The South Australian Political Landscape

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby am Bays » Tue Aug 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Booney wrote:
stan wrote:
Booney wrote:Looking at March next year for the nRAH to be in use, at absolute best.

March 2017, what someone has put an actual month down.

Well shit hey.


Nope, I said at best.

Technical completion in mid September ( all going well ) and then minimum 3 months of system testing from there. ( Mid Dec at best ). All going ok with that testing and around New Year there should be signs of life, however, many of the systems to be tested are not yet finalized and as such the practical completion date and testing commencement date are not likely to be the same thing.


The key test will be the quality of the coffee staff can get for meetings there. As a someone who may frequent it for such occurrences it I can vouch that it will be a key criteria before it can be opened.....

:D 8)
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18568
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 164 times
Been liked: 1812 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby heater31 » Tue Aug 30, 2016 6:23 pm

am Bays wrote:
Booney wrote:
stan wrote:
Booney wrote:Looking at March next year for the nRAH to be in use, at absolute best.

March 2017, what someone has put an actual month down.

Well shit hey.


Nope, I said at best.

Technical completion in mid September ( all going well ) and then minimum 3 months of system testing from there. ( Mid Dec at best ). All going ok with that testing and around New Year there should be signs of life, however, many of the systems to be tested are not yet finalized and as such the practical completion date and testing commencement date are not likely to be the same thing.


The key test will be the quality of the coffee staff can get for meetings there. As a someone who may frequent it for such occurrences it I can vouch that it will be a key criteria before it can be opened.....

:D 8)

Blend 43 it is then ;)
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16538
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 525 times
Been liked: 1263 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Fri Sep 02, 2016 5:40 pm

My son just bought his first house for a tick over $400k
No first home owners grant
Over $20,000 in State Govt charges

Cheers Kouta :butthead:
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14001
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 720 times
Been liked: 1072 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Dog_ger2 » Wed Sep 14, 2016 6:05 am

Jimmy_041 wrote:My son just bought his first house for a tick over $400k
No first home owners grant
Over $20,000 in State Govt charges

Cheers Kouta :butthead:


Lets hope there are solar panels on the roof.
Dog_ger2
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 292
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2015 8:39 pm
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 17 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury North

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Wed Sep 14, 2016 11:51 am

Speaking of which, imagine if they had put the $160m from a tunnel that no-one wants into another inter-connector
It was an election promise only a mere 14 years ago
Plus we would save $500k on a study that has already been done in 2011
Notably, when the SA budget came out, the 2011 study was immediately taken off ElectraNet's website once The Australian asked the Govt why they were doing the study again
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14001
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 720 times
Been liked: 1072 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby stan » Wed Sep 14, 2016 7:37 pm

Jimmy_041 wrote:Speaking of which, imagine if they had put the $160m from a tunnel that no-one wants into another inter-connector
It was an election promise only a mere 14 years ago
Plus we would save $500k on a study that has already been done in 2011
Notably, when the SA budget came out, the 2011 study was immediately taken off ElectraNet's website once The Australian asked the Govt why they were doing the study again

Maybe I want it. You didnt ask me.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1254 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Wed Sep 14, 2016 9:49 pm

It means 7 minutes less time on here per day
You don't want it.....
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14001
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 720 times
Been liked: 1072 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby stan » Wed Sep 14, 2016 10:21 pm

Jimmy_041 wrote:It means 7 minutes less time on here per day
You don't want it.....

Maybe I just wanted someone to ask me if I wanted it.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1254 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Gozu » Tue Sep 20, 2016 10:42 pm

Latest Galaxy poll 53-47 to the Libs.

The Advertiser today carries a poll of South Australian state voting intention from Galaxy, which records the Liberals with a two-party preferred lead of 53-47, essentially unchanged on the result that failed to deliver them victory at the election in March 2014. However, the two-party vote is becoming difficult to parse in what now looks like a three-party system, with primary votes showing the Liberals on 35%, Labor on 27% and the Nick Xenophon Team on 22%, with the Greens on 7% and Family First on 5%. Personal ratings indicate Premier Jay Weatherill’s gloss has entirely worn off, with 14% rating his performance good, 41% fair and 37% poor, but Opposition Leader Steven Marshall does little better, respectively at 11%, 40% and 36%. The two leaders are tied at 31% on the question of preferred premier, compared with Weatherill’s lead of 37% to 27% at the last such poll in February. The poll was conducted last Monday to Wednesday from a sample of 869.


https://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger ... australia/

Dr. Bonham in the comments though:

2PP seems very dubious given what we know about NXT preferences now. By applying 2016 federal election preferences I get 50-50.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13489
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 660 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Wed Sep 21, 2016 12:20 am

In accordance with the South Australian constitution, which is the ultimate law, the party with the most votes should govern
Simple as that.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14001
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 720 times
Been liked: 1072 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby stan » Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:15 am

Jimmy_041 wrote:In accordance with the South Australian constitution, which is the ultimate law, the party with the most votes should govern
Simple as that.

Yeah sure. So which seats will you turn over to the Libs to give them enough seats to form government?
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1254 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Wed Sep 21, 2016 12:03 pm

stan wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:In accordance with the South Australian constitution, which is the ultimate law, the party with the most votes should govern
Simple as that.

Yeah sure. So which seats will you turn over to the Libs to give them enough seats to form government?


Not my job. The Electoral Commission has to comply with s83 of the Constitution.
If they cant, then they need to advise the Supreme Court that they can't.
The Constitution over-rides everything. Simple as that.
The Supreme Court may have to consider the Hare-Clark system so that we do comply with s83 or get rid of it altogether
Attachments
s83.png
s83.png (85.42 KiB) Viewed 300 times
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14001
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 720 times
Been liked: 1072 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby stan » Thu Sep 29, 2016 9:57 am

Should be a good day today in parliment.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1254 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:01 am

Did the $2,000,000,000 Desal plant shut down or have they got back up generators to ensure it can remain on go slow?

I costs us $80m in interest per year
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14001
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 720 times
Been liked: 1072 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Booney » Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:59 am

Jimmy_041 wrote:Did the $2,000,000,000 Desal plant shut down or have they got back up generators to ensure it can remain on go slow?

I costs us $80m in interest per year


Back up generators there, it can run without any external power for up to 10 days, I believe.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58372
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7494 times
Been liked: 10781 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Booney » Mon Oct 10, 2016 8:04 am

And the nRAH news keeps getting better.

You can mark down October 2017 for patients moving in. Looks as though technical completion will be some time in the New Year, then you have the mandatory 3 month testing period and only after that has been satisfied ( which may be more than 3 months ) can patients move in.

This will most likely be completed in June/July and peak 'flu season 'aint the time to be moving into a new hospital.

It will also give them another winter to find all the leaks in the building and plug them up.

It will also give them another 12 months to work out what they do with all the rooms adjacent the lift risers that have some much noise being regenerated into the rooms that they've had to acoustically line the ceilings of some rooms.

And....

And.......

And...........
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58372
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7494 times
Been liked: 10781 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby heater31 » Mon Oct 10, 2016 8:39 am

******* useless :roll:
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16538
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 525 times
Been liked: 1263 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Jimmy_041 » Mon Oct 10, 2016 12:46 pm

I think you'll find the government are quite happy for it to just sit there.
Saving $1m per day and he can boast about the non-existent surplus
It gives them time to try to fix EPAS as well
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14001
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 720 times
Been liked: 1072 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby shoe boy » Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:42 am

Surley the libs can find better than Marshall! Chapman? maybe not
User avatar
shoe boy
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4532
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:58 pm
Has liked: 488 times
Been liked: 209 times

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Postby Psyber » Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:36 am

Booney wrote:And the nRAH news keeps getting better.

You can mark down October 2017 for patients moving in. Looks as though technical completion will be some time in the New Year, then you have the mandatory 3 month testing period and only after that has been satisfied ( which may be more than 3 months ) can patients move in.

This will most likely be completed in June/July and peak 'flu season 'aint the time to be moving into a new hospital.

It will also give them another winter to find all the leaks in the building and plug them up.

It will also give them another 12 months to work out what they do with all the rooms adjacent the lift risers that have some much noise being regenerated into the rooms that they've had to acoustically line the ceilings of some rooms.

And....

And.......

And...........


I'm still wondering at putting the place in one of the most difficult traffic areas of Adelaide for ambulances to rush through to get patients to the ED.
I assume they government thought they' and their visitors (if they get there in time to survive) would all come by the electrified trains - provided the electricity was working...
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12216
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 390 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

PreviousNext

Board index   General Talk  Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |