Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:28 pmApachebulldog wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Biden says only he can stop the rioting and violence. For once he's correct.
Him smart man Hidin Biden LOL.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:41 pmwoodublieve12 wrote:Apachebulldog wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Biden says only he can stop the rioting and violence. For once he's correct.
Him smart man Hidin Biden LOL.
he is certainly smarter than bunker bitch Trump....
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 10:49 pmPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 12:42 pmPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:02 pmwoodublieve12 wrote:Trumps been recorded admitted he talked down corona virus... 190k dead... He makes George Bush look like a genius
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 2:11 pmJimmy_041 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Trumps been recorded admitted he talked down corona virus... 190k dead... He makes George Bush look like a genius
A lot of political leaders have to avoid panic
Remember Scomo saying he was still going to the footy this weekend?
Just more Trump hate mail. Nothing to see here
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2020 9:22 amPosted: Mon Sep 21, 2020 12:45 pmPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:30 amPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2020 6:50 pmPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2020 8:13 pmApachebulldog wrote:Ah yes the good old Democrats and their loony radicals have responded.
Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2020 8:46 pmPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:03 pmPosted: Wed Sep 23, 2020 10:26 amApachebulldog wrote:Ah yes the good old Democrats and their loony radicals have responded.
Ahhh American politics full of LOONIES and fascinating to watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQGDwGQ8GUg
Personally if i were Trump i would nominate her replacement after he wins the presidency.
However does it really matter either way the Democrats will still be irate because it will be a conservative judge that will be appointed.
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2020 1:44 pmMagellan wrote:Apachebulldog wrote:Ah yes the good old Democrats and their loony radicals have responded.
Ahhh American politics full of LOONIES and fascinating to watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQGDwGQ8GUg
Personally if i were Trump i would nominate her replacement after he wins the presidency.
However does it really matter either way the Democrats will still be irate because it will be a conservative judge that will be appointed.
Okay, Apache - two things.
First and foremost, feel free to use throwaway terms in the abstract, but do not make this personal by calling me (or others) 'looney radicals.' There's nothing 'looney' in expecting people in high public office (like the Republican majority senate) to adhere to principles that they themselves have created and put into practice.
Second, since you're not a liberal bleeding heart snowflake, you obviously won't mind if I also call you a 'looney', which by your own standard you must be if you agree that Trump should nominate Ginsburg's replacement after the election result.
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2020 2:04 pmApachebulldog wrote:Its all on the YOU TUBE mate look at other alternate News Sources and you will learn and you will see the other side of the story then you can make up your mind.
But alas most people are not interested they just go along with the usual tripe that is put out there.
I gave up watching the lies on 2 7 9 10 have been dishing out for years.
Its all at ya finger tips so have a look if ya got the time.
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2020 2:20 pmApachebulldog wrote:Magellan wrote:Apachebulldog wrote:Ah yes the good old Democrats and their loony radicals have responded.
Ahhh American politics full of LOONIES and fascinating to watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQGDwGQ8GUg
Personally if i were Trump i would nominate her replacement after he wins the presidency.
However does it really matter either way the Democrats will still be irate because it will be a conservative judge that will be appointed.
Okay, Apache - two things.
First and foremost, feel free to use throwaway terms in the abstract, but do not make this personal by calling me (or others) 'looney radicals.' There's nothing 'looney' in expecting people in high public office (like the Republican majority senate) to adhere to principles that they themselves have created and put into practice.
Second, since you're not a liberal bleeding heart snowflake, you obviously won't mind if I also call you a 'looney', which by your own standard you must be if you agree that Trump should nominate Ginsburg's replacement after the election result.
No where in my post have I called you a loony mate do not twist my words around.
For your info I am referring to the American Democrats and some of their loony radicals like Crazy Cortez and her squad.
So are you an American Democrat Senator/member/voter or are you just thin skinned ????????
That's up to the serving American president to nominate a judge to SCOTUS as has been the practice for the last 29 instances over the years.
Refer below
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3erPoCFoGc
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2020 4:30 pmApachebulldog wrote:Its all on the YOU TUBE mate look at other alternate News Sources
I gave up watching the lies on 2 7 9 10 have been dishing out for years.
Its all at ya finger tips so have a look if ya got the time.
Apachebulldog wrote:Here is one snippet i found so easy to find info re New York.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFVJ2nJJXlk
Also lets mention California the common denominator yep Democrat run.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMKru8S1Gd4
Apachebulldog wrote:That's up to the serving American president to nominate a judge to SCOTUS as has been the practice for the last 29 instances over the years.
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:08 pmMagellan wrote:Apachebulldog wrote:Magellan wrote:Apachebulldog wrote:Ah yes the good old Democrats and their loony radicals have responded.
Ahhh American politics full of LOONIES and fascinating to watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQGDwGQ8GUg
Personally if i were Trump i would nominate her replacement after he wins the presidency.
However does it really matter either way the Democrats will still be irate because it will be a conservative judge that will be appointed.
Okay, Apache - two things.
First and foremost, feel free to use throwaway terms in the abstract, but do not make this personal by calling me (or others) 'looney radicals.' There's nothing 'looney' in expecting people in high public office (like the Republican majority senate) to adhere to principles that they themselves have created and put into practice.
Second, since you're not a liberal bleeding heart snowflake, you obviously won't mind if I also call you a 'looney', which by your own standard you must be if you agree that Trump should nominate Ginsburg's replacement after the election result.
No where in my post have I called you a loony mate do not twist my words around.
For your info I am referring to the American Democrats and some of their loony radicals like Crazy Cortez and her squad.
So are you an American Democrat Senator/member/voter or are you just thin skinned ????????
That's up to the serving American president to nominate a judge to SCOTUS as has been the practice for the last 29 instances over the years.
Refer below
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3erPoCFoGc
Fair enough, I over-reacted. I presumed your reference to 'loonies' extended to included mine and RB's previous posts, given they addressed the same topic that you responded to. Apologies.
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:21 pmRB wrote:Apachebulldog wrote:Its all on the YOU TUBE mate look at other alternate News Sources
I gave up watching the lies on 2 7 9 10 have been dishing out for years.
Its all at ya finger tips so have a look if ya got the time.
I asked you to name some of the Democrats' radical policies - not a hard ask I wouldn't have thought given you've got plenty to say on the matter.
And all you can do is to refer me to Youtube?
Also, it's interesting how you disregard 2 7 9 10, and instead take your news from a Youtuber called 'Electric Infected'.
Now by all means I agree with your general comments about keeping an open mind and actively seeking out the truth. I just find it unusual that 'Electric Infected' and other Youtubers (which tend coincidentally to suit your narrative) are taken as gospel, while the major TV networks and national newspapers and news sites are all Marxist propaganda.Apachebulldog wrote:Here is one snippet i found so easy to find info re New York.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFVJ2nJJXlk
Also lets mention California the common denominator yep Democrat run.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMKru8S1Gd4
I watched your videos.
One taught me that there's a lot of crime in New York. Hardly a news flash. Not sure what it's meant to prove anyway - there's a hell of a lot of crime in Republican cities as well.
The video about California was mostly about how the housing market is making it very difficult for most people to buy even modest houses.
Definitely an important issue, but all it did was demonstrate that the free market economy is alive and well in California, a mainly Democrat-controlled state. Again, I'm not sure what is meant to be loony or radical about allowing the market to decide the price of real estate. In fact quite the opposite I would have thought.Apachebulldog wrote:That's up to the serving American president to nominate a judge to SCOTUS as has been the practice for the last 29 instances over the years.
Well it was - until four years ago when the Republican-controlled Senate trashed the practice (months and months before the election). I guess I'm not surprised that you're trying to justify the hypocrisy. It does require some mental somersaults though.