



by Media Park » Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:03 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by tiger08 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:31 am
Media Park wrote:red headed bald headed...
![]()
![]()
![]()
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
by tiger08 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:39 am
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
by Media Park » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:06 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Ken Whelan Fan » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:09 am
by Media Park » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:16 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by tiger08 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:24 am
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
by Media Park » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:27 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Media Park » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:39 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by overloaded » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:45 am
Media Park wrote:red headed bald headed...![]()
![]()
![]()
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by daicos » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:49 am
by Media Park » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:09 am
daicos wrote:What did everone think of JB's comments in the paper this morning?
I think the journalist should have used the word allegedly marble park in that case. They built up the story saying Bostons could get kicked out.
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by untapped ability » Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:25 pm
by daicos » Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:32 pm
Media Park wrote:daicos wrote:What did everone think of JB's comments in the paper this morning?
I think the journalist should have used the word allegedly marble park in that case. They built up the story saying Bostons could get kicked out.
Freedom of the press...![]()
I'm still struggling with something...
Bostons have made what is a noble stand, in regards to the safety and welfare of their players and supporters, and they are being put through the ringer...
Mallee Park have been the "problem child" of the league forever...
It isn't Marble Range that go to Ravendale and wipe faeces over the toilet walls.
It isn't Waybacks who leave used nappies around other clubs grounds.
It isn't Lincoln South who threaten other clubs juniors on and off the field.
It isn't Tasmans who leave young people in fear of going to the football, going to school, and living their lives, for fear of physical injury.
It is Mallee Park. The time has come to say that we, as a community, do not accept these actions.
by Justquietly » Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:42 pm
Media Park wrote:daicos wrote:What did everone think of JB's comments in the paper this morning?
I think the journalist should have used the word allegedly marble park in that case. They built up the story saying Bostons could get kicked out.
Freedom of the press...![]()
I'm still struggling with something...
Bostons have made what is a noble stand, in regards to the safety and welfare of their players and supporters, and they are being put through the ringer...
Mallee Park have been the "problem child" of the league forever...
It isn't Marble Range that go to Ravendale and wipe faeces over the toilet walls.
It isn't Waybacks who leave used nappies around other clubs grounds.
It isn't Lincoln South who threaten other clubs juniors on and off the field.
It isn't Tasmans who leave young people in fear of going to the football, going to school, and living their lives, for fear of physical injury.
It is Mallee Park. The time has come to say that we, as a community, do not accept these actions.
by tiger08 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:13 pm
daicos wrote:Media Park wrote:daicos wrote:What did everone think of JB's comments in the paper this morning?
I think the journalist should have used the word allegedly marble park in that case. They built up the story saying Bostons could get kicked out.
Freedom of the press...![]()
I'm still struggling with something...
Bostons have made what is a noble stand, in regards to the safety and welfare of their players and supporters, and they are being put through the ringer...
Mallee Park have been the "problem child" of the league forever...
It isn't Marble Range that go to Ravendale and wipe faeces over the toilet walls.
It isn't Waybacks who leave used nappies around other clubs grounds.
It isn't Lincoln South who threaten other clubs juniors on and off the field.
It isn't Tasmans who leave young people in fear of going to the football, going to school, and living their lives, for fear of physical injury.
It is Mallee Park. The time has come to say that we, as a community, do not accept these actions.
Rules are rules marble park and we just cant forfiet every time we have an issue. The PLFL need to come down on this hard. Noble is not the word I would use
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
by OnSong » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:20 pm
by OnSong » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:23 pm
by overloaded » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:01 pm
OnSong wrote:But indigenous culture and Mallee Park culture differs 100 per cent.
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by OnSong » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:04 pm
overloaded wrote:OnSong wrote:But indigenous culture and Mallee Park culture differs 100 per cent.
In what way?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |