OH WISE ONE WHEN YOU USE THE QUOTE OPTION AND ALL THE LITTLE FACE HAVE BEEN USED? SO I WILL DO THINGS MY WAY OK BECAUSE UNLIKE YOURSELF I CAN NOT ERASE OTHER PEOPLES POSTS! NO SILES NO WINK NO RED FACES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! oh so you have a dictionary woppie!! fact! if you can read? i was repeating names the rooster wrote all by himself. personally! all clubs have good and bad points and for that matter committee people also. DID YOU EVER PLAY AT TWO WELLS?Dogwatcher wrote:You talk about name calling, then call me a 'peanut' and other sundry names. Pot, kettle, black.
Now Torp, when you posted your comment regarding whether Rooster has anything to "offer other than name calling", it was immediately after this post.The Rooster wrote:You'd be right Doggie, But what sort of bloke wouldn't want to play or would make himself un-available for GF, Che wasn't alone, doesn't matter really the dust has cleared and they are fine with their recruits i'm sure.
And i haven't read the Bunyip lately (I gave up after some of the harsh critism of Tommy Dawkins) but good luck and honestly best wishes to Greg Phillips, it is for all intents and purposes the biggest coup since well,,last year when wangas slotted a lazy eight.
But i hope that Greg brings all of his enthusiasm and energy with him as we might not all like the rams, we want a strong comp and if this helps them be more competitive all the better.
Had a dream about Erin Phillips once, but that's probably best posted on another website
You didn't mention any post on page 51 when you posted this:torp wrote:HEY ROOSTER got anything better than name calling. TW footy club a joke![]()
![]()
So the only evidence I could call upon was Rooster's most recent post.
So obviously you don't know where the quote button is to point out the 'name calling' on page 51, or/and Rooster is able to offer something other than 'name calling' as was proven in that post.
Or maybe you’re possibly being a tad recalcitrant?