SA Footy

daysofourlives wrote:https://www.facebook.com/jaydee.sierra.9/videos/194621612177039

Anyone care to refute this? Im sure the fact chackers have come up with something by now.
By the way its not a glitch if it glitchs in the same direction every single time

For starters, that was from the 2019 gubernatorial election for governor, not the 2020 election.
Secondly, there was a recount instituted by the Republican candidate and he had to concede in the end that the count was indeed correct and there was no fraud, accepting the final decision.

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact ... SKBN27P2TI

This point is also worth noting:

The CISA explained here that every state has “voting system safeguards” to ensure ballots are counted correctly. These include testing and certification of voting systems and required auditable logs. As votes cast in the 2020 election were cast on paper ballots or using machines that produce a paper audit trail, CISA adds, “in the event any issues emerge with the voting system software, audit logs or tabulation,” tabulation audits can also be conducted.

As such, the machine count is able to be verified by a manual paper count, making undetectable machine fraud impossible.
Cheers

Kahuna wrote:This is worth a look

https://thedonald.win/

No, it really really isn't

I was so confused in the press conference the other day.

At one point he was saying they weren't allowed anywhere near close enough to see the ballots only for the his next sentence to say that all the handwriting looked suspiciously similar.

Surely if you were as far away as claimed you would not have seen handwriting.

whufc wrote:I was so confused in the press conference the other day.

At one point he was saying they weren't allowed anywhere near close enough to see the ballots only for the his next sentence to say that all the handwriting looked suspiciously similar.

Surely if you were as far away as claimed you would not have seen handwriting.

They, and all Democrat scrutineers, were initially kept a 'safe COVID distance' of 6 feet away from the counters. Both Republican and Democrat scrutineers were treated exactly the same. You don't hear Democrats screaming 'fraud, fraud, fraud', do you? Only one party is acting decently in this election... and it sure isn't the Republicans.

Cheers

Q. wrote:

Kahuna wrote:This is worth a look

https://thedonald.win/

No, it really really isn't

Then, again, I guess it is worth a look just to see how demented and out of touch with reality some Trump supporters are; Gawd.

All this from a party that has been running 'illegal voter suppression' for years, attempted to severely limit the abilities of UPS to operate so as to deny people the opportunity to vote, limited the number of ballot boxes and locations in predominantly African-American areas so as to make it very difficult for people of colour to vote etc etc etc.

bulldogproud wrote:

Q. wrote:

Kahuna wrote:This is worth a look

https://thedonald.win/

No, it really really isn't

Then, again, I guess it is worth a look just to see how demented and out of touch with reality some Trump supporters are; Gawd.

That's what I thought too.

Kahuna wrote:

bulldogproud wrote:

Q. wrote:

Kahuna wrote:This is worth a look

https://thedonald.win/

No, it really really isn't

Then, again, I guess it is worth a look just to see how demented and out of touch with reality some Trump supporters are; Gawd.

That's what I thought too.

It's the Big Footy of US Politics

Q. wrote:

Kahuna wrote:

bulldogproud wrote:

Q. wrote:No, it really really isn't

Then, again, I guess it is worth a look just to see how demented and out of touch with reality some Trump supporters are; Gawd.

That's what I thought too.

It's the Big Footy of US Politics

I was thinking it had something for everyone. Confirmation for Trump supporters and LOLs for everyone else.

Biden got into 1.04 a couple of days ago, back out to 1.12 now.
Seems there are plenty starting to think The Don might have a case here.

(FWIW, I don't).

$1.12 ....just hoping he wakes up every day

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

My account hopes Harris gets up.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Yeah Harris has drifted too, back out to the high 400s.

Its been a push of Don from 25s into mid-9s.

Joe back $1.06.



Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

It’s over for you bidenbros

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-fil ... -filed.pdf

Q. wrote:

Kahuna wrote:This is worth a look

https://thedonald.win/

No, it really really isn't

You trusted a link posted in here?

Armchair expert wrote:It’s over for you bidenbros

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-fil ... -filed.pdf

If that's the best they can come up with, it will be laughed out of court.
Not a single shred of admissible legal evidence. All it really admits to is an admission that the Republicans did not do their due diligence in relation to their management of mail-in ballots. It shows the Democrats did nothing illegal, just that the Republicans were bone lazy.
I honestly thought he had better lawyers than that.
Cheers

Trader wrote:Biden got into 1.04 a couple of days ago, back out to 1.12 now.
Seems there are plenty starting to think The Don might have a case here.

(FWIW, I don't).

Didn't Trump's odds come into something like $1.20 on election day from $3 within about half an hour?

Just shows most punters are clueless, and the betting companies capitalize.

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:$1.12 ....just hoping he wakes up every day

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Someone put $1m on at $1.13 and that jammed the market back in.

You had a small bet then.....

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Armchair expert wrote:It’s over for you bidenbros

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-fil ... -filed.pdf

Even the law firm that filed the petition admitted it was a waste of time and simply attempted to undermine the law:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/09/busi ... suits.html