tiger07andbeyond wrote:I would like clarification on that comment OnSong. cheers, you can PM me if you like.
i thought you would be able to understand this statement T07 without explanation.
by tiger08 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:29 pm
tiger07andbeyond wrote:I would like clarification on that comment OnSong. cheers, you can PM me if you like.
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
by Media Park » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:31 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by tangles2k9 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:38 pm
demonball wrote:Ken Whelan Fan wrote:Your Right Bombers Boy the Bilney Boys are back !
Amazing how MP seem to find employment for players
late in the season![]()
When are you putting the boots back on?
I saw you on Sat.
Whats employment got to do with it??
If its after 30th June you cant transfer.
Another one of those rules that the league let MPFC break...one set of rules for them..one set of rules for everyone else
by Media Park » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:41 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Media Park » Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:00 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Ken Whelan Fan » Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:25 am
by aceman » Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:30 am
Ken Whelan Fan wrote:Let me guess the new "bona fide" residential address is Tobruk Tce
Welcome back to Port Lincoln Malcolm Miller![]()
That rule is a joke and has been abused for years by one club in particular
I remember years ago Milky came back and played in a B grade grand final.
Last nights meeting was a warm and welcoming event in fact it was so warm
that my glass of water was boiling!
The upshot was that a motion to withdraw the requirement of BFC to front the Commissioners
tonight was defeated. Waybacks and Marble Range joined with Mallee Park.
the vote was three all with the Chairman having the unenviable task of casting
the deciding vote.
MP sent in a letter asking that they be compensated to the Tune of $3000 (approx)
for the no show of Bostons
and asking that all other teams have a bye against Bostons to even up the round
and the fact that all their players missed out on the opportunity to receive votes.
by tiger08 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:40 am
aceman wrote:Ken Whelan Fan wrote:Let me guess the new "bona fide" residential address is Tobruk Tce
Welcome back to Port Lincoln Malcolm Miller![]()
That rule is a joke and has been abused for years by one club in particular
I remember years ago Milky came back and played in a B grade grand final.
Last nights meeting was a warm and welcoming event in fact it was so warm
that my glass of water was boiling!
The upshot was that a motion to withdraw the requirement of BFC to front the Commissioners
tonight was defeated. Waybacks and Marble Range joined with Mallee Park.
the vote was three all with the Chairman having the unenviable task of casting
the deciding vote.
MP sent in a letter asking that they be compensated to the Tune of $3000 (approx)
for the no show of Bostons
and asking that all other teams have a bye against Bostons to even up the round
and the fact that all their players missed out on the opportunity to receive votes.
It appears all is not well over that way!![]()
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
by Media Park » Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:11 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Justquietly » Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:26 am
tiger08 wrote:aceman wrote:Ken Whelan Fan wrote:Let me guess the new "bona fide" residential address is Tobruk Tce
Welcome back to Port Lincoln Malcolm Miller![]()
That rule is a joke and has been abused for years by one club in particular
I remember years ago Milky came back and played in a B grade grand final.
Last nights meeting was a warm and welcoming event in fact it was so warm
that my glass of water was boiling!
The upshot was that a motion to withdraw the requirement of BFC to front the Commissioners
tonight was defeated. Waybacks and Marble Range joined with Mallee Park.
the vote was three all with the Chairman having the unenviable task of casting
the deciding vote.
MP sent in a letter asking that they be compensated to the Tune of $3000 (approx)
for the no show of Bostons
and asking that all other teams have a bye against Bostons to even up the round
and the fact that all their players missed out on the opportunity to receive votes.
It appears all is not well over that way!![]()
all well if your Mallee Park, when you have politics on your side.
$3000 what's that for 10 stubbies and 1000 pie and pasties i think not
i'm amazed how quick the other clubs got in to bed with MP over this yet couldn't give us the time of day when we required their support, guess every dog has it's day
by plumblb » Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:45 am
by plumblb » Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:49 am
by demonball » Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:53 am
by Media Park » Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:56 am
plumblb wrote:I back our clubs decision together with Marble Range - we were not there that day. Why should we decide the fate of Bostons. It is entirely a league matter.
I am an older bloke and again I have no sympathy for Bostons - Bostons were the dirtiest (on and off the ball) team I have ever played against. They have been involved in some of the worst incidents in footy I have ever seen.............. and then they expect everyone to support them.
Again I say short memories - ask any senior people in your club an they will tell you. The rules are the rules and on eclub is not bigger than the league.
Wear the consequences and get on with it!
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Ken Whelan Fan » Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:57 am
by tiger08 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:27 pm
plumblb wrote:I back our clubs decision together with Marble Range - we were not there that day. Why should we decide the fate of Bostons. It is entirely a league matter.
I am an older bloke and again I have no sympathy for Bostons - Bostons were the dirtiest (on and off the ball) team I have ever played against. They have been involved in some of the worst incidents in footy I have ever seen.............. and then they expect everyone to support them.
Again I say short memories - ask any senior people in your club an they will tell you. The rules are the rules and on eclub is not bigger than the league.
Wear the consequences and get on with it!
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
by doggone » Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:28 pm
by westcoastpanther » Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:45 pm
plumblb wrote:I back our clubs decision together with Marble Range - we were not there that day. Why should we decide the fate of Bostons. It is entirely a league matter.
I am an older bloke and again I have no sympathy for Bostons - Bostons were the dirtiest (on and off the ball) team I have ever played against. They have been involved in some of the worst incidents in footy I have ever seen.............. and then they expect everyone to support them.
Again I say short memories - ask any senior people in your club an they will tell you. The rules are the rules and on eclub is not bigger than the league.
Wear the consequences and get on with it!
by overloaded » Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:48 pm
tiger08 wrote:plumblb wrote:I back our clubs decision together with Marble Range - we were not there that day. Why should we decide the fate of Bostons. It is entirely a league matter.
I am an older bloke and again I have no sympathy for Bostons - Bostons were the dirtiest (on and off the ball) team I have ever played against. They have been involved in some of the worst incidents in footy I have ever seen.............. and then they expect everyone to support them.
Again I say short memories - ask any senior people in your club an they will tell you. The rules are the rules and on eclub is not bigger than the league.
Wear the consequences and get on with it!
that's fine your point on the past is noted, it's been flogged to death.
Do you think we all are proud of of the thugery that went on and it doesn't effect us when you label all BFC supportors as one? I am one of those senior people in the club and I thought our efforts in changing our club over the past four years we had finally turned a corner, well i know we have and i'm sorry you can't see that i guess we just to have to try harder. Must be great to have the perfect club without no bad history or issues.
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by Media Park » Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:00 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |