Is it as traumatic as the ongoing threat to life implicit in the previous events?Quichey wrote:So you don't think imprisonment is traumatic? How about for children who are imprisoned?
The trauma that a criminal suffers from incarceration has been well documented, yet you doubt that an average family suffers stress from incarceration?
Also, there is a difference between trauma and the PTSD one can seek compensation for in Australia.
Surely these previous stresses are more likely causes of any PTSD that actually exists than being detained somewhere that is safe while being assessed.
I'm not saying none of them have PTSD but questioning whether the detention is the primary cause.
The DSM-IV definiton of PTSD that the law usually relies on requires there to have been actual injury or a threat to life : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PTSD#Criteria
Criteria
The diagnostic criteria for PTSD, stipulated in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (Text Revision) (DSM-IV-TR), may be summarized as:
A: Exposure to a traumatic event
This must have involved both (a) loss of "physical integrity", or risk of serious injury or death, to self or others, and (b) a response to the event that involved intense fear, horror or helplessness (or in children, the response must involve disorganized or agitated behavior). (The DSM-IV-TR criterion differs substantially from the previous DSM-III-R stressor criterion, which specified the traumatic event should be of a type that would cause "significant symptoms of distress in almost anyone," and that the event was "outside the range of usual human experience."[59])
One could argue that the only potential cause of PTSD in the detention camps is from those who riot, and that they should be removed immediately to a more secure place of detention, for the safety of others waiting to be processed. Failing to do that may be something our government could be sued for, perhaps.