am Bays wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:GWW wrote:When will the Libs appoint as leader someone that the electorate would vote for?
Would need to be someone outside the current crop
Wingard
Would definitely get the Port Power voters on side.

by Magellan » Thu Apr 07, 2016 3:26 pm
am Bays wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:GWW wrote:When will the Libs appoint as leader someone that the electorate would vote for?
Would need to be someone outside the current crop
Wingard
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Apr 07, 2016 4:50 pm
by GWW » Thu Apr 07, 2016 6:18 pm
by stan » Thu Apr 07, 2016 10:48 pm
GWW wrote:I could quite easily foresee Wingard & Mulligan competing against each other as leaders of their respective parties for a decade or 2.
by Dogwatcher » Fri Apr 08, 2016 9:58 am
am Bays wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:GWW wrote:When will the Libs appoint as leader someone that the electorate would vote for?
Would need to be someone outside the current crop
Wingard
Young, not one of the old guard (yet)
And whilst I hate this, with his professional background (journalist) can get a message across.
by tipper » Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:47 am
Dogwatcher wrote:am Bays wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:GWW wrote:When will the Libs appoint as leader someone that the electorate would vote for?
Would need to be someone outside the current crop
Wingard
Young, not one of the old guard (yet)
And whilst I hate this, with his professional background (journalist) can get a message across.
Chatting to some in the Libs and they are not sold on this option - although I thought the same as you Am Bays.
There's a perception there's a bit of the Biggles about him. Good media performer, not quite up to scratch with policy.
I still think he goes all right.
I get the feeling the popular option is D VHP. But...I haven't really noticed any profile building from him as yet.
With the Libs, this branch of them anyway, it's all about who can do the best job of creating unity.
That's just my perception from the little contact I have with people.
by stan » Fri Apr 08, 2016 12:48 pm
by am Bays » Fri Apr 08, 2016 3:36 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:That's what the dumb voters want - a media performer
I'd rather a Robert Champion de Crespigny type
by Grenville » Fri Apr 08, 2016 6:03 pm
by Booney » Tue Apr 12, 2016 11:12 am
by Corona Man » Tue Apr 12, 2016 11:14 am
Grenville wrote:Peter Malinauskas was ordained as the golden child a long, long time ago. It would take something significant to happen for him not to be Jay's successor.
by stan » Tue Apr 12, 2016 11:15 pm
Booney wrote:The nRAH director has stepped down, the independent reviewer is soon to hand down the revised opening date and it's fairly certain that date will be into 2017, well into 2017.It was meant for completion now, in fact April 2016 was PC date, it looks like it could be at least 12 months delayed. It was revised to November but that seems unlikely.
Liquidated damages to the joint venture HY&L consortium are around $850,000 per day. Yes, per day.
So let's work that roughly 365 days late at $850,000 per day = $310,250,000. Let's call it $310m for round numbers.
The consortium will be looking for $20-25m back for the clean up of contaminated soil not known about at the start of the project so let's call it $25m back.$310-25 = $285m
You think we'll hear/see much about this $285m?
by stan » Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:24 am
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:33 am
stan wrote:The new RAH was always going to be done as cheap as possiblem. Hence the issue about the imported steel......
by stan » Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:50 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:stan wrote:The new RAH was always going to be done as cheap as possiblem. Hence the issue about the imported steel......
Other than a certain rat denying it for months
by heater31 » Wed Apr 13, 2016 10:31 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:stan wrote:The new RAH was always going to be done as cheap as possiblem. Hence the issue about the imported steel......
Other than a certain rat denying it for months
by bennymacca » Wed Apr 13, 2016 10:39 am
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Apr 13, 2016 11:30 am
by stan » Wed Apr 13, 2016 11:39 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:So much of that hospital (and Adelaide Oval) has been built using overseas and interstate material and labour and local companies couldn't even get a foot in the door to, at least, submit a tender.
Bit late to be promising to use local stuff when the horse has bolted
by Booney » Thu Apr 14, 2016 10:52 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:So much of that hospital (and Adelaide Oval) has been built using overseas and interstate material and labour and local companies couldn't even get a foot in the door to, at least, submit a tender.
Bit late to be promising to use local stuff when the horse has bolted
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |