The Bunyip wrote:For Mallala, Christian Rimmer ran hard all day out of the middle, while Lance Whitnell continued to win plenty of ball from the stoppages.
assume they meant Liam Whitwell, or have Mallala picked up a new recruit?

by Bob Loblaw » Sat Sep 06, 2008 9:36 am
The Bunyip wrote:For Mallala, Christian Rimmer ran hard all day out of the middle, while Lance Whitnell continued to win plenty of ball from the stoppages.
by crazyfootball madman » Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:17 pm
by Mythical Creature » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:06 pm
by Dr. Pink » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:30 pm
by last paper purse » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:40 am
by jumbo » Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:00 pm
Dr. Pink wrote:Long time reader, first time poster. Agree with what you say MC. The thing that annoys me is that clubs like Hamley, Hummocks, Two Wells, host finals with what some would call substandard facilities. Thats all well and good but how about spending some of the money you make from finals back into the facilities. When was the last time that Two Wells, Hamley or Lochiel improved their facilities. It appears quite a while ago. I say if you aren't going to "attempt" to continue improving your facilities then don't ask to host finals as this is where the extra revenue should be directed.
by jumbo » Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:06 pm
Bob Loblaw wrote:The Bunyip wrote:For Mallala, Christian Rimmer ran hard all day out of the middle, while Lance Whitnell continued to win plenty of ball from the stoppages.
assume they meant Liam Whitwell, or have Mallala picked up a new recruit?
by last paper purse » Sun Sep 07, 2008 3:01 pm
by crazyfootball madman » Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:10 pm
by scud » Sun Sep 07, 2008 8:06 pm
Mythical Creature wrote:Rock up to Hamley today and see that they have mede the oval to appear to be in as good a condition as ive seen it in. Well done! (obviously still not up to other ovals standards)
Well done Mallala, flogged Hummocks. Hummocks kicked a few at the end of the match when Mallala took their foot right off the pedal to show some credibility on the scoreboard.
One question has to be asked though. What are you doing to the country footy supporter Hamley? Buy a beer $4.50, can of coke $2.50, Spirit Can $7. Beautiful weather, run out of bottled water at half time of the B Grade
.
What a rip-off. C'mon guys its not a pub or a city night club its a country footy club FFS! Lifting prices of all drinks by $1 simply because its finals is not good enough. Its little wonder the club was empty most of the day.
by twogood4u » Sun Sep 07, 2008 8:13 pm
by crazyfootball madman » Sun Sep 07, 2008 8:45 pm
by jumbo » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:14 pm
by Ace of Spades » Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:06 pm
jumbo wrote:Perfect opportunity this year to get it right - last 2 venues are Virginia and Mallala - a simple swap would make the whole thing fair and equitable - Prelim at Mallala - GF at Virginia. The league is about the A grade game, not the B grade, not the U17s and not the Netball. If there is no home ground for B, U17, U14, any netball BUT the game is at the home ground of one the A grade teams ground the whole league looses credibility IMHO.
The "sharing" of the grand final between 2 clubs only is unacceptable. TG4U is right - 1 at Longies - 6 at Balak and Mallala - previous 12 years is probably 11 or 12 Balak and Mallala.
What happened at Lochiel today - nothing appearing on football-online yet. The post up the page suggests Balak lost both A and B - is this correct?
by Ace of Spades » Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:09 pm
scud wrote:Mythical Creature wrote:Rock up to Hamley today and see that they have mede the oval to appear to be in as good a condition as ive seen it in. Well done! (obviously still not up to other ovals standards)
Well done Mallala, flogged Hummocks. Hummocks kicked a few at the end of the match when Mallala took their foot right off the pedal to show some credibility on the scoreboard.
One question has to be asked though. What are you doing to the country footy supporter Hamley? Buy a beer $4.50, can of coke $2.50, Spirit Can $7. Beautiful weather, run out of bottled water at half time of the B Grade
.
What a rip-off. C'mon guys its not a pub or a city night club its a country footy club FFS! Lifting prices of all drinks by $1 simply because its finals is not good enough. Its little wonder the club was empty most of the day.
Your a disgrace MC, The oval surface yesterday was as good as your getting in country football, everyone at the club deserve to be applauded for the efforts that were put in to get the oval up to finals football standards, I heard the presidant was out first thing yesterday morning with a pair of scissors cutting each longer blade of grass...... well done guys.
As for the price of things, maybe you should get out a bit more, i cant remember the last time i bought a can of softy at a footy game for a $1.50, besides were you at todays game at Lochiel, im pretty sure that prices are the same across the board, so in stead of being such a tight a@#e, maybe look into things a little more before having a go at Hamley.
P.S haven't you heard about the alco-pops tax????????
by Ace of Spades » Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:18 pm
Dr. Pink wrote:Long time reader, first time poster. Agree with what you say MC. The thing that annoys me is that clubs like Hamley, Hummocks, Two Wells, host finals with what some would call substandard facilities. Thats all well and good but how about spending some of the money you make from finals back into the facilities. When was the last time that Two Wells, Hamley or Lochiel improved their facilities. It appears quite a while ago. I say if you aren't going to "attempt" to continue improving your facilities then don't ask to host finals as this is where the extra revenue should be directed.
by The Rooster » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:31 am
Dr. Pink wrote:Long time reader, first time poster. Agree with what you say MC. The thing that annoys me is that clubs like Hamley, Hummocks, Two Wells, host finals with what some would call substandard facilities. Thats all well and good but how about spending some of the money you make from finals back into the facilities. When was the last time that Two Wells, Hamley or Lochiel improved their facilities. It appears quite a while ago. I say if you aren't going to "attempt" to continue improving your facilities then don't ask to host finals as this is where the extra revenue should be directed.
by uncle_fester » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:59 am
The Rooster wrote:Dr. Pink wrote:Long time reader, first time poster. Agree with what you say MC. The thing that annoys me is that clubs like Hamley, Hummocks, Two Wells, host finals with what some would call substandard facilities. Thats all well and good but how about spending some of the money you make from finals back into the facilities. When was the last time that Two Wells, Hamley or Lochiel improved their facilities. It appears quite a while ago. I say if you aren't going to "attempt" to continue improving your facilities then don't ask to host finals as this is where the extra revenue should be directed.
Neck up!!
We got a new floormat for the showers!! Jeez, what more do you blokes want? When was the last time you bought yourself a brand new set of changerooms, and do you reckon we could snare one on E-Bay?
Fair Dinkum, i would concede that our changerooms are a tad dusty, but the committee are all over that trying to get some cash together to sort that, but apart from that our oval, club, parking, barbecue are as good as they get in this league.
by Hazbeen » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:54 am
crazyfootball madman wrote:wake up idiots,the grand final is moved between mallala and balaklava each yr,along with the other finals being moved around each yr,there are always pro and cons but some clubs do recieve alot of funding but where does it go and some clubs reciecve funding for other things but then use that money else where and i have a little proof on that subject,i reckon i heard twowells have something in the pipe line somewhere,as for the weekend i reckon both clubs did well,yes hamley got caught out with the wheather,but it not easy wk,as for the games,GOODBYE BALAKLAVA not even big mouth winging runner could save both grades,hamley reserves did a great job coming back from first quarter and one would expect them to run over mallala,united,well a big one this week indeed,look out humm and mallala here they come
by jumbo » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:24 am
uncle_fester wrote:The Rooster wrote:Dr. Pink wrote:Long time reader, first time poster. Agree with what you say MC. The thing that annoys me is that clubs like Hamley, Hummocks, Two Wells, host finals with what some would call substandard facilities. Thats all well and good but how about spending some of the money you make from finals back into the facilities. When was the last time that Two Wells, Hamley or Lochiel improved their facilities. It appears quite a while ago. I say if you aren't going to "attempt" to continue improving your facilities then don't ask to host finals as this is where the extra revenue should be directed.
Neck up!!
We got a new floormat for the showers!! Jeez, what more do you blokes want? When was the last time you bought yourself a brand new set of changerooms, and do you reckon we could snare one on E-Bay?
Fair Dinkum, i would concede that our changerooms are a tad dusty, but the committee are all over that trying to get some cash together to sort that, but apart from that our oval, club, parking, barbecue are as good as they get in this league.
oval. ha! balaklava, mallala, long plains easily better.
no doubt you need new changerooms. my bedroom is bigger. and i live in a tent!![]()
you guys get the council to put the sand on the pitch, the council to build your little ticket shed by the gate.
how you going to organise new changerooms?....oh...hang on...i know who will do it!
BUT i am not necessarily doubting your clubs ability to hold a final, or GF.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |