by steakn » Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:42 pm
by leonidis » Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:38 pm
by City Mad Hustler » Thu May 01, 2008 9:30 am
tiger07andbeyond wrote:westpac go through plenty of staff, each time I do my banking they have new staff.
The issue at the club has been dealt with in house and I am suprised that you have heard about it ol as only 4 people knew about it.
by tiger07andbeyond » Thu May 01, 2008 10:08 am
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.
by steiger » Thu May 01, 2008 10:26 am
by City Mad Hustler » Thu May 01, 2008 10:43 am
tiger07andbeyond wrote:because one of the 4 told me. But I didnt get a name, I was wondering if you knew or had heard anything at training?
by City Mad Hustler » Thu May 01, 2008 10:44 am
steiger wrote:Bostons must be very disappointed that Rhys Marsh and Jack Arbon have moved across to Waybacks
by coyote ugly » Thu May 01, 2008 10:44 am
by overloaded » Thu May 01, 2008 10:58 am
steiger wrote:Bostons must be very disappointed that Rhys Marsh and Jack Arbon have moved across to Waybacks
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by City Mad Hustler » Thu May 01, 2008 11:13 am
by coyote ugly » Thu May 01, 2008 11:47 am
by City Mad Hustler » Thu May 01, 2008 12:39 pm
coyote ugly wrote:why put it in blueys coloumn in the paper? what is all that about? sounds like rumblings at ground zero.
by coyote ugly » Thu May 01, 2008 12:44 pm
by City Mad Hustler » Thu May 01, 2008 2:02 pm
coyote ugly wrote:they are hardly going to broadcast that someone (or 2) have been sackedand let people think that bostons havent changed
by steakn » Thu May 01, 2008 2:09 pm
by bluestheboy » Thu May 01, 2008 2:22 pm
You will find that all clubs (I know we do) adopt a zero tolerance policy...we just don't feel the need to advertise it...really should be a given.steakn wrote:I reckon ML is spot on with that policy, it would be great if all Lincoln sides if not all ep sides adopted the same approach. If it works it will be a winner for everyone. I'm pretty impressed!
by overloaded » Thu May 01, 2008 2:26 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by Scooby » Thu May 01, 2008 2:55 pm
by City Mad Hustler » Thu May 01, 2008 2:59 pm
overloaded wrote:why would a club just come out and state that if nothing happened?
and why bostons?
seems strange to me
i think there is more then meets they eye
by City Mad Hustler » Thu May 01, 2008 3:01 pm
Scooby wrote:Im with you Bluesy.. Would have thought that most clubs would have a zero tolerance and that it is a given.. Saying that, I think that ML & the Bostons hierachy (D Mc etc.) have decided to go on the front foot and advise the community that they and others at the club are really working hard to turn around the fortunes of the Tigers and the perception it may have amongst the football community. Good luck to them... Speaking to ML he really wanted to make sure that Bostons was an inviting place for opposition players & supporters to enjoy a beer and chat after a game....
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
Football
Other Footy Leagues
Country Footy
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

