by outsmarts » Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:37 pm
by geep8370 » Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:38 am
supercoach wrote:Hey Atlantis you may not be so smug when your little castle crumbles. Have heard that 7 teams from Hfl and 3 to 5 from sfl have agreed in pricipal to develop the concept of a new league. No hfl west of the freeway within a year or 2. Hfl have lost the ability to run 2 divs effectively especially with juniors and the alternative is very attractive from the info i have been privvy to. Sponsors are around and happy to support I believe. Mickey Taylor and his mates may want to go back from where they came to umpire a decent game !
by Justquietly » Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:26 am
by Whiteline » Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:57 am
supercoach wrote:Hey Atlantis you may not be so smug when your little castle crumbles. Have heard that 7 teams from Hfl and 3 to 5 from sfl have agreed in pricipal to develop the concept of a new league. No hfl west of the freeway within a year or 2. Hfl have lost the ability to run 2 divs effectively especially with juniors and the alternative is very attractive from the info i have been privvy to. Sponsors are around and happy to support I believe. Mickey Taylor and his mates may want to go back from where they came to umpire a decent game !
by Bat Pad » Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:40 pm
supercoach wrote:Hey Atlantis you may not be so smug when your little castle crumbles. Have heard that 7 teams from Hfl and 3 to 5 from sfl have agreed in pricipal to develop the concept of a new league. No hfl west of the freeway within a year or 2. Hfl have lost the ability to run 2 divs effectively especially with juniors and the alternative is very attractive from the info i have been privvy to. Sponsors are around and happy to support I believe. Mickey Taylor and his mates may want to go back from where they came to umpire a decent game !
by Sniper » Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:44 pm
outsmarts wrote:Don’t understand what the issue is with hills footy, from what I saw in last week’s finals this competition is alive and well. No doubt div 2 needs attention before we lose clubs like Birdwood but div 1 seems to me to be really strong. The standard is good and will only get better the longer TV are up and when Mt Lofty can get over the financial woes with their young players they will be finals bound once again. All clubs except maybe bridgy who may leave this year anyway, seem to be on the right track. The last thing this comp needs is to separate, Blackwood needs strong clubs like Mt barker, Handorf and Uraidla. Mt Lofty and Ironbank the same. Why separate a good comp? When it would be even easier to fix a few slight problems and concerns that the clubs have? Stop your winging and start helping the comp we are in by providing solutions. Echunga in bridgy out would only strengthen the comp but that’s up to the Echunga board to decide on if they will want to jump up, with div2 starting to fall it would be a wise move for them. Re the umpire’s situation, I think there needs to an overhaul and start getting ex players into the umpiring game, these guys that have never played before over umpire the game way too much for finals. Hopefully this week they give a better account of themselves. Let’s just hope Taylor doesn’t get a final and ruin the spectacle trying to influence the game as he does.
by has been » Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:52 pm
by Whiteline » Fri Sep 07, 2012 4:40 pm
by Afterthesiren » Fri Sep 07, 2012 4:54 pm
Whiteline wrote:So Has Been.........are the teams rumoured to be going to the SFL Bridgy, Lofty, IB and the Woods? Is that what you are suggesting? Any others?
What are the alleged benefits put forward?
by Redfern07 » Fri Sep 07, 2012 4:58 pm
has been wrote:Who are the 4 hfl clubs now seriously looking at SFL. They are sick to death of the Chronies and the boys club running the hfl. SFL president I believe is bending over backwards. From what I know the hfl wont be advised by 2 certain clubs till feb next year. SFL will become 2 divisions with 10 in each. Interesting times ahead. Suggest the hfl needs new leadership.
by Straight Line » Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:07 pm
by has been » Fri Sep 07, 2012 6:02 pm
by vics01 » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:12 pm
by Afterthesiren » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:26 pm
vics01 wrote:I don't believe it will be that easy for clubs to just decide we are going to another league. I would think the SACFL will have to approve any changes.
Secondly I don't think Hills clubs would want to start in Div 2 of the SFL. What I mean by this is that SFL clubs would have to vote and given they can't sort it out now with clubs volunteering to be Div 2. I can hardly see them voting to be a Div 2 club and letting a Hills club go to DIV 1. Unfortunately SELF INTEREST will over rule common sense.
Don't think the grass is any greener with regard to how the SFL is run either. SACFL will not do any favours for the SFL as the Board is always at war with them.
by vics01 » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:42 pm
ATS
A club is not bound by a league, a club pays to be in a league, a club can come and go from a league. The league just has to accept their application. The CFL have no power over this.
by fisho mcspaz » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:45 pm
by supercoach » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:53 pm
by From The Outer » Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:36 pm
by old fullback » Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:52 pm
From The Outer wrote:Dont tell me the Barkerwobbles are back!!!
by Whiteline » Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:23 pm
From The Outer wrote:Dont tell me the Barkerwobbles are back!!!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |