by redandblack » Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:14 pm
by Psyber » Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:22 pm
"Class" is problematical, I guess, as it means different things to different people, and has picked up valuational connotations that were not originally there, like the one I threw in about Packer.redandblack wrote:I agree with you about Packer and (lack of) class.
Apart from that, I don't spend much time thinking about social classes.
by Dog_ger » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:13 pm
by southee » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:15 pm
Dog_ger wrote:I think "Randy" is taking us all for granted.
As every day passes I am leaning towards "Liberal"
1. The Murray.
2. The De-Salination plant.
3. Adelaide Oval
4. Our Hospitals.
5. CAN LIBERAL DO ANY WORSE...?
6. PFFFT.... Add .8% to your workload. Impossible Randy.
I work in aged care. Come and do my job for 48 hours my premier....
You will not have any time to do things on my office desk except work....![]()
This is a time to say "Wake up GUYS"
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:41 am
by redandblack » Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:49 am
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:15 am
by redandblack » Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:24 am
by dedja » Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:38 am
by Gingernuts » Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:48 am
dedja wrote:Labor will win comfortably ... even though they have issues everywhere but the opposition are a complete shambles.
Whether it's right or wrong, people will stick with what they know best.
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:31 pm
redandblack wrote:I'm not quite sure where to start, mate.
I don't want to write a book, but bookmakers take all factors possible into account when framing a market. The odds thay are quoting here are for a two horse race where one is an overwhelming favourite.
I suppose the main factor that might surprise you is that gambling isn't the preserve of any particular 'social class', but is spread over the population. Although the odds reflect the market, they are also very much in line with the opinion polls.
(I did hear a rumour that the pollsters are only polling certain stratas of society, though ;)
by Psyber » Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:07 pm
I'd assumed so and treated it appropriately..redandblack wrote:You got it in one.
by fish » Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:38 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:I went to a function last night. Mainly tradeys like electricians, plumbers etc
I didn't say a thing to anyone about politics - just listened to people talking - the winds of change are in the air for this State Government............
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:38 pm
by dedja » Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:51 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:59 pm
by Gozu » Fri Jan 22, 2010 12:21 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:Tell me what's worse - an MD of one of SA's best companies saying something about the current government and because he is a member of the opposition parry, his opinion is ridiculed, or the AMERICAN sportsman who is PAID BY US to be here giving his opinion that Ranny should be re-elected.
Jimmy_041 wrote:The media should be questioning Lance on the current issues to see what a complete f###wit he really is
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |