by daysofourlives » Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:59 pm
by Clever Dick » Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:05 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Howard, is it true that clubs have been told they have 2 years to have the CFB logo on their guernsey's?
This is a joke as i think you would find most country clubs are lucky to replace their sets every 5 years or so. Its a huge cost to clubs, most clubs would have at least 4 teams at $2000-$2500 a set equals $8000-$10000. Its money that could certainly be spent elsewhere like on junior development, since there is little or no support from higher levels in this area.
What about the CFB fighting the AFL and SANFL for a bigger slice of the pie from draftees for their grass roots clubs. Now that would be useful to the country clubs since they put most of the time in on a young players development i.e a kid starts playing footy at lets say 8yrs of age with his local club and continues to say the age of 16 before going to a SANFL club for maybe 2 years before being drafted at 18. Why do the SANFL clubs get such a big cut?
There are also exceptions to this like corey enright for example who played 4 games of U17 football for the magpies before being drafted. I believe the AFL says you have to play for a SANFL club before you are eligible to be drafted, yet i dont believe that is the case in victoria.
So perhaps the CFB instead of dictating to clubs on minor issues that clubs have handled themselves for years they should pursue more meaningful things on behalf of the clubs in the whole state that would really make a big difference to a clubs bottom line.
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:28 pm
by Howard » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:34 am
Clever Dick wrote:Howard wrote:Clever Dick wrote:The gentleman I speak of has no reason to lie to me nor do I have any reason to lie about this on this forum so your assumption that there is "no basis" is a fair way off the mark.
I can assure you that if you were to contact many clubs in many leagues, you will find they are fearful of what may happen beyond 2010 given that clubs are under instruction from the CFB already and little or no consultation has taken place.
Surely clubs & individual leagues have a right to either accept or decline what is put to them, but in many instances, this is not how it stands.
The reason I've suggested there may be "no basis" to your post is simply due to the fact you're not prepared to go into specifics, just because you were told something and they "have no reason to lie" does not stand up, with respect to proving whether something did or did not happen.
Also, you suggest that "in many instances" clubs are not able to make the decisions - but once again, just because you say that does not necessarily make it so, unfortunately, my point all along is, posters on this thread have been telling a few "porkies" - so we need specifics to clarify the situation, not hearsay and/or ridiculous accusations.
So Howard, can you tell me, who are "WE" or is that a 'freudian slip" I wonder?
Mine are not "porkies" as you put it, but detailed accounts of phone calls made to/from various people and told to me by a person involved in the conversations and this person is a relation of mine BTW. There is no way I am going to bleat the names of persons, clubs or leagues to you but I assure you, according to my source it has happened, whether you believe it or not is your choice. If you are the person who made the comment then you would know, if you're not, then you'll never know!
I tell you what, you pm to me who you are and your phone number and I'll fill you in, can't get much fairer than that!
by Howard » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:45 am
daysofourlives wrote:Howard, is it true that clubs have been told they have 2 years to have the CFB logo on their guernsey's?
This is a joke as i think you would find most country clubs are lucky to replace their sets every 5 years or so. Its a huge cost to clubs, most clubs would have at least 4 teams at $2000-$2500 a set equals $8000-$10000. Its money that could certainly be spent elsewhere like on junior development, since there is little or no support from higher levels in this area.
What about the CFB fighting the AFL and SANFL for a bigger slice of the pie from draftees for their grass roots clubs. Now that would be useful to the country clubs since they put most of the time in on a young players development i.e a kid starts playing footy at lets say 8yrs of age with his local club and continues to say the age of 16 before going to a SANFL club for maybe 2 years before being drafted at 18. Why do the SANFL clubs get such a big cut?
There are also exceptions to this like corey enright for example who played 4 games of U17 football for the magpies before being drafted. I believe the AFL says you have to play for a SANFL club before you are eligible to be drafted, yet i dont believe that is the case in victoria.
So perhaps the CFB instead of dictating to clubs on minor issues that clubs have handled themselves for years they should pursue more meaningful things on behalf of the clubs in the whole state that would really make a big difference to a clubs bottom line.
by Clever Dick » Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:15 pm
by Clever Dick » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:30 pm
by Clever Dick » Fri Mar 12, 2010 12:28 pm
by jumbo » Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:11 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Just out of interest, why the hell do they want their logo on the guernseys anyway?
