


by leonidis » Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:38 am
by eags » Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:03 pm
by eags » Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:15 pm
steiger wrote:lincolnsdirtysecrets wrote:And to Beebs I was one of those players who pulled out of the second XI today and I would rather go fishing so a BIG raspberry back at you too
I don't play cricket but follow the local comps reasonably keenly. Having said that I thought I would put my 2 bobs worth in.
I am astounded at the situation that led to the forfeit by our Assoc.
Firstly I cannot understand why someone wouldn't want to play assoc cricket (those unavailable are excused).
Secondly, why would players get selected in the first place if they didn't want to play and were not going to go if selected. And how long before the match did they know about it and if several days, surely replacements could have been found
Surely the assoc can appoint someone from each club to act as coordinator/co-selector or whatever to get a list of names from their respective Club that are available and therefore prepared to play.
This sitaution has made Port Lincoln cricket look like shite and they need to act to recover lost esteem and put systems in place to ensure it doesn't happen again
by leonidis » Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:38 pm
eags wrote:I think the bus incident would be best kept to those who were there - would be interested to hear what version of events you heard though Leo.
by leonidis » Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:40 pm
eags wrote:steiger wrote:lincolnsdirtysecrets wrote:And to Beebs I was one of those players who pulled out of the second XI today and I would rather go fishing so a BIG raspberry back at you too
I don't play cricket but follow the local comps reasonably keenly. Having said that I thought I would put my 2 bobs worth in.
I am astounded at the situation that led to the forfeit by our Assoc.
Firstly I cannot understand why someone wouldn't want to play assoc cricket (those unavailable are excused).
Secondly, why would players get selected in the first place if they didn't want to play and were not going to go if selected. And how long before the match did they know about it and if several days, surely replacements could have been found
Surely the assoc can appoint someone from each club to act as coordinator/co-selector or whatever to get a list of names from their respective Club that are available and therefore prepared to play.
This sitaution has made Port Lincoln cricket look like shite and they need to act to recover lost esteem and put systems in place to ensure it doesn't happen again
In the weeks leading up to the match, each club side was asked to put forward a list of players available for the game. From this list, an extended squad was selected - out of the 6 clubs only 25 players put their hands up to play. The clubs were then notified of players that would be required to train and play.
From this squad, 9 players pulled out on the Wed prior to the match. Two squad members were apologies, and 9 others turned up to training that night. That night we spent ages ringing around to try and find players available, and only 4 players were found for the B Grade side. The decision was then made to forfeit the B's and those 11 blokes that made the effort were picked in the A Grade.
I realise you can't force players to play association cricket, but it was disappointing that three of the clubs only had a combined two players available for the match.
Personally, I think Henderson Shield in the current format is finished. Three options I see:
- Same format but A Grade only
- Twenty20 comp over Fri night and Sat, with a final played on Sunday (similar to Mortlock)
- Scrap Henderson Shield completely and play a Southern Eyre vs Northern Eyre match as a one-off event
by untapped ability » Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:56 pm
leonidis wrote:eags wrote:I think the bus incident would be best kept to those who were there - would be interested to hear what version of events you heard though Leo.
PM me eags
by overloaded » Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:02 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by untapped ability » Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:42 pm
by lincolnsdirtysecrets » Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:09 am
by overloaded » Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:15 am
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by silicone skyline » Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:18 am
overloaded wrote:Only a day and a half behind is pretty good for a country news service isn't it silicone skyline?
by overloaded » Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:20 am
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by lincolnsdirtysecrets » Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:22 am
by silicone skyline » Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:23 am
by eags » Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:49 am
by untapped ability » Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:04 pm
by Ken Whelan Fan » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:02 pm
by ironknob » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:58 pm
Ken Whelan Fan wrote:I see Rangers have appointed a new coach are they trying to get another
Parkes from TFC ?
rumour is a building job after tuna towing
by plumblb » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:00 pm
by Ken Whelan Fan » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:28 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |