by OldCooper » Mon May 31, 2010 10:21 pm
by Boston Prodigy » Mon May 31, 2010 10:22 pm
by untapped ability » Mon May 31, 2010 10:23 pm
Boston Prodigy wrote:Harry Miller - 4 weeks
Phillip Dudley- 2 weeks
![]()
![]()
Im sure MarblePark can eleborate further...
by untapped ability » Mon May 31, 2010 10:24 pm
Boston Prodigy wrote:Just realised that Harry will make his come back match against Bostons...
by untapped ability » Mon May 31, 2010 10:25 pm
Boston Prodigy wrote:Just realised that Harry will make his come back match against Bostons...
by daicos » Mon May 31, 2010 10:34 pm
untapped ability wrote:Boston Prodigy wrote: Paeky was taken to the ground and was booted in the face by Phillip. .Boston Prodigy wrote:
Phillip Dudley- 2 weeks
...
by daicos » Mon May 31, 2010 10:40 pm
Boston Prodigy wrote:d
Im sure MarblePark can eleborate further...
by Alaska » Mon May 31, 2010 11:00 pm
steiger wrote:One thing at time from me. First up the alleged "pitch invasion" by members and/or supporters of the BFC. Definitely not condoned in your normal punchup/brawl between 2 sides. BUT when a kid (any player for that matter but especially a kid) is allegedly being held by one and punched by another and then he's unconcious and then the boots are in and one of this kicks could kave killed him if it got him in the wrong spot, then I would like to know who wouldn't jump the fence. You can work it for yourselves what I would think of that person. It may well be hats off to the person(s) jumping the fence as they may have saved his life. Couldn't happen you say ?????
Then we are left with the precedent where, at some game in the future, someone else jumps the fence to "save some other person's life" , however back to this case - Unfortunately the BFC "invaders" need to be properly sanctioned and penalised for their deed so that these future "heroic" events do not eventuate as there is the awareness that it could be the end of football invlovement/spectating for them. The kicker, well he needs to be rubbed out for a long, long time
by Media Park » Mon May 31, 2010 11:33 pm
untapped ability wrote:Boston Prodigy wrote:Just realised that Harry will make his come back match against Bostons...
Both players will be back aftert Mortlock as Mortlock matches count as matches served
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Media Park » Mon May 31, 2010 11:34 pm
untapped ability wrote:Boston Prodigy wrote:Just realised that Harry will make his come back match against Bostons...
at Mallee Park oval too
I know I will not be there
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by daicos » Mon May 31, 2010 11:47 pm
by Media Park » Mon May 31, 2010 11:52 pm
daicos wrote:ok you cant comment but is anything else going to come of the incident or is that it?
does the boston supporter/supporters have to face the law or is it acceptable to do what they did?
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Boston Prodigy » Mon May 31, 2010 11:53 pm
MarblePark wrote:Will you be tagging him BP?
by daicos » Mon May 31, 2010 11:59 pm
MarblePark wrote:daicos wrote:ok you cant comment but is anything else going to come of the incident or is that it?
does the boston supporter/supporters have to face the law or is it acceptable to do what they did?
I haven't spoke to anyone in authority about it, so this is obviously my personal opinion...
"Critter," whose real name is still a mystery to everyone I've spoken to, didn't break any football rules.
I think we can all agree that what he did was, for the most part, wrong, even though there is some justification, but...
I can't find a football rule that he has broken.
by Media Park » Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:04 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by untapped ability » Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:08 am
MarblePark wrote:I could be wrong, but I'm pretty good at things like this...
And, no, murder is not in the football rules.
But creating a public disturbance (which he did by intervening in the footy match), public drunkenness (well he was pi$$ed), common assault (ALLEGEDLY), and a few others are against the laws of the commonwealth of australia, so he might have an issue there...
by Media Park » Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:10 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by untapped ability » Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:12 am
MarblePark wrote:UA- I can talk myself out of a lot, but I cannot give my honest opinion there.
by djd » Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:40 am
by tiger08 » Tue Jun 01, 2010 8:35 am
MarblePark wrote:OL- last one, because I'm laughing too hard...
More chance of Goldie completing the 40 hour famine...
Seriously thought, Bostons hat isn't on my head, my "love of football" hat is.
You can't have the situation where players and spectators are actually scared of going to Pecker Park, which is what we have now.
There is not adequate enough protection for the players, and for clubs to fulfil their "duty of care" to it's own players, they should be forfeiting Mallee Park matches.
Having said that, it isn't opposing clubs fault, so Mallee's should be farewelled....
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |