by MONTE CRISTO » Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:29 pm
by spot on » Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:37 pm
MONTE CRISTO wrote:Heard a rumour Ian Perrie is lining up in the HFL next season on quite a substantial salary package. Can anyone confirm that?
by Bat Pad » Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:18 pm
by jumbo20 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:38 pm
by Whiteline » Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:49 pm
Bat Pad wrote:Have heard the GF will be on the 14th of September this year, which is a week earlier than usual. Can anyone confirm?
by Amateur Footy » Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:27 pm
by Bat Pad » Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:23 am
Amateur Footy wrote:I see Mt Barker are advertising for a paid treasurer position! Never seen this before.
Perhaps it's time for an SANFL club to be based there and take some of those sponsorship $$ to keep the league even.
by Amateur Footy » Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:44 am
Bat Pad wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:I see Mt Barker are advertising for a paid treasurer position! Never seen this before.
Perhaps it's time for an SANFL club to be based there and take some of those sponsorship $$ to keep the league even.
League even? I don't think they are quite Man U yet with one A Grade and U13 (I think it was them who won it) in a row.
Hats off to them to be honest, a professional outsider in the role of Treasurer could only be a good thing for them.
But having not seen the advertisement, might it just be a couple/few thousand dollars as a thank you for their time and recovering of travelling costs like a B grade coach would receive? Wouldn't think it would be that uncommon.
by Bat Pad » Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:52 am
Amateur Footy wrote:Bat Pad wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:I see Mt Barker are advertising for a paid treasurer position! Never seen this before.
Perhaps it's time for an SANFL club to be based there and take some of those sponsorship $$ to keep the league even.
League even? I don't think they are quite Man U yet with one A Grade and U13 (I think it was them who won it) in a row.
Hats off to them to be honest, a professional outsider in the role of Treasurer could only be a good thing for them.
But having not seen the advertisement, might it just be a couple/few thousand dollars as a thank you for their time and recovering of travelling costs like a B grade coach would receive? Wouldn't think it would be that uncommon.
It's 20 hrs per week + volunteer work around the club I think, so permanent part time Id say. Sure it's a great thing for them and we'd all do the same in their position.
But is this start of the bigger picture, that Mt Barker needs either another club or even better an SANFL club like Elizabeth? This isn't a crack at MBFC, just noting that their financial position is surley moving well ahead of other clubs and does it matter to other clubs in the HFL?
by Champ » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:14 pm
Bat Pad wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:Bat Pad wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:I see Mt Barker are advertising for a paid treasurer position! Never seen this before.
Perhaps it's time for an SANFL club to be based there and take some of those sponsorship $$ to keep the league even.
League even? I don't think they are quite Man U yet with one A Grade and U13 (I think it was them who won it) in a row.
Hats off to them to be honest, a professional outsider in the role of Treasurer could only be a good thing for them.
But having not seen the advertisement, might it just be a couple/few thousand dollars as a thank you for their time and recovering of travelling costs like a B grade coach would receive? Wouldn't think it would be that uncommon.
It's 20 hrs per week + volunteer work around the club I think, so permanent part time Id say. Sure it's a great thing for them and we'd all do the same in their position.
But is this start of the bigger picture, that Mt Barker needs either another club or even better an SANFL club like Elizabeth? This isn't a crack at MBFC, just noting that their financial position is surley moving well ahead of other clubs and does it matter to other clubs in the HFL?
I think the second team is inevitable. Perhaps it is time for the HFL to seriously start looking at it. I don't believe an SANFL side would be successful, with SANFL clubs already struggling to fill reserves sides I think the SANFL is more likely to reduce clubs than gain. Having said that, perhaps a relocation then. I know Sturt always talk about it. Not sure how much difference that would make to the Roos though, perhaps a little.
by Bat Pad » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:29 pm
by Power From Port » Wed Dec 19, 2012 9:50 pm
Bat Pad wrote:Surely not serious here in saying that Mt Barker could join teh SANFL?! Thats just f-n ridiculous!
by Bat Pad » Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:13 am
Power From Port wrote:Bat Pad wrote:Surely not serious here in saying that Mt Barker could join teh SANFL?! Thats just f-n ridiculous!
No one is saying that. The talk was either the SANFL creating a new club based in Mt Barker (Most likely called Hills or similar), which is an idea that has been floated before. Or a club relocate their home base to Mt Barker, which Sturt have seriously looked at I believe due to their problems with Unley. No suggestion of the Mt Barker Barkeroos leaving the HFL to join the SANFL.
by From The Outer » Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:56 am
by Bat Pad » Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:22 am
From The Outer wrote:Mt Barker once had a powerful A grade cricket team and now only compete in B grade. I would think the club would be enjoying their remarkable run of one premiership and understand the good times never last. There are enough clubs close enough to Mt Barker to cater for any excess players.
by Amateur Footy » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:30 am
Bat Pad wrote:From The Outer wrote:Mt Barker once had a powerful A grade cricket team and now only compete in B grade. I would think the club would be enjoying their remarkable run of one premiership and understand the good times never last. There are enough clubs close enough to Mt Barker to cater for any excess players.
I agree with this for 2013, but 10 years down the track with new developments etc. I think it will be able to sustain 2 teams easily. Best for the HFL to start thinking about it now so they get it right.
by Lakesider » Sat Dec 22, 2012 4:57 pm
by Power From Port » Wed Dec 26, 2012 10:53 pm
Lakesider wrote:Are there still plans in place to move the Mt Barker oval to bald hills Rd alongside the golf club or have finaces killed that idea off?
by Biggsy » Thu Dec 27, 2012 10:03 pm
Power From Port wrote:Lakesider wrote:Are there still plans in place to move the Mt Barker oval to bald hills Rd alongside the golf club or have finaces killed that idea off?
There are still Plans in place for a relocation but don't expect to see it within the next 10 years min
by jumbo20 » Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:35 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |