by another grub » Wed May 28, 2008 12:43 pm
mal wrote:I like to think of us as an allied team
by steiger » Wed May 28, 2008 12:47 pm
tiger07andbeyond wrote:Why should souths get the points due to peckers stuff up. why not distribute the points between the other 5 sides so we all get .2 of a point. Its not going to benefit souths at all as they wont win another game anyway
by steakn » Wed May 28, 2008 2:18 pm
by overloaded » Wed May 28, 2008 2:33 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by coyote ugly » Wed May 28, 2008 2:56 pm
by tiger07andbeyond » Wed May 28, 2008 3:25 pm
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.
by coyote ugly » Wed May 28, 2008 3:29 pm
tiger07andbeyond wrote:that seems very harsh CU
by City Mad Hustler » Wed May 28, 2008 4:04 pm
by coyote ugly » Wed May 28, 2008 4:18 pm
by City Mad Hustler » Wed May 28, 2008 4:30 pm
coyote ugly wrote:coming from someone who knows nothing about the game that statment didnt even register with me huss. I would expect that from sasquatch not you. very poor
what we should do is stop all these whinging b grade footballers!
by coyote ugly » Wed May 28, 2008 4:48 pm
City Mad Hustler wrote:Meh the only thing i dont know about the game is what a bloody SWOOSK is.
!
by City Mad Hustler » Wed May 28, 2008 5:04 pm
coyote ugly wrote:City Mad Hustler wrote:Meh the only thing i dont know about the game is what a bloody SWOOSK is.
!
So your coaching AFL then?
sasqautch was right you are a bit of a tool.
by steiger » Wed May 28, 2008 5:09 pm
City Mad Hustler wrote:Certainly are coaching AFL. afl.com dream team
by tiger07andbeyond » Thu May 29, 2008 10:51 am
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.
by City Mad Hustler » Thu May 29, 2008 11:17 am
tiger07andbeyond wrote:The Port Lincoln side in the paper looks good. Watherston is an addition, he should have been in the May game.
by another grub » Thu May 29, 2008 11:44 am
mal wrote:I like to think of us as an allied team
by ravendale rulz » Thu May 29, 2008 12:02 pm
by overloaded » Thu May 29, 2008 12:16 pm
ravendale rulz wrote:. If PL want a good contest then Bascombe should come into calculations as there aren't many tougher and hard at it players than him on the EP.
.
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by steiger » Thu May 29, 2008 12:41 pm
another grub wrote:No Mooney, Vonow or D Dunn???
Who's our best ruckman in town? I see that as a problem for us.....
by overloaded » Thu May 29, 2008 12:56 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
Football
Other Footy Leagues
Country Footy
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

