Watch out mid season for a full strenght Kangarilla, They will push any Central division team!
Who the hell do you think you're kidding!!! Kangy wouldn't get within 25 goals of Mt Lofty, Uraidla or Hahndorf!! MASSIVE difference between the 2 divs................................ Div 2 is full of Div 1 hasbeens and scrubbers blended with the odd good player!!!
by razorback7 » Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:42 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |