

by the big fella » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:09 am
by NSP » Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:50 pm
TOPNOTCH wrote:NSP wrote:Off The Wall wrote:Gums beat Meadows by 4 points after leading into the final break by 4 goals and at one stage up by 8 goals in the 3rd. A dubious decision against meadows in the goalsquare cost them a certain win in the dying minutes
The ball was stopped just before the goal line was very close, A good hitout by both sides with some positive signs from botch clubs Meadows have improved from last year, If Gumeracha want to be a top 3 side and can keep their team on the straight and narrow then they have a lot of work to do
by The Crumber » Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:22 pm
Rams52 wrote:Nairne by 330 points or so....Cally not much chop again.
Any other scores??
by BALL BANGER » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:13 pm
by Kickittometoo » Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:03 pm
BALL BANGER wrote:Any clubs with a C-Grade looking for players? What days/nights do they play
by the big fella » Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:17 am
by the big fella » Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:37 am
by the big fella » Tue Apr 13, 2010 12:00 pm
by FlyingHigh » Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:32 pm
the big fella wrote:1 Nairne Bremer 1 1 0 0 0 0 339 6 5650.00 2
2 Kersbrook 1 1 0 0 0 0 123 6 2050.00 2
3
The percentages from the new site look a little out!!
by aceman » Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:35 pm
the big fella wrote:Cally had 2 colts play As ..not sure re the Bs playing As but u would ahve to say not many where suitable..
a very disappointing situation for football in general and a blight on the HFL hierachy for their inaction on this matter..and Big O..u can quote me!!!
by Goldberg » Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:33 pm
aceman wrote:the big fella wrote:Cally had 2 colts play As ..not sure re the Bs playing As but u would ahve to say not many where suitable..
a very disappointing situation for football in general and a blight on the HFL hierachy for their inaction on this matter..and Big O..u can quote me!!!
Not much point these blokes carrying on either, a complete waste of everything.
by benchmark » Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:58 pm
NSP wrote:TOPNOTCH wrote:NSP wrote:Off The Wall wrote:Gums beat Meadows by 4 points after leading into the final break by 4 goals and at one stage up by 8 goals in the 3rd. A dubious decision against meadows in the goalsquare cost them a certain win in the dying minutes
The ball was stopped just before the goal line was very close, A good hitout by both sides with some positive signs from botch clubs Meadows have improved from last year, If Gumeracha want to be a top 3 side and can keep their team on the straight and narrow then they have a lot of work to do
TOPNOTCH what is your issue with Gumeracha the only time you seem to post anything is when u have an opinion on the club what is your problem
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Apr 13, 2010 3:02 pm
benchmark wrote: Can anyone explain why a team can play two players who have had life bans from other leagues ???
by Bat Pad » Tue Apr 13, 2010 3:08 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:benchmark wrote: Can anyone explain why a team can play two players who have had life bans from other leagues ???
They aren't exactly "life bans". In the SAAFL, if you get reported enough times to be suspended for 12 matches within a 3 year period, the SAAFL will de-register you and you will not be allowed to play in the SAAFL again unless you apply and become successful.
These players didn't do a "single" act that warranted a life time ban.
by Executive Member » Tue Apr 13, 2010 3:20 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:benchmark wrote: Can anyone explain why a team can play two players who have had life bans from other leagues ???
They aren't exactly "life bans". In the SAAFL, if you get reported enough times to be suspended for 12 matches within a 3 year period, the SAAFL will de-register you and you will not be allowed to play in the SAAFL again unless you apply and become successful.
These players didn't do a "single" act that warranted a life time ban.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Apr 13, 2010 3:21 pm
Bat Pad wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:benchmark wrote: Can anyone explain why a team can play two players who have had life bans from other leagues ???
They aren't exactly "life bans". In the SAAFL, if you get reported enough times to be suspended for 12 matches within a 3 year period, the SAAFL will de-register you and you will not be allowed to play in the SAAFL again unless you apply and become successful.
These players didn't do a "single" act that warranted a life time ban.
So basically they are just genuine thugs who continually do things to get suspended as opposed to possibly doing one stupid thing in an otherwise clean career.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Apr 13, 2010 3:22 pm
Executive Member wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:benchmark wrote: Can anyone explain why a team can play two players who have had life bans from other leagues ???
They aren't exactly "life bans". In the SAAFL, if you get reported enough times to be suspended for 12 matches within a 3 year period, the SAAFL will de-register you and you will not be allowed to play in the SAAFL again unless you apply and become successful.
These players didn't do a "single" act that warranted a life time ban.
just to clarify LM - its once you hit 12 games then thats it - there is no time limit - you could get in one hit or could take you 10 years
I think other leagues are looking at the SAAFL model as well, which the SAAFL got off the Western Australian's who have had it for about 10 years - cleaned up their league no end by all reports
by the breezer » Tue Apr 13, 2010 3:34 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Apr 13, 2010 3:41 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Executive Member wrote:
just to clarify LM - its once you hit 12 games then thats it - there is no time limit - you could get in one hit or could take you 10 years
I think other leagues are looking at the SAAFL model as well, which the SAAFL got off the Western Australian's who have had it for about 10 years - cleaned up their league no end by all reports
12 matches in a 3 year period.
by Executive Member » Tue Apr 13, 2010 3:43 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Executive Member wrote:
just to clarify LM - its once you hit 12 games then thats it - there is no time limit - you could get in one hit or could take you 10 years
I think other leagues are looking at the SAAFL model as well, which the SAAFL got off the Western Australian's who have had it for about 10 years - cleaned up their league no end by all reports
12 matches in a 3 year period.
What EM said, I stand corrected, 12 accumulative matches.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |