by G.O.A.T » Thu May 03, 2012 9:46 am
by BAYSRULE » Thu May 03, 2012 10:59 am
BJ Ernest wrote:Hardly_super wrote:I played in the game but there was not a lot of talk about this so called incident on the weekend form the Mclaren side of things!
Sound like it must have happended though as a few posters seemed to have witnessed it, a bit weird that the Umpire felt the need to report but not follow it through?
Surely the Tribunal doest look favourably on the trip to Victor on a cold Tuesday night for nothing.
HS the trip to Victor alone when im assuming most if not all umpires live well north of there doesnt appeal to anybody. We hear of this happening a bit that the umpire never shows therefore the player just gets off, whether they're guilty or not surely if theres an incident that warrants a report, or a hearing it needs to be booked in so the umpire can attend, and therefore the penalties can be issues correctly. Sounds like a non event, move on.
This weeks games throw up some interesting ones, and another round of working out whos going to be a challenger this year and who will be making up the numbers. Good start to the season!
by PK12 » Thu May 03, 2012 11:00 am
G.O.A.T wrote:give him the season not like we need him anyway!
by One Eyed » Thu May 03, 2012 11:07 am
by field of dreams » Thu May 03, 2012 11:13 am
BAYSRULE wrote:My thoughts... It is making the whole report system a bit silly .. firstly who has the right to report.. Is this written somewhere. Secondly with the Umpire not showing opens up another new can or worms. What happens when there is a blatant punch / incident in say a B Grade match that is umpired by Club umpires which does happen a lot. So he is reported by his umpire as he has to as its blatant... The Club umpire doesnt show to tribunal so his mate doesnt get slammed. Doesnt make any sense with all this new mandatory. There has to be some rules in place. The Umpire should be made compulsory to show at tribunal or face a fine himself. OR have another sessin on the Thursday....
by BAYSRULE » Thu May 03, 2012 11:34 am
G.O.A.T wrote:give him the season not like we need him anyway!
by BJ Ernest » Thu May 03, 2012 12:02 pm
by G.O.A.T » Thu May 03, 2012 3:30 pm
by LuvsFooty » Thu May 03, 2012 11:58 pm
BAYSRULE wrote:G.O.A.T wrote:give him the season not like we need him anyway!
Top bit of "team work" happening here ....![]()
by neverwas neverwillbe » Fri May 04, 2012 1:29 am
by BAYSRULE » Fri May 04, 2012 9:09 am
neverwas neverwillbe wrote:Good to see that the GSFL have changed the rules mid season. One runner only intead of two (AFL rules) after one minor hiccup. Interchange steward to be reintroduced. Clubs to lose more volunteers in one area and then having to look for more for mundane unneccessary jobs. Top Stuff.
by field of dreams » Fri May 04, 2012 10:12 am
neverwas neverwillbe wrote:Good to see that the GSFL have changed the rules mid season. One runner only intead of two (AFL rules) after one minor hiccup. Interchange steward to be reintroduced. Clubs to lose more volunteers in one area and then having to look for more for mundane unneccessary jobs. Top Stuff.
by BAYSRULE » Fri May 04, 2012 11:29 am
field of dreams wrote:neverwas neverwillbe wrote:Good to see that the GSFL have changed the rules mid season. One runner only intead of two (AFL rules) after one minor hiccup. Interchange steward to be reintroduced. Clubs to lose more volunteers in one area and then having to look for more for mundane unneccessary jobs. Top Stuff.
Was the 'hiccup' at the Bay/Victor game? There was one there when 2 runners were sent out at the same time (they and the coaches etc were obviously unaware of the rules). Sure it was wrong but it was pointed out to them by the oppostion bench and then by a league official, and it really wasn't a big drama.
I note under "Rules taken from Minutes" on SP:
10. A Team is permitted to have two runners provided they are both nominated on the Teamsheet and that only one runner is permitted on the field during play at any one time. Penalty following report:- a warning; or fine of $200; or Team suspension from using two runners as determined by the League Commissioners.
Instead they change the rules????
As for re-introducing the interchange steward - WTF? Love to hear the reasoning behind that!
by neverwas neverwillbe » Fri May 04, 2012 11:39 am
BAYSRULE wrote:field of dreams wrote:neverwas neverwillbe wrote:Good to see that the GSFL have changed the rules mid season. One runner only intead of two (AFL rules) after one minor hiccup. Interchange steward to be reintroduced. Clubs to lose more volunteers in one area and then having to look for more for mundane unneccessary jobs. Top Stuff.
Was the 'hiccup' at the Bay/Victor game? There was one there when 2 runners were sent out at the same time (they and the coaches etc were obviously unaware of the rules). Sure it was wrong but it was pointed out to them by the oppostion bench and then by a league official, and it really wasn't a big drama.
I note under "Rules taken from Minutes" on SP:
10. A Team is permitted to have two runners provided they are both nominated on the Teamsheet and that only one runner is permitted on the field during play at any one time. Penalty following report:- a warning; or fine of $200; or Team suspension from using two runners as determined by the League Commissioners.
Instead they change the rules????
As for re-introducing the interchange steward - WTF? Love to hear the reasoning behind that!
SO I think you should get your Pres onto this as we have and start making some noise... It needs to be a united front on all the Clubs. IIf GSFL wnatan interchange stewart they can provide one and pay him...
by Muffler » Fri May 04, 2012 12:16 pm
neverwas neverwillbe wrote:Good to see that the GSFL have changed the rules mid season. One runner only intead of two (AFL rules) after one minor hiccup. Interchange steward to be reintroduced. Clubs to lose more volunteers in one area and then having to look for more for mundane unneccessary jobs. Top Stuff.
by JOHNYGASTEV » Fri May 04, 2012 12:36 pm
by LuvsFooty » Fri May 04, 2012 1:11 pm
BAYSRULE wrote:neverwas neverwillbe wrote:Good to see that the GSFL have changed the rules mid season. One runner only intead of two (AFL rules) after one minor hiccup. Interchange steward to be reintroduced. Clubs to lose more volunteers in one area and then having to look for more for mundane unneccessary jobs. Top Stuff.
I totally agree with this and would love to hear LFs take on this too. Again I wanna know HOW they can change the rules like that without it going to a delegates meeting... Isnt the league all about Delegates deciding.. (and not just one or two at the top).. Also with the bloody interchange.. How the hell is someone supposed to keep up with the fast paced A grade coaches with all of their rotations.. I can see it ending in heart ache.. and its not just a job you can give to some joe bloe... It is a specialised job.. I can see this causing problems..
Are we going backwards as a league with all this crap... Just need to get the rules sorted so there is no grey areas and move forward.. Not go back 5 years.
by field of dreams » Fri May 04, 2012 1:26 pm
JOHNYGASTEV wrote:is arren harvey playing or what ? nick williams is really keen on playing on him
by livefooty » Fri May 04, 2012 3:40 pm
PK12 wrote:G.O.A.T wrote:give him the season not like we need him anyway!
Definately saw some players in your B grade that would warrant a spot over him.... Definately not up to A grade standard anyway! Whats happening with Dean Mckinlay? I saw him running around in the B grade but heard he may be working away?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |