by limb » Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:31 pm
by cuzzy » Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:05 pm
by kappars » Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:21 pm
cuzzy wrote:bays accounted for McLaren Vale easily again on saturday in a very spiteful and negative game. After several stouches in the B grade with a player from McLaren being shown the red it was always going to be a rough day at the McLaren home ground. Bays went in at quarter time but after that never looked back and kicked on.
The entertaining game to watch however was marred by several disgusting incidents that surely will see McLaren vale reported to the league. During the game a male supporter of McLaren vale was abusing and threatining a female who was the partner of a bays player. She basically sat there and had to take it until some B grade players told him where to go. Then after the game a McLaren player took it apon him self to racially abuse an aboriginal player from the Bays even though they lost by over 7 goals (weak as piss). This started another bit of biffo after the game and resulted in the McLaren Player being reported after the game. After this had all calmed down the bays moved from the oval to the change rooms where apon entering the race a bays player was attacked by a spectator who was about 7ft and over 40 years of age. This resulted in the bays players being attacked by several other spectators and then also the whole McLaren team ran from the oval and got involved. If i was associated with McLaren Vale i would be embarrased. F%^king disgusted would be my words.
Where does the league go from here, how do they stop the spectator from entering the oval ever again and how does he become banned etc. What should the penatly be. I would say at the least a massive fine to the club and at a minimum the club looses the points in which they gained from junior matches and B grade games throughout the day.
by limb » Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:52 pm
cuzzy wrote:im not sure what happened limb, i didnt ask any questions last night, got to training late and had to leave as soon as done due to work. Think as far as the bays are concerned we are chasing a spot in the final five where McLaren vale will hopefully and most likley finish bottom. I know which club i would rather be at. In other words i think we have better things to worry about than feral teams who cant get a kick on the park and need there spectators to help them out after the game. Maybe they should give there spectators a gurnsey, they might acctually get a kick.
has langhorne sorted its injury situation, it was interesting to see Compass beat them in the B grade also last sat. To this week, looking foward to the yank game, powering through the mud will slow the quick little fast bastards down.
by Mr Magoo » Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:21 pm
by BJ Ernest » Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:32 pm
Mr Magoo wrote:Still with all players back The Creek need a ruckman to be able to compete with Steele, Webb and Duff. Plenty of pace but a bit short around the ground for tough hard finals footy
by shoe boy » Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:21 pm
BJ Ernest wrote:Mr Magoo wrote:Still with all players back The Creek need a ruckman to be able to compete with Steele, Webb and Duff. Plenty of pace but a bit short around the ground for tough hard finals footy
Not sure whats going on with Ox James but when fit is a super tough opponent and would give all 3 of them a run!
by BJ Ernest » Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:24 pm
shoe boy wrote:BJ Ernest wrote:Mr Magoo wrote:Still with all players back The Creek need a ruckman to be able to compete with Steele, Webb and Duff. Plenty of pace but a bit short around the ground for tough hard finals footy
Not sure whats going on with Ox James but when fit is a super tough opponent and would give all 3 of them a run!
BJ have you any news on Bazz coming back HOME to coach the B grade!
by shoe boy » Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:35 pm
BJ Ernest wrote:shoe boy wrote:BJ Ernest wrote:Mr Magoo wrote:Still with all players back The Creek need a ruckman to be able to compete with Steele, Webb and Duff. Plenty of pace but a bit short around the ground for tough hard finals footy
Not sure whats going on with Ox James but when fit is a super tough opponent and would give all 3 of them a run!
BJ have you any news on Bazz coming back HOME to coach the B grade!
Shoe Boy i highly doubt Barry would be going home to the Shoe to coach the 2s.
As far as Barry is concerned he is HOME
by Teflon_Coated » Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:55 pm
UpTheShoes wrote:If Encounter Bay trully believed they were innocent, then why not show up to the tribunal hearing? The story has been twisted so far out of proportion, there's no point arguing it anymore.
by cuzzy » Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:59 pm
kappars wrote:cuzzy wrote:bays accounted for McLaren Vale easily again on saturday in a very spiteful and negative game. After several stouches in the B grade with a player from McLaren being shown the red it was always going to be a rough day at the McLaren home ground. Bays went in at quarter time but after that never looked back and kicked on.
The entertaining game to watch however was marred by several disgusting incidents that surely will see McLaren vale reported to the league. During the game a male supporter of McLaren vale was abusing and threatining a female who was the partner of a bays player. She basically sat there and had to take it until some B grade players told him where to go. Then after the game a McLaren player took it apon him self to racially abuse an aboriginal player from the Bays even though they lost by over 7 goals (weak as piss). This started another bit of biffo after the game and resulted in the McLaren Player being reported after the game. After this had all calmed down the bays moved from the oval to the change rooms where apon entering the race a bays player was attacked by a spectator who was about 7ft and over 40 years of age. This resulted in the bays players being attacked by several other spectators and then also the whole McLaren team ran from the oval and got involved. If i was associated with McLaren Vale i would be embarrased. F%^king disgusted would be my words.
Where does the league go from here, how do they stop the spectator from entering the oval ever again and how does he become banned etc. What should the penatly be. I would say at the least a massive fine to the club and at a minimum the club looses the points in which they gained from junior matches and B grade games throughout the day.
Cuzzy this is one of your post from page 217 whats made you change your mind? Are the Bays not as innocent as you made them out to be?
In saying that no matter what the situation spectators should never be involved!!
by Micky Conlan » Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:12 pm
by Mr Magoo » Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:26 pm
by UpTheShoes » Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:52 am
Teflon Coated wrote:UpTheShoes wrote:If Encounter Bay trully believed they were innocent, then why not show up to the tribunal hearing? The story has been twisted so far out of proportion, there's no point arguing it anymore.
It was actually Raymond Love that was attacked by a man twice his age after the game; the boys do not have a car and rely on lifts from Salisbury to get to training twice a week plus Saturdays. Thats right they go up twice just to train - being told by the association on Tuesday night that a hearing will be held on a Wednesday is a bit short notice don't you think?
I dont give a toss what anyones take on it is; when a feral spectator enters into an altercation with any player after a spout of racial abuse toward that player then it should be an automatic suspension without deliberation - even more relevant is the fact that all parties agree that it happened.
The story is not twisted at all, just read my posts - they are the most accurate
by The Big Shrek » Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:39 pm
UpTheShoes wrote:Teflon Coated wrote:UpTheShoes wrote:If Encounter Bay trully believed they were innocent, then why not show up to the tribunal hearing? The story has been twisted so far out of proportion, there's no point arguing it anymore.
It was actually Raymond Love that was attacked by a man twice his age after the game; the boys do not have a car and rely on lifts from Salisbury to get to training twice a week plus Saturdays. Thats right they go up twice just to train - being told by the association on Tuesday night that a hearing will be held on a Wednesday is a bit short notice don't you think?
I dont give a toss what anyones take on it is; when a feral spectator enters into an altercation with any player after a spout of racial abuse toward that player then it should be an automatic suspension without deliberation - even more relevant is the fact that all parties agree that it happened.
The story is not twisted at all, just read my posts - they are the most accurate
Indeed they are accurate ... from an Encounter point of view. As for a "feral" spectator, walk through a crowd in a bar with your fingers up, shouting obsenities, and more than likely someone will belt you. So why bother trying it at a footy game. Furthermore I have heard what was said to both individuals and if they spin that off into racial abuse then they certainly need more schooling!
by limb » Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:23 pm
by Mr Magoo » Sat Jul 19, 2008 9:18 pm
by cyclops » Sat Jul 19, 2008 10:10 pm
by GWW » Sat Jul 19, 2008 10:11 pm
cyclops wrote:anyone know how victor went and who they played against?
by cyclops » Sat Jul 19, 2008 10:13 pm
GWW wrote:cyclops wrote:anyone know how victor went and who they played against?
Its discussed 2 post above yours.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |