magpieeagle wrote:I find it hard to understand how a group of grown males can decide the fate of a 14yr olds footy career 4 games left in a season, I was under the standing that junior football was about teaching the rules of the game and to encourage kids to get into sport and out of the house, not to play for bloody sheep stations and be afraid of a player beaning better as a yr goes on through good teaching and coaching just to kick him to the side lines, I doubt very much that this lad will play sport and slip back into the video game mode, I for one am disappointed at this decision and just shows that this league is not in the real world when it comes to junior football or development . For goodness sake we are talking about 14 yr olds not 17 yr olds.
If a decision is to made on a players permit it should be made on june 30th like everything else, not bloody 4 games from finals, so he is tall, well has anyone looked at how tall our fellow association 14yr olds are? piss weak reason. I have found this season with a lot of junior coaches it has been a lot about spite against other players/teams and not the good of junior footy, the league made all junior teams sign a good code of conduct form, has never been adhered to by any club yet including mine, junior footy is about good times and mates, dosent seem to be like that anymore.
I agree the timing stinks. However in the APFL Junior Panel defence, the permit players are progressively monitored and assessed on ability criteria. I guess they thought this lad has improved to the point where the permit conditions don't apply??
On a positive though, I suppose an U17 premiership medal might ease the pain
