shoe boy wrote:People in Glass houses???????????????
Bit rich coming from your neck of the woods

by Jimmy_041 » Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:31 am
shoe boy wrote:People in Glass houses???????????????
by aceman » Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:56 am
Psyber wrote:Money is a great motivator - large amounts more so.AFLflyer wrote:It would appear that the alleged sexual relationship took place with Rann and Chantelois, but you would have to question the integrity of Chantelois, why would you bare all like that and tell the world!
If money is the motive, she is crazy, let sleeping dogs lie! IMO What she was syaing makes not only Rann look bad but more so herself!
And of course if you were working as a waitress and you no longer have your job or your marriage, even through your own silly choices, it gets even more powerful.
by lesthemechanic » Mon Nov 23, 2009 1:27 pm
by Choccies » Mon Nov 23, 2009 2:16 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Well, he does admire Bill Clinton but a cigar does show a bit more imagination than just bending her over the desk.
Mrs Jimmy - didn't think the little twerp had it in him![]()
![]()
Kevin Rudd - Mike Rann sticks up for his state more than any other premier - gotta admit, he does go beyond the call for duty - appropriate coin of phrase there Kev
by silicone skyline » Mon Nov 23, 2009 2:32 pm
by mick » Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:17 pm
lesthemechanic wrote:Seems funny that the Libs are not all over this , calling for Ranns head. Must be more than a few skeletons in their closet that the Labor party know about. Or am I reading too much into the deafening silence ?
by interested observer » Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:20 pm
mick wrote:lesthemechanic wrote:Seems funny that the Libs are not all over this , calling for Ranns head. Must be more than a few skeletons in their closet that the Labor party know about. Or am I reading too much into the deafening silence ?
This has it's own momentum, they don't need to say anything. Sure there would be heaps of skeletons in the cupboard on both sides, there may be some sort of "gentleman's agreement" on these matters
by Gingernuts » Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:22 pm
by wycbloods » Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:44 pm
interested observer wrote:mick wrote:lesthemechanic wrote:Seems funny that the Libs are not all over this , calling for Ranns head. Must be more than a few skeletons in their closet that the Labor party know about. Or am I reading too much into the deafening silence ?
This has it's own momentum, they don't need to say anything. Sure there would be heaps of skeletons in the cupboard on both sides, there may be some sort of "gentleman's agreement" on these matters
Has denied it in press conference...
This is getting better by the minute....
by A Mum » Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:47 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:52 pm
by blueandwhite » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:01 pm
by JK » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:04 pm
by lesthemechanic » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:07 pm
blueandwhite wrote:Now that he's denied it: if he is lying he has just committed political suicide.
by silicone skyline » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:09 pm
by interested observer » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:12 pm
lesthemechanic wrote:blueandwhite wrote:Now that he's denied it: if he is lying he has just committed political suicide.
Nor really, unless she has some evidence , which is probably why he has been told to deny it. They probably waited to see how the public reacted to the woman, then once they found quite a bit of the public are not sympathising with her, deny, deny, deny!!! Smart really
by lesthemechanic » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:12 pm
silicone skyline wrote:Rann's blaming Channel 7, not her for saying it. I find that interesting.
by lesthemechanic » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:14 pm
interested observer wrote:lesthemechanic wrote:blueandwhite wrote:Now that he's denied it: if he is lying he has just committed political suicide.
Nor really, unless she has some evidence , which is probably why he has been told to deny it. They probably waited to see how the public reacted to the woman, then once they found quite a bit of the public are not sympathising with her, deny, deny, deny!!! Smart really
Would not think she or her advisors would have gone down this path without something pretty damn solid..
That coupled up with the way 7 are drip feeding the whole thing might just suggest the big bang (no pun intented) is yet to come ??
by silicone skyline » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:14 pm
by interested observer » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:16 pm
silicone skyline wrote:Seven provided the medium, but if she's the one doing the lying, surely you'd be angry at her too??
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |