by Sploosh » Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:39 pm
by heater31 » Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:11 pm
by Interceptor » Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:42 pm
by BenchedEagle » Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:50 pm
Sploosh wrote:Anyone else watching this right now? I reckon that worm is a bit sus. Every time Rudd answers, the worm shoots up straight away and stays in the positive. When Howard answers, it is usually flat, and gradually drifts lower. If the purpose of the worm is to accurately reflect what the pollies are saying and how it is being received, surely they needed people more willing to listen and be open minded.
Ah, who really cares about the worm...
by GWW » Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:51 pm
Interceptor wrote:Well, pretty interesting info from the ABC's wrap up:
Channel 9 defied the rule against the Worm and the National Press Club demanded that their feed be cut off!
It was, but 9 managed to get a "pirate" signal!
Would have been funny to see 9 without a show to put on air...
by heater31 » Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:52 pm
Interceptor wrote:Well, pretty interesting info from the ABC's wrap up:
Channel 9 defied the rule against the Worm and the National Press Club demanded that their feed be cut off!
It was, but 9 managed to get a "pirate" signal!
Would have been funny to see 9 without a show to put on air...
by Sploosh » Sun Oct 21, 2007 10:07 pm
by TroyGFC » Sun Oct 21, 2007 10:11 pm
by Brad » Sun Oct 21, 2007 10:15 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Oct 22, 2007 4:25 am
lizbeff eaglez wrote:Sploosh wrote:Anyone else watching this right now? I reckon that worm is a bit sus. Every time Rudd answers, the worm shoots up straight away and stays in the positive. When Howard answers, it is usually flat, and gradually drifts lower. If the purpose of the worm is to accurately reflect what the pollies are saying and how it is being received, surely they needed people more willing to listen and be open minded.
Ah, who really cares about the worm...
Maybe it is that the worm really was accurate???? Howard has nothin worth listening to?
Rudd won easily tonight. Watch for Haward to squirm out out of any more debates in ths campaign
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Oct 22, 2007 4:29 am
TroyGFC wrote:Can anyone explain to me what the worm is. And how it is determined.
by mick » Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:23 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:TroyGFC wrote:Can anyone explain to me what the worm is. And how it is determined.
i do agree that when both spoke it either jumped straight up or straight down in howards case even if they had said 3 words.........
by zipzap » Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:35 am
mick wrote: unless one or other speaker makes a huge stuff up. Neither of them did.
by mick » Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:58 am
zipzap wrote:mick wrote: unless one or other speaker makes a huge stuff up. Neither of them did.
Hmmm. According to one gaff from doddery old Mr Howard, 15% of the Australian workforce are former trade union officials! Mr Speaker! Mr Speaker!
by Leaping Lindner » Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:05 am
by noone » Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:24 pm
by Snaggletooth Tiger » Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:57 pm
by Aerie » Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:11 pm
mick wrote:...whether these debates actually have any significant impact on voters is debatable...
by Hondo » Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:04 pm
by Psyber » Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:28 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |