by oneoutoneback » Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:28 pm
by oneoutoneback » Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:41 pm
by skipper » Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:26 am
oneoutoneback wrote:skipper wrote:JD never had a problem with Bay 13 just reporting the facts. Can confirm though that Leal was told on Tuesday night at Freeling that he will not be required as coach next season, that is fact. Apparently he is very disapointed and did want to go on next year as some of the import rules where going to fall into his favour. It sounds as though Freeling will have to build from the bottom up as all imports from this season are walking with him.
Skip
I have heard the same story tonight from a mate over that way and apparently the players are not happy. I was told that becasue of this decision they could loose 5-6 key local players for next year.
by skipper » Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:50 am
oneoutoneback wrote:John Doe wrote:skipper wrote:Wow I missed a massive forum over the past 24 hours. Firstly I agree with proper ground selection for the GF but no home ground advantage. I would like to see the finals shared around more evenly though, Blockie you would have to agree with this, how many have you hosted in the last 10 years? 1 or 2, while nuri get heaps. Speaking of nuri, there was a meeting on tues night between the BLG, Barossa FC and the Nuri parks (not Nuri FC) about the bad behavior of the barossa cheer squad at the game held at nuri. Do not know the outcome but the Nuri parks certainly wants no part in the finals series this year. Apparently it got pretty messy with bay 13 and the caravan park has put in a massive complaint and wants it dealt with.
As for O'Connor that sounds like a complete load of BS, and if it is true can you imagine the Freeling locals mood when their hero Leske is ousted as captain and replaced by an import chasing cash, I don't think so. I know this site is here to spread rumours but that is BS.
As for the discussion about 4th spot I think it really matters now, the GF will be between the blockies and barossa and they will slaughter all in front of them.
Skip
I don't know about the rest of you but I reckon bay 13 are OK, it adds atmosphere. Let the goon squad stay!
Skip do you really think freeling will be opposed to any cash chasing import, pretty much sums up their squad of the last four years until 2008 but the whole O'Connor rumour is crap anyway
Barossa Dist are at the top of the list of clubs that have had cash chasing imports over the last few years or do they play for free out that way??? In fact any club that has paid a player has them...
by NO-MERCY » Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:27 pm
skipper wrote: The update that I have got is that Freeling did approach O'Connor but he has most certainly rejected their offer and is sticking to his CONTRACT at Kilburn. Apparently he was not to happy with the approach and simply told Freeling that the 2 clubs he hates in the BLG are Willaston and Freeling and they could jam it. You heard it here first and this comes straight from a very direct source. Perhaps a few of the punters on this site who maybe involved with the morning radio show and other forms of media (Leader & Herald) could try and 100% verify this.
Skip
Skip
by holden06 » Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:08 am
NO-MERCY wrote:skipper wrote: The update that I have got is that Freeling did approach O'Connor but he has most certainly rejected their offer and is sticking to his CONTRACT at Kilburn. Apparently he was not to happy with the approach and simply told Freeling that the 2 clubs he hates in the BLG are Willaston and Freeling and they could jam it. You heard it here first and this comes straight from a very direct source. Perhaps a few of the punters on this site who maybe involved with the morning radio show and other forms of media (Leader & Herald) could try and 100% verify this.
Skip
Skip
Yes Skip, mine was from a very direct source aswell, all of it 100%.
by The Duke » Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:36 pm
skipper wrote:oneoutoneback wrote:skipper wrote:JD never had a problem with Bay 13 just reporting the facts. Can confirm though that Leal was told on Tuesday night at Freeling that he will not be required as coach next season, that is fact. Apparently he is very disapointed and did want to go on next year as some of the import rules where going to fall into his favour. It sounds as though Freeling will have to build from the bottom up as all imports from this season are walking with him.
Skip
I have heard the same story tonight from a mate over that way and apparently the players are not happy. I was told that becasue of this decision they could loose 5-6 key local players for next year.
Yep on the money there champ, not happy campers at all, the club is divided with half sticking with Leal the other wanting him gone, so it is really a no win situation for the club. The update that I have got is that Freeling did approach O'Connor but he has most certainly rejected their offer and is sticking to his CONTRACT at Kilburn. Apparently he was not to happy with the approach and simply told Freeling that the 2 clubs he hates in the BLG are Willaston and Freeling and they could jam it. You heard it here first and this comes straight from a very direct source. Perhaps a few of the punters on this site who maybe involved with the morning radio show and other forms of media (Leader & Herald) could try and 100% verify this.
Skip
Skip
by John Doe » Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:41 pm
by The Duke » Mon Jul 21, 2008 4:29 pm
John Doe wrote:Hey Duke, after what they just did to Leal, would you want to be a part of that club?. It's a disgrace!, the committee are as much to blame for the current situation as they would have signed off on all the imports etc over the years. It could have been handled with with more class than this, I think he deserved that much.
by The Duke » Mon Jul 21, 2008 4:34 pm
The Duke wrote:John Doe wrote:Hey Duke, after what they just did to Leal, would you want to be a part of that club?. It's a disgrace!, the committee are as much to blame for the current situation as they would have signed off on all the imports etc over the years. It could have been handled with with more class than this, I think he deserved that much.
Gday JD, True - I dont see why they couldn't part company amicably, as I said thats because most people dont know when to stop and there becomes a point when someone wants to get in first. Im sure we havn't heard the end of this.
by John Doe » Mon Jul 21, 2008 4:36 pm
The Duke wrote:The Duke wrote:John Doe wrote:Hey Duke, after what they just did to Leal, would you want to be a part of that club?. It's a disgrace!, the committee are as much to blame for the current situation as they would have signed off on all the imports etc over the years. It could have been handled with with more class than this, I think he deserved that much.
Gday JD, True - I dont see why they couldn't part company amicably, as I said thats because most people dont know when to stop and there becomes a point when someone wants to get in first. Im sure we havn't heard the end of this.
The Lealgate Inquiry.
by The Duke » Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:05 pm
John Doe wrote:The Duke wrote:The Duke wrote:John Doe wrote:Hey Duke, after what they just did to Leal, would you want to be a part of that club?. It's a disgrace!, the committee are as much to blame for the current situation as they would have signed off on all the imports etc over the years. It could have been handled with with more class than this, I think he deserved that much.
Gday JD, True - I dont see why they couldn't part company amicably, as I said thats because most people dont know when to stop and there becomes a point when someone wants to get in first. Im sure we havn't heard the end of this.
The Lealgate Inquiry.
Be interesting to see where he ends up, perhaps he can be Nobby's permanent association coach?
by John Doe » Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:16 pm
by Edgar05 » Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:43 pm
John Doe wrote:[
Be interesting to see where he ends up, perhaps he can be Nobby's permanent association coach?
by The Duke » Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:49 pm
John Doe wrote:[
Be interesting to see where he ends up, perhaps he can be Nobby's permanent association coach?
by skipper » Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:11 pm
by John Doe » Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:15 pm
skipper wrote:Hear what you are saying Duke about building a team with locals but unfortantely the BLG has made a rod for their own back over the past 3 years and all sides are forced to import some quality talent to try and win. I know some won't agree but I look at the blockie list and they have really imported 3 or 4 good players and have a lot of young local lads starting to peak and some of the older ones come back (Kieboom & Baird). Kapunda did a similar thing for their 2 flags but then Freeling and Barossa just took it to another level and really have a bit to answer for. Whats the go with Leal is going to continue on for the rest of the season or is he going to walk?, he should walk after what they did to him. I haven't been the biggest Leal fan but he deserved better and from what I hear the committee has coped a massive bomb from a lot of Freeling supporters, perhaps its time for some of them to go, time might be up Mal (Mal is actually a bloody good bloke).
Skip
by John Doe » Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:20 pm
by skipper » Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:23 pm
by old moz » Mon Jul 21, 2008 8:54 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |