by Sojourner » Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:42 am
by fish » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:24 pm
Yeah this bloke needs to keep his head down - the last thing Labor needs is a by-election!scoob wrote:No comments on the topic Psybes - don't think there will be many on this story either
http://www.news.com.au/national/labors- ... 6116381753
by Gozu » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:41 pm
fish wrote:Yeah this bloke needs to keep his head down - the last thing Labor needs is a by-election!scoob wrote:No comments on the topic Psybes - don't think there will be many on this story either
http://www.news.com.au/national/labors- ... 6116381753
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:48 pm
by scoob » Fri Aug 19, 2011 10:06 am
Gozu wrote:fish wrote:Yeah this bloke needs to keep his head down - the last thing Labor needs is a by-election!scoob wrote:No comments on the topic Psybes - don't think there will be many on this story either
http://www.news.com.au/national/labors- ... 6116381753
If he had have used taxpayers money to buy the hookers, sure. As I understand it wasn't so therefore a massive beat up by the Libs and their media shills.
by The Sleeping Giant » Fri Aug 19, 2011 10:13 am
by Bat Pad » Fri Aug 19, 2011 10:23 am
Gozu wrote:fish wrote:Yeah this bloke needs to keep his head down - the last thing Labor needs is a by-election!scoob wrote:No comments on the topic Psybes - don't think there will be many on this story either
http://www.news.com.au/national/labors- ... 6116381753
If he had have used taxpayers money to buy the hookers, sure. As I understand it wasn't so therefore a massive beat up by the Libs and their media shills.
by redandblack » Fri Aug 19, 2011 10:33 am
by scoob » Fri Aug 19, 2011 10:38 am
redandblack wrote:The union hasn't lost any money. They owed him $190,000 in entitlements and it was all settled.
For him to lose his seat, he would have to be charged, found guilty and sentenced to at least 12 months prison.
It isn't going to happen.
I think it should, but since John Howard stopped sacking his Ministers for similar acts (remember Peter Reith's $50,000 phone bill he had to pay back when his son handed out his governemnt phone?), that standard of responsibility was trashed.
The only MP facing charges at the moment is a Liberal Senator for shoplifting and assault.
by redandblack » Fri Aug 19, 2011 11:10 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Fri Aug 19, 2011 12:47 pm
by am Bays » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:10 pm
by scoob » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:16 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:24 pm
by redandblack » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:25 pm
by Sojourner » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:28 pm
scoob wrote:So the Labor government approves of him using union credit card to pay prostitutes - here is a question - would the Labor party take action and force him to resign if they had clear majority and were in no danger to lose government?
by The Sleeping Giant » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:29 pm
by scoob » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:32 pm
redandblack wrote:Probably, but for all the holier than thou pronouncements, under the same circumstances Tony Abbott might lose several (shall we say, colourful) members also.
As I also said, were any of you outraged when the Liberal Senator was charged with shoplifting and assault. I wasn't, I posted that I wasn't and my position is the same here.
by scoob » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:35 pm
Sojourner wrote:scoob wrote:So the Labor government approves of him using union credit card to pay prostitutes - here is a question - would the Labor party take action and force him to resign if they had clear majority and were in no danger to lose government?
Were the hookers from South Australia? If so then yes it would be illegal, yet if it happened in NSW then I am fairly certain its all been legalised, so there is no real legal issue for them to approve of or not?
by redandblack » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:59 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |