fiftympenalty wrote:Don't really know how you can refer to that as 'a fact', and surely those overrated recruits weren't playing for a lot less than about 600 each per week and that is about 40k a year, still astronomical wouldn't you say?
Don't get me wrong 50m -I actually agree with you on most of your points.
Yes fact is the wrong word...but believe me action had to be taken if we wanted to stay in the hunt. In such a tight comp it doesn't take much to go from being around the mark to struggling to win games - Yank is a perfect example.
Your numbers would make $32K - I reckon $15K would be astronomical personally. I make a point of not knowing what individual players get paid, but I have a fair idea of what some clubs budgets have been in recent years. I think every recruit is overpaid - the $ paid to good-average footballers is ridiculous IMO. But what is the alternative? languish at the bottom getting thumped every week? That ain't much fun!
Your point about a consistent environment is a good one - as long as it is a good environment. Pilmore's dont grow on trees though so the hunt begins.