Is it ego? Crock of **** if you ask me
by aceman » Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:43 pm
Clever Dick wrote:It looks as though Howard has gone "underground"!
by aceman » Sun Mar 14, 2010 5:30 pm
Mythical Creature wrote:What I don't understand in regards to the jumper issue is, Why do we all need to have CFL Logo at all? I understand the reasoning behind putting your association logo on the jumper due to many similar guernseys in neighbouring leagues such as Bombers, Tigers, Roosters, Magpies, Demons etc. But to have a CFL logo as well is just a pointless exercise unless of course you design and sell jumpers. This is why so many clubs are asking questions.
Apparently the APFL have a delegates meeting sometime next week so it will be interesting to see what comes up in regards to the CFL. I know for a fact that the clubs voted NO to the IDM sports tape deal at the AGM yet our league accepted it as they considered it in the best interest for the clubs.I would love to be a fly on the wall at that meeting.
by Raking Left Foot » Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:31 pm
by Mythical Creature » Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:29 am
aceman wrote:Mythical Creature wrote:What I don't understand in regards to the jumper issue is, Why do we all need to have CFL Logo at all? I understand the reasoning behind putting your association logo on the jumper due to many similar guernseys in neighbouring leagues such as Bombers, Tigers, Roosters, Magpies, Demons etc. But to have a CFL logo as well is just a pointless exercise unless of course you design and sell jumpers. This is why so many clubs are asking questions.
Apparently the APFL have a delegates meeting sometime next week so it will be interesting to see what comes up in regards to the CFL. I know for a fact that the clubs voted NO to the IDM sports tape deal at the AGM yet our league accepted it as they considered it in the best interest for the clubs.I would love to be a fly on the wall at that meeting.
MC, let us know the outcome of the meeting. They may be setting a dangerous precedent going against the club vote from the AGM.
by Raking Left Foot » Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:14 pm
by Mythical Creature » Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:33 pm
Raking Left Foot wrote:I'll be there tonight
I now hear the amateurs have got there meeting tonite as well and their league are using home finals as a weapon to make them use the sponsors
This is all carp - who's running this show?
Somones sitting on top organising this and the clubs are gettin screwed
by aceman » Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:55 pm
Raking Left Foot wrote:I'll be there tonight
I now hear the amateurs have got there meeting tonite as well and their league are using home finals as a weapon to make them use the sponsors
This is all carp - who's running this show?
Somones sitting on top organising this and the clubs are gettin screwed
by aceman » Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:00 pm
Mythical Creature wrote:aceman wrote:Mythical Creature wrote:What I don't understand in regards to the jumper issue is, Why do we all need to have CFL Logo at all? I understand the reasoning behind putting your association logo on the jumper due to many similar guernseys in neighbouring leagues such as Bombers, Tigers, Roosters, Magpies, Demons etc. But to have a CFL logo as well is just a pointless exercise unless of course you design and sell jumpers. This is why so many clubs are asking questions.
Apparently the APFL have a delegates meeting sometime next week so it will be interesting to see what comes up in regards to the CFL. I know for a fact that the clubs voted NO to the IDM sports tape deal at the AGM yet our league accepted it as they considered it in the best interest for the clubs.I would love to be a fly on the wall at that meeting.
MC, let us know the outcome of the meeting. They may be setting a dangerous precedent going against the club vote from the AGM.
I have had it confirmed that the APFL and delegates are definately meeting tonight. I feel it would certainly be an interesting meeting to attend. I will make sure that I speak with one of our delegates later in the week to find out if anything changes.
by Howard » Tue Mar 16, 2010 5:39 pm
Clever Dick wrote:It looks as though Howard has gone "underground"!
by Clever Dick » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:47 pm
Howard wrote:Clever Dick wrote:It looks as though Howard has gone "underground"!
Hi there clever - not gone underground but have been away and not had access to or want to visit this forum while away.
Anyway, obviously have been thinking about our debate and on balance I'd prefer it it you PM me and give me your number and I'll call you. How does that sound?
by Clever Dick » Tue Mar 16, 2010 9:02 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |