by OnSong » Mon May 31, 2010 1:26 pm
by Ken Whelan Fan » Mon May 31, 2010 1:54 pm
by steakn » Mon May 31, 2010 2:27 pm
by white_line_fever » Mon May 31, 2010 2:34 pm
by Media Park » Mon May 31, 2010 3:07 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by doggone » Mon May 31, 2010 3:24 pm
by overloaded » Mon May 31, 2010 4:02 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by untapped ability » Mon May 31, 2010 4:18 pm
MarblePark wrote:Righto... thoughts on tonight?
The tribunal on recent history, suggests leniency for the two players, so I'm going to say that they'll get two games each.
Reality is their seasons should be over.
by shobtop1 » Mon May 31, 2010 5:00 pm
MarblePark wrote:I'd love right now to hear a list of "worst of's" we all have from our dealings with MPFC...
For mine it was a couple of years back, I'm not sure if Panther was coaching or not, but we (Bostons) won the A Grade at Mallee's (first time in the nine seasons I've been involved at Bostons), and came back into the rooms to discover that our bags had been raided, with phones and wallets gone...
by steiger » Mon May 31, 2010 5:01 pm
by westcoastpanther » Mon May 31, 2010 5:23 pm
steiger wrote:BUT when a kid (any player for that matter but especially a kid) is allegedly being held by one and punched by another and then he's unconcious and then the boots are in and one of this kicks could kave killed him if it got him in the wrong spot, then I would like to know who wouldn't jump the fence.
by OnSong » Mon May 31, 2010 5:30 pm
by Media Park » Mon May 31, 2010 5:39 pm
steiger wrote:One thing at time from me. First up the alleged "pitch invasion" by members and/or supporters of the BFC. Definitely not condoned in your normal punchup/brawl between 2 sides. BUT when a kid (any player for that matter but especially a kid) is allegedly being held by one and punched by another and then he's unconcious and then the boots are in and one of this kicks could kave killed him if it got him in the wrong spot, then I would like to know who wouldn't jump the fence. You can work it for yourselves what I would think of that person. It may well be hats off to the person(s) jumping the fence as they may have saved his life. Couldn't happen you say ?????
Then we are left with the precedent where, at some game in the future, someone else jumps the fence to "save some other person's life" , however back to this case - Unfortunately the BFC "invaders" need to be properly sanctioned and penalised for their deed so that these future "heroic" events do not eventuate as there is the awareness that it could be the end of football invlovement/spectating for them. The kicker, well he needs to be rubbed out for a long, long time
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by sound4 » Mon May 31, 2010 5:40 pm
OnSong wrote:With such blatant and violent disregard for the rules, I'm not surprised WCP.
Footy is dangerous enough without incidents such as the weekend's.
I'm sure most supporters don't mind seeing the odd bit of physicality and scuffle, but an out and out attack on an unconscious player is beyond football.
If it was off the field of play, the perpetrator would likely face jail time or at the least, a hefty fine.
by bluestheboy » Mon May 31, 2010 5:45 pm
by Media Park » Mon May 31, 2010 5:49 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by OnSong » Mon May 31, 2010 5:55 pm
MarblePark wrote: What message would it send to parents watching the game? how keen would they be to let their kids playing footy, if these sorts of incidents are to occur? And be let go?
by overloaded » Mon May 31, 2010 5:57 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by overloaded » Mon May 31, 2010 5:58 pm
MarblePark wrote:I've garnered a lot of opinion today about the issue, spoken to quite a few people, and the general thought is that p. dudley has form, and shouldn't return this year, and harry should have quite a long holiday.
my problem is that I should remain fairly silent on the matter, but I'm fairly passionate about this, and I don't want to imagine the uproar if this is not dealt with as it should be.
An left-field thought that I heard today was about parents/kids at the footy on that day.
What message would it send to parents watching the game? how keen would they be to let their kids playing footy, if these sorts of incidents are to occur? And be let go?
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by overloaded » Mon May 31, 2010 6:00 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |