by big-whopper » Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:32 pm
by Pag » Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:40 pm
Good bloke Bretty Ellis, be interested to see why he chose Peake over Mitcham?Goldberg wrote:footyfreak wrote:Bdt-strong all last season,fell over in GF.Ins-Nunan,Todd &Sampson,prob go undefeated
Karoonda-will be a better team this year the 2nd under smelt & if muffy plays full season
Peake-Surprise packet,2nd year under N.Barrett,recuited better with Hand,Chubb,Casey,Marret
Murrayville-Also recuited,but will take a while to gel with littie trainings together,wil charge late
Lameroo-lost alot of numbers,hard to make up,strong club,couldnt put them bottom
Pinnaroo-Very unknown,R.Nicholls&Schroder big outs
Add Gregory & Ellis to that list as both are better then any of the 4 mentioned
by Goldberg » Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:53 pm
by jumbo » Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:06 pm
Goldberg wrote:$-)Is why
And Tailem under the new rules & regs from the CFB cant refuse Gregory, unless he is unfinancial
by big-whopper » Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:15 pm
by big-whopper » Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:16 pm
Goldberg wrote:$-)Is why
And Tailem under the new rules & regs from the CFB cant refuse Gregory, unless he is unfinancial
by carey » Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:37 pm
big-whopper wrote:Goldberg wrote:$-)Is why
And Tailem under the new rules & regs from the CFB cant refuse Gregory, unless he is unfinancial
has this been brought in of recent and not valid for when marion tried?
by dragonsphere » Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:34 am
by slug » Fri Apr 16, 2010 4:36 pm
by footyfreak » Fri Apr 16, 2010 7:55 pm
by Footsview » Fri Apr 16, 2010 8:40 pm
Gregs not cleared. Clearance deniedfootyfreak wrote:peake have 4 out tomorrow due to a wedding,gregory clearance ????
by carey » Fri Apr 16, 2010 8:57 pm
Footsview wrote:Gregs not cleared. Clearance deniedfootyfreak wrote:peake have 4 out tomorrow due to a wedding,gregory clearance ????
by Footsview » Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:02 pm
carey wrote:Footsview wrote:Gregs not cleared. Clearance deniedfootyfreak wrote:peake have 4 out tomorrow due to a wedding,gregory clearance ????
and tailem wonder why blokes will never go back there!![]()
hope them wank#rs dont win a game all year d!ckheads
by sick of it » Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:26 pm
carey wrote:Footsview wrote:Gregs not cleared. Clearance deniedfootyfreak wrote:peake have 4 out tomorrow due to a wedding,gregory clearance ????
and tailem wonder why blokes will never go back there!![]()
hope them wank#rs dont win a game all year d!ckheads
by carey » Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:29 pm
by aceman » Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:36 pm
Footsview wrote:Gregs not cleared. Clearance deniedfootyfreak wrote:peake have 4 out tomorrow due to a wedding,gregory clearance ????
by Footsview » Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:50 pm
aceman wrote:Footsview wrote:Gregs not cleared. Clearance deniedfootyfreak wrote:peake have 4 out tomorrow due to a wedding,gregory clearance ????
For what reason?
by big-whopper » Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:47 pm
by Goldberg » Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:55 pm
by carey » Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:56 pm
Goldberg wrote:Clubs have 14 days to reply, on the 13th day they can refuse by contract or Subs oweing directly to the footy club, thats it! However if a club refuses on the basis of subs oweing, it is up to the player to prove he has payed, not the club, therefore if a club wishes to be pricks, the can hold a player for 28 days min.
This is 1 major downfall of the computer revolution happening in country footy
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |