carey wrote:
I think you'll find one of them was half the problem out there.
Took Scotty 'Jughead' Norton and co a fair amount of time to turn the club around and get back on track.
Off field?
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Sep 02, 2019 2:19 pm
carey wrote:
I think you'll find one of them was half the problem out there.
Took Scotty 'Jughead' Norton and co a fair amount of time to turn the club around and get back on track.
by mighty hounds » Mon Sep 02, 2019 2:23 pm
carey wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Cougar wrote:
I've heard it could have been the first now LM. Certainly didn't happen 25 years ago
No probz, I work with a past player from Kersbrook who's brother still plays, he said this morning it was 25 years ago, I had no real knowledge.
I thought Gummy's would've been up and about a bit when Ashby and Quinno were running amok out there.
I think you'll find one of them was half the problem out there.
Took Scotty 'Jughead' Norton and co a fair amount of time to turn the club around and get back on track.
by Cougar » Mon Sep 02, 2019 3:34 pm
by cracka » Mon Sep 02, 2019 4:10 pm
carey wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Cougar wrote:
I've heard it could have been the first now LM. Certainly didn't happen 25 years ago
No probz, I work with a past player from Kersbrook who's brother still plays, he said this morning it was 25 years ago, I had no real knowledge.
I thought Gummy's would've been up and about a bit when Ashby and Quinno were running amok out there.
I think you'll find one of them was half the problem out there.
Took Scotty 'Jughead' Norton and co a fair amount of time to turn the club around and get back on track.
by Ye Olde Place Kick » Tue Sep 03, 2019 12:29 am
by Cougar » Tue Sep 03, 2019 8:56 am
Ye Olde Place Kick wrote:Previous finals games Kers v Gum
72 Preliminary - Kers 14-9, Gum 9-8.
99 1st Semi - Kers 16-12, Gum 7-10
2010 1st Semi Kers 16-15, Gum 5-9
by FlyingHigh » Tue Sep 03, 2019 10:19 am
by Barkeroo » Sun Sep 08, 2019 12:44 am
by doubletrouble » Sun Sep 08, 2019 10:59 am
by B&F » Mon Sep 09, 2019 2:03 pm
by TooNice » Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:32 pm
by cracka » Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:46 pm
by Banker » Tue Sep 10, 2019 8:39 am
TooNice wrote:Given less juniors, perhaps drop number of players on field to 14 plus bench. No forward or back pockets. Certainly something to consider in Div 2.
If more players are available on a match day - coaches could increase up to 18. Certainly need to do something as 4 team comps not good. Really messed up first week of Div 2 Finals Series.
by doubletrouble » Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:04 pm
B&F wrote:Congratulations to all clubs and grades that have made it through to the Grand Final this Saturday....
My thoughts....
A GRADE
Kersbrook Vs Gumeracha - Stop Gums Mids (Moon, Hanna's) and Kersbrook are still too classy - dont think they will let this one slip like the semi. However Kersbrook Old Bodies may have been wishing to get straight through and this may be Gums chance to use their run and expose the older bodies of Kersbrook. Big oval to do it on too. Kersbrook in a close one.
B Grade
Kersbrook Vs Bridgewater/Callington - Bridgwater's B's seem to have a fair chunk of quality A Graders running around (Due to be juniors) with this I would say they have the edge on a bigger ground to expose them with the class they showed in the Semi to get there. Bridgewater by 3 goals.
18's - Gumeracha too good all year By 5 Goals.
16's - Unsure as hard to pick from a 4 team comp Kangarilla by 2 goals.
14's - Again 4 team comp - bridgy won some Meadows won some... Meadows by 2 points.
And just on juinors surly the Hills will put it to a vote again and go back to the 3 level juniors 13s 15s and 17s.
by Barkeroo » Fri Sep 13, 2019 2:04 am
cracka wrote:I would say div 2 juniors need 3 year age gaps.
by Barkeroo » Fri Sep 13, 2019 2:08 am
doubletrouble wrote:Barkeroo wrote:Brookers through to the GF after a 3 goal win today!
Interesting to see if Gums can repeat their performance
I think gums probably would have preferred ironbank to get through. I can't see kersbrook slipping up a second time round.
by Dutchy » Fri Sep 13, 2019 10:08 am
Barkeroo wrote:cracka wrote:I would say div 2 juniors need 3 year age gaps.
This
by mighty hounds » Fri Sep 13, 2019 10:12 am
Dutchy wrote:Barkeroo wrote:cracka wrote:I would say div 2 juniors need 3 year age gaps.
This
Not sure insurance would cover this
by Dutchy » Fri Sep 13, 2019 2:35 pm
by Keefy » Fri Sep 13, 2019 2:36 pm
Same thing happens in HFL when you get s younger player to play up an age group. That can be done on match dayDutchy wrote:Yeah I know some do it, when we want an u13 to play u15s we need to get all sorts of forms completed to comply with insurance I believe.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |