by running defender » Thu Dec 18, 2014 3:42 pm
by cracka » Thu Dec 18, 2014 5:34 pm
running defender wrote:Ok but i thought Onkas and ect were going with their junior programe !!
overthehill wrote:I also read in the Courier this week that Echunga were backing there junior program?
by Look Good In Leather » Thu Dec 18, 2014 6:26 pm
redsox wrote:Looks like we have to wait until Monday for the Echunga saga to be finally over.
by chopper7 » Thu Dec 18, 2014 9:20 pm
running defender wrote:he"s only got to be suspended once more and done and dusted.
by chopper7 » Thu Dec 18, 2014 9:23 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:redsox wrote:Looks like we have to wait until Monday for the Echunga saga to be finally over.
According to Echunga's Facebook, final decision will be given in February and there is an injunction in place until then.
"...injunction til court resumes from its summer holiday, next February."
by Look Good In Leather » Thu Dec 18, 2014 9:35 pm
chopper7 wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:redsox wrote:Looks like we have to wait until Monday for the Echunga saga to be finally over.
According to Echunga's Facebook, final decision will be given in February and there is an injunction in place until then.
"...injunction til court resumes from its summer holiday, next February."
What a joke...... Just hurry up and get a decision so everyone can move on from this mess.
Can we suspend/fine Echunga for bringing the game into disrupute??cause they certainly have
by running defender » Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:50 pm
by running defender » Sun Dec 21, 2014 9:50 pm
by jo172 » Mon Dec 22, 2014 11:05 am
running defender wrote:Big decision tomorrow hopefully the right one is made and the central premier stays where they deserve to be
by Legs Man » Mon Dec 22, 2014 12:58 pm
by redsox » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:05 pm
by always there » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:06 pm
by R. White » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:10 pm
by Legs Man » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:20 pm
by Look Good In Leather » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:28 pm
Legs Man wrote:Being an unbiased decision taking into account all arguments says it all.
Surely the onus now goes back onto the governing body with required changes being actioned.
Echunga were backed into a corner and had no other course of action than the one taken.
By the ruling being made at the highest level this shows that the rules set in place were flawed and not governed correctly on behalf of the clubs.
We can now move on to 2015 with what is hopefully a new lease of life for Hills footy and the correct changes derived for the competition.
by Amateur Footy » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:37 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:Legs Man wrote:Being an unbiased decision taking into account all arguments says it all.
Surely the onus now goes back onto the governing body with required changes being actioned.
Echunga were backed into a corner and had no other course of action than the one taken.
By the ruling being made at the highest level this shows that the rules set in place were flawed and not governed correctly on behalf of the clubs.
We can now move on to 2015 with what is hopefully a new lease of life for Hills footy and the correct changes derived for the competition.
Petty much 2 options:
1) 11 team competition
2) relegate Bridgewater
Assume the clubs will vote on which option they prefer. Surely they would select the first option?
by The Sorce » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:43 pm
by Legs Man » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:47 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |