by Gozu » Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:48 pm
by Q. » Thu Apr 12, 2012 2:15 pm
by Gozu » Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:29 pm
by Gozu » Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:36 am
by Leaping Lindner » Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:52 am
Gozu wrote:RACIST comments published on US book retailer website Amazon about an Aboriginal author have reignited debate surrounding News Ltd columnist Andrew Bolt's writings on indigenous people and drawn fire from Aboriginal groups.
Bolt, who was found guilty last year of offences under the Racial Discrimination Act, wrote a blog this week titled ''Are we censored enough for you?'' in response to Anita Heiss' book, Am I Black Enough for You?
Heiss was one of nine Aboriginal people who took Bolt and his publisher to court over articles that implied light-skinned indigenous people chose to be black for personal gain.
In a post on the Herald Sun website on Tuesday, Bolt included a link to US-based Amazon.com on which almost 80 ''reviews'' of Heiss' book had been published by last night, some openly racist. Some attacked Heiss personally and referred to a perceived lack of freedom of speech in Australia that prevented the writers from expressing their views here.
http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/boo ... 1wsa1.html
What slime Andrew Bolt is.
by dedja » Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:47 am
by story of my life » Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:48 am
Gozu wrote:"Andrew Bolt does not support “Amazon bombing” critics’ books, and he wishes his readers would stop following the link he gave them"
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2 ... gave-them/
by dedja » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:48 am
by Q. » Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:05 pm
by Gozu » Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:07 pm
by Psyber » Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:16 pm
Gozu wrote:Bolt trying to distance himself from the far-right 'Galileo Movement':
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andr ... ddle_this/
by scoob » Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:52 pm
Psyber wrote:Gozu wrote:Bolt trying to distance himself from the far-right 'Galileo Movement':
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andr ... ddle_this/
TRYING.. ?
Looked like a pretty clear statement of rejection to me.
However, I don't read his stuff so I don't know whether he has published anything that suggested he supported this group in the past that would justify calling it "distancing" now.
by Gozu » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:59 pm
by scoob » Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:26 pm
Gozu wrote:Psyber, supposedly Bolt's name has been used in support of the 'Galileo Movement' before.
Scoob, I haven't read anything from Bolt at all this year (until this blog post) and only because someone else posted it on another forum. I only bothered to have a look because I've heard some of their conspiracy theories before which are unintentionally hilarious.
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:21 pm
by Gozu » Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:56 pm
scoob wrote:Sorry there must be multiple Gozu's posting on here
by Gozu » Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:57 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Different voices in the brain
by scoob » Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:22 pm
Gozu wrote:scoob wrote:Sorry there must be multiple Gozu's posting on here
Nah just the one.
You made the mistake of assuming I read Bolt's blog or newspaper articles just because I used to put up posts from Pure Poison.
by Gozu » Wed Aug 08, 2012 6:19 pm
by scoob » Wed Aug 08, 2012 6:29 pm
Gozu wrote:Can you actually read?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |