by Tanka » Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:16 am
by Cougar » Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:17 am
BRaG wrote:Callington not finishing out the year could prove interesting with the top few teams so close, percentage could be what splits some teams.
Anyone know why Gumeracha B grade forfeited? Know if they will front up this week?
by Justquietly » Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:33 am
by bernie » Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:48 am
by ORDoubleBlues » Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:07 am
The Crumber wrote:great dropkick wrote:Cougar ... any truth in rumors that the Brookers may be filing for a significant amount of money to compensate for the Eagles decision to forfeit? ... wot with lost gate, canteen and bar takings, reckon $3000 may be on the cards ... may be Cally should have played, mite have lost the match by heaps, but will cost them plenty ($$$$)not to have played, together with fines and paying umpiring fees.
Their biggest cost of all GD will be their credibility. From what I've heard, they still seem to think it was all justified and don't want to discuss it. 8-9 sick players has grown to 19-20, depending on who you listen to. Hope the HFL will also touch on the subject of lost votes for a potential Brookers' Mail Medal winner, not to mention leading goal-kickers etc.
by Justquietly » Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:14 am
bernie wrote:Disappointing to see Fleet has lost the plot. The boy can play but seems like the left ventricle has gone again.....
BTW JQ, Chuck Norris' calendar goes straight from March 31st to April 2nd......No-one fools Chuck Norris.
by The Crumber » Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:23 am
ORDoubleBlues wrote:The Crumber wrote:great dropkick wrote:Cougar ... any truth in rumors that the Brookers may be filing for a significant amount of money to compensate for the Eagles decision to forfeit? ... wot with lost gate, canteen and bar takings, reckon $3000 may be on the cards ... may be Cally should have played, mite have lost the match by heaps, but will cost them plenty ($$$$)not to have played, together with fines and paying umpiring fees.
Their biggest cost of all GD will be their credibility. From what I've heard, they still seem to think it was all justified and don't want to discuss it. 8-9 sick players has grown to 19-20, depending on who you listen to. Hope the HFL will also touch on the subject of lost votes for a potential Brookers' Mail Medal winner, not to mention leading goal-kickers etc.
The players not rocking up side of it has been going on for a while too. You can go right back to the 2001 season where they'd be competitive at home and get absolutely flogged for their away games.
by Amateur Footy » Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:00 pm
by THE BARKING SPIDERS » Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:14 pm
by Yoda » Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:16 pm
by BRaG » Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:22 pm
by Tex » Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:41 pm
Tanka wrote:Tex.....did you see the Battams incident??? From my understanding he has been charged with making deliberate contact with an umpire not striking. Apparently the ball was kicked into the area and as TM was trying to back out of the way he and Battams collided. Would have thought it would be easier to cite him for negligent contact or reckless etc as now TM has to prove he deliberately went for him.
Battams may be an old school player... ie hit or get hit, but there is no way he would try to hit an ump......surely none of us know anyone that plays in either div that is likely to do that??
by LuvsFooty » Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:48 pm
by rednblue » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:30 pm
by Cougar » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:31 pm
Tex wrote:Tanka wrote:Tex.....did you see the Battams incident??? From my understanding he has been charged with making deliberate contact with an umpire not striking. Apparently the ball was kicked into the area and as TM was trying to back out of the way he and Battams collided. Would have thought it would be easier to cite him for negligent contact or reckless etc as now TM has to prove he deliberately went for him.
Battams may be an old school player... ie hit or get hit, but there is no way he would try to hit an ump......surely none of us know anyone that plays in either div that is likely to do that??
Tanka, I didnt see it but Levi Bailey did and thought it was deliberate. As Levi explained it TM went to take evasive action as he saw Battams charging him in doing so he turned his head the wrong way and Battams collected him across the head where as he probably would have hit on the shoulder had TM not moved at all. Point is Levi thought that he intentionally ran at TM to make contact. It will be interesting to see if they can prove it.
by The Gimp » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:37 pm
by Tex » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:40 pm
Cougar wrote:Tex wrote:Tanka wrote:Tex.....did you see the Battams incident??? From my understanding he has been charged with making deliberate contact with an umpire not striking. Apparently the ball was kicked into the area and as TM was trying to back out of the way he and Battams collided. Would have thought it would be easier to cite him for negligent contact or reckless etc as now TM has to prove he deliberately went for him.
Battams may be an old school player... ie hit or get hit, but there is no way he would try to hit an ump......surely none of us know anyone that plays in either div that is likely to do that??
Tanka, I didnt see it but Levi Bailey did and thought it was deliberate. As Levi explained it TM went to take evasive action as he saw Battams charging him in doing so he turned his head the wrong way and Battams collected him across the head where as he probably would have hit on the shoulder had TM not moved at all. Point is Levi thought that he intentionally ran at TM to make contact. It will be interesting to see if they can prove it.
If it WAS an accidental collision, how does TM sustain a black eye when he is over 6ft and Battams around the 5ft mark??
by THE BARKING SPIDERS » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:42 pm
LuvsFooty wrote:'The Big Red' Barnett at Cally. He has tried to get things up and running, but it seems that again things have come unstuck. he is a good bloke but he now has had a go at Goolwa/Port Elliot, Hamley Bridge and Callington with similar results. Most highly paid so called stars are no good for country clubs
by Tanka » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:46 pm
Tex wrote:Cougar wrote:Tex wrote:Tanka wrote:Tex.....did you see the Battams incident??? From my understanding he has been charged with making deliberate contact with an umpire not striking. Apparently the ball was kicked into the area and as TM was trying to back out of the way he and Battams collided. Would have thought it would be easier to cite him for negligent contact or reckless etc as now TM has to prove he deliberately went for him.
Battams may be an old school player... ie hit or get hit, but there is no way he would try to hit an ump......surely none of us know anyone that plays in either div that is likely to do that??
Tanka, I didnt see it but Levi Bailey did and thought it was deliberate. As Levi explained it TM went to take evasive action as he saw Battams charging him in doing so he turned his head the wrong way and Battams collected him across the head where as he probably would have hit on the shoulder had TM not moved at all. Point is Levi thought that he intentionally ran at TM to make contact. It will be interesting to see if they can prove it.
If it WAS an accidental collision, how does TM sustain a black eye when he is over 6ft and Battams around the 5ft mark??
I am certain it was no accident and Levi was 100% certain it was no accident. All of us that Know TM know he would not say it was deliberate if it wasnt. Good umpire Good bloke.
by Tex » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:53 pm
Football
Other Footy Leagues
Country Footy
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

