by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri May 16, 2014 10:59 am
by Jimmy_041 » Fri May 16, 2014 11:01 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I think the government if wishing to save some money instead of punishing under 30s who may lose their job through no fault of their own, should look at under 18s and Newstart allowance
by bennymacca » Fri May 16, 2014 11:08 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I think the government if wishing to save some money instead of punishing under 30s who may lose their job through no fault of their own, should look at under 18s and Newstart allowance
It would never be the fault if anyone under 30 - just ask them
by Q. » Fri May 16, 2014 11:19 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I think the government if wishing to save some money instead of punishing under 30s who may lose their job through no fault of their own, should look at under 18s and Newstart allowance
by dedja » Fri May 16, 2014 11:43 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri May 16, 2014 12:06 pm
dedja wrote:By all means tighten the rules so that only those requiring assistance get it, but not all social security recipients are dole bludgers or are cheating the system.
How can anyone under 30 who genuinely is out of work survive with no payments for 6 months?
What if they have a family and kids?
Unbelievable.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri May 16, 2014 12:07 pm
Q. wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I think the government if wishing to save some money instead of punishing under 30s who may lose their job through no fault of their own, should look at under 18s and Newstart allowance
Or they could cut the superannuation concessions for the wealthy.
by bennymacca » Fri May 16, 2014 12:18 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Fri May 16, 2014 12:29 pm
bennymacca wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I think the government if wishing to save some money instead of punishing under 30s who may lose their job through no fault of their own, should look at under 18s and Newstart allowance
It would never be the fault if anyone under 30 - just ask them
Glad you don't have to try and find a job in today's climate...
by bennymacca » Fri May 16, 2014 12:32 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri May 16, 2014 12:37 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri May 16, 2014 12:40 pm
by dedja » Fri May 16, 2014 12:49 pm
by bennymacca » Fri May 16, 2014 1:09 pm
dedja wrote:keep an eye of for the revamped white Australia policy ... stop, the boats ... oh, hang on
by Q. » Fri May 16, 2014 1:21 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:workchoices will be back before you all know it in full force
by heater31 » Fri May 16, 2014 1:25 pm
by stan » Fri May 16, 2014 1:55 pm
dedja wrote:By all means tighten the rules so that only those requiring assistance get it, but not all social security recipients are dole bludgers or are cheating the system.
How can anyone under 30 who genuinely is out of work survive with no payments for 6 months?
What if they have a family and kids?
Unbelievable.
by stan » Fri May 16, 2014 1:58 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I think the government if wishing to save some money instead of punishing under 30s who may lose their job through no fault of their own, should look at under 18s and Newstart allowance
It would never be the fault if anyone under 30 - just ask them
by gossipgirl » Fri May 16, 2014 2:04 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Fri May 16, 2014 3:09 pm
stan wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I think the government if wishing to save some money instead of punishing under 30s who may lose their job through no fault of their own, should look at under 18s and Newstart allowance
It would never be the fault if anyone under 30 - just ask them
Jimmy, sometimes with redundancies it may well not be their fault. The company may have a few in a similar skill set and therefore are cutting numbers for because they need to. To say that yes, you statement is correct in some cases.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |