kappars wrote:cuzzy wrote:bays once again kicked themselves out of the game unfortunatly. Matched creeks all the way but the difference is a big full foward. If the bays can get their hands on a big full foward ASAP they will be up in the top 3.
The fowards the bays had on sat did a great job and the midfeild and defence was outstanding but without a presence of a big man up foward who can out muscle and take a big pack mark it makes it very hard.
Although the margin was just under 5 goals the game was much closer than the score line suggests.
Come on Cuzzy I was not at the game Saturday as i was hoping to be, but after speaking to a few people they have all said Creek played terrible and copped a massive spray after the game because they were so bad! No way would bays be a top three side with just one new player, Bays have the best draw for the start of the season out of all clubs and the in there last five games are going to see them drop alot and may slip out of the top 5 (if they are in at this stage of the sweason) like 07?
Losing 2 games by under a kick and a third by few goals with 17 players running out the last quarter makes the Bays ordinary does it? No credit where it is due; apparently every loss the Bays have had has been due to the oppositions poor form on the day. This seems to be a common theme... maybe there's more to it....? At any rate looks like the Saints will be playing in the GF this year; I mean they did beat Yank.