liberal party keep hiring from dodgey capitalist pigs

[dedja]

not when he can't string 2 coherent words together ...

[bulldogproud2]

You can't vote for a Prime Minister or Premier so you're point is meaningless ... as are all your points.

but you are meant to know exactly what what ST is saying dont you?

I don't even know if ST has any idea or comprehension of what he is saying on any of his posts - sure thing the rest of us don't!

[best on hill]

not when he can't string 2 coherent words together ...

[dedja]

Find a reference to Prime Minister in the Constitution, or show me where you vote for Prime Minister or Premier on a electoral voting slip and I'll donate my life savings, wife and 3 daughters to Andrew Bolt ...

This is looking good as a quote for my next auto-signature Perhaps I'll take the liberty of prefacing it with ïf Glenelg can win one final this year.."

Go for it ... I'm a broken man already, nothing else can hurt me

[straight talker]

so the people of OZ wanted juliar to be the PM did they? How about SA did they vote weatherall to be premier did they??

Not once in Australian history have people ever elected a Prime Minister or a Premier, ST. All you get to vote for is your local candidate. It has always been the political party that has chosen the leader and that is unlikely to ever change.
As for the capitalism angle, under Howard Australia became a much less egalitarian society. The people who got ahead in this country were those who invested their money and got others to do all the work for them. The return provided to employees dropped markedly as a percentage of business revenue.

and that is correct. what i am saying is the people of oz voted for labor and kevin 07 correct? and the people of sa voted for randy rann correct? the union thug powerbrokers have gotten rid of both of them. australia has never been in so good of condition as when howard and costello were running us thats for sure and i think the overall stats would show that. bulldog i dont think you have enlightened us with anything worthwhile either thats for sure>..

[bulldogproud2]

so the people of OZ wanted juliar to be the PM did they? How about SA did they vote weatherall to be premier did they??

Not once in Australian history have people ever elected a Prime Minister or a Premier, ST. All you get to vote for is your local candidate. It has always been the political party that has chosen the leader and that is unlikely to ever change.
As for the capitalism angle, under Howard Australia became a much less egalitarian society. The people who got ahead in this country were those who invested their money and got others to do all the work for them. The return provided to employees dropped markedly as a percentage of business revenue.

and that is correct. what i am saying is the people of oz voted for labor and kevin 07 correct? and the people of sa voted for randy rann correct? the union thug powerbrokers have gotten rid of both of them. australia has never been in so good of condition as when howard and costello were running us thats for sure and i think the overall stats would show that. bulldog i dont think you have enlightened us with anything worthwhile either thats for sure>..

ST, perhaps take your mind back just a couple of years to where the leader of the national Liberal Party changed four times in the space of two years or so. It happens within all political parties and is their right.

[dedja]

so the people of OZ wanted juliar to be the PM did they? How about SA did they vote weatherall to be premier did they??

Not once in Australian history have people ever elected a Prime Minister or a Premier, ST. All you get to vote for is your local candidate. It has always been the political party that has chosen the leader and that is unlikely to ever change.
As for the capitalism angle, under Howard Australia became a much less egalitarian society. The people who got ahead in this country were those who invested their money and got others to do all the work for them. The return provided to employees dropped markedly as a percentage of business revenue.

and that is correct. what i am saying is the people of oz voted for labor and kevin 07 correct? and the people of sa voted for randy rann correct?

LOL, you agree and then contradict yourself literally in the same sentence ... faarking hilarious

Does your Mum and Dad know that you're up this late or are you just simply a moron?

[best on hill]

so the people of OZ wanted juliar to be the PM did they? How about SA did they vote weatherall to be premier did they??

Not once in Australian history have people ever elected a Prime Minister or a Premier, ST. All you get to vote for is your local candidate. It has always been the political party that has chosen the leader and that is unlikely to ever change.
As for the capitalism angle, under Howard Australia became a much less egalitarian society. The people who got ahead in this country were those who invested their money and got others to do all the work for them. The return provided to employees dropped markedly as a percentage of business revenue.

and that is correct. what i am saying is the people of oz voted for labor and kevin 07 correct? and the people of sa voted for randy rann correct? the union thug powerbrokers have gotten rid of both of them. australia has never been in so good of condition as when howard and costello were running us thats for sure and i think the overall stats would show that. bulldog i dont think you have enlightened us with anything worthwhile either thats for sure>..

the highlighted one here seems worthwhile although it did prove you wrong so that is why you would consider it not worthwhile

[bulldogproud2]

so the people of OZ wanted juliar to be the PM did they? How about SA did they vote weatherall to be premier did they??

Not once in Australian history have people ever elected a Prime Minister or a Premier, ST. All you get to vote for is your local candidate. It has always been the political party that has chosen the leader and that is unlikely to ever change.
As for the capitalism angle, under Howard Australia became a much less egalitarian society. The people who got ahead in this country were those who invested their money and got others to do all the work for them. The return provided to employees dropped markedly as a percentage of business revenue.

and that is correct. what i am saying is the people of oz voted for labor and kevin 07 correct? and the people of sa voted for randy rann correct? the union thug powerbrokers have gotten rid of both of them. australia has never been in so good of condition as when howard and costello were running us thats for sure and i think the overall stats would show that. bulldog i dont think you have enlightened us with anything worthwhile either thats for sure>..

ST, perhaps take your mind back just a couple of years to where the leader of the national Liberal Party changed four times in the space of two years or so. It happens within all political parties and is their right.

You may also want to look back to what the inflation and unemployment rates were for the majority of the Howard years and compare them to now. Don't forget that Labor have also had to bring Australia back from the GFC. For the first time in many a decade, Australia's economy is now performing better than any other western nation.
Cheers

[straight talker]

Is that the way Juliar got in was it?? How about Weatherall in Adelaide when he comes out of hiding and takes over from rann?

Prime Minister Juliar Gillard
Minister Jay Weatherill

learn to faarking spell ...

ha ha ha STIG you shouldnt throw stones in glass houses there champ!! JULIAR ??? so your obviously thinking what most australians are!!! go back to school and learn how to spell you Du$F...........

[dedja]

well done, you passed the test ...

[straight talker]

well done, you passed the test ...

yes riteo its good to see what you really think of the red hen good work. you cant spell either champ........

[straight talker]

bulldog you tell me what the position of the country was when howard and co took over from Labor?? And what was the position of the country when Kevin 07 took over??

[dedja]

well done, you passed the test ...

yes riteo its good to see what you really think of the red hen good work. you cant spell either champ........

I know the difference between there, their and they're ... I know that long sentences need commas ... I know I have a university edumacation and you don't

[bulldogproud2]

bulldog you tell me what the position of the country was when howard and co took over from Labor?? And what was the position of the country when Kevin 07 took over??

ST, one thing I will tell you is that Howard and Costello invested very little into the infrastructure of Australia, making it very difficult to sustain growth. This was a huge error that no government should ever have made.

[straight talker]

bulldog you tell me what the position of the country was when howard and co took over from Labor?? And what was the position of the country when Kevin 07 took over??

ST, one thing I will tell you is that Howard and Costello invested very little into the infrastructure of Australia, making it very difficult to sustain growth. This was a huge error that no government should ever have made.

so i take it you are telling me the country was in a lot better condition when they left compared to when they took over and NOW??

[bulldogproud2]

bulldog you tell me what the position of the country was when howard and co took over from Labor?? And what was the position of the country when Kevin 07 took over??

ST, one thing I will tell you is that Howard and Costello invested very little into the infrastructure of Australia, making it very difficult to sustain growth. This was a huge error that no government should ever have made.

so i take it you are telling me the country was in a lot better condition when they left compared to when they took over and NOW??

As we have just gone through a Global Financial Crisis, I think that the only way you can fully judge this is to compare Australia against other economies. There is no western country that is in a better position today than prior to the GFC. However, Australia has done extremely well in managing the impact of it, pretty much better than any other western country. As Tony Abbott admitted at the time, if a Liberal Government had been in power at the time of the GFC, we would have faced a number of years of double-digit unemployment. Under the Labor government, unemployment never got beyond 6%. Abbott himself conceded that the Liberal Party could not have managed the economy as well as Labor.

[Gozu]

ive had enough of the capitalist pigs sinking the boots into unions and the labor party so heres you chance to get on the front foot and unload against the right wingers(whingers)

Some of the recent Labor Governments we have had have been the best promoters of Right Wing politics and Capatalism mate, well over and above the Liberal party, in fact in areas of Privatisation of Government services for the profits to be made by wealthy board members the Liberals could likely learn quite a bit from the ALP! Why did the Liberal Party in this state not go through the Public Housing Stock like a Bag of Epsom salts as the ALP have and got rid of the responsibility of public housing from the role of the government? Wealthy Private Landlords must be absolutely rubbing there hands together - why not vote for the ALP then if it goes your way like that all the time?

Very true.

[straight talker]

bulldog you tell me what the position of the country was when howard and co took over from Labor?? And what was the position of the country when Kevin 07 took over??

ST, one thing I will tell you is that Howard and Costello invested very little into the infrastructure of Australia, making it very difficult to sustain growth. This was a huge error that no government should ever have made.

so i take it you are telling me the country was in a lot better condition when they left compared to when they took over and NOW??

As we have just gone through a Global Financial Crisis, I think that the only way you can fully judge this is to compare Australia against other economies. There is no western country that is in a better position today than prior to the GFC. However, Australia has done extremely well in managing the impact of it, pretty much better than any other western country. As Tony Abbott admitted at the time, if a Liberal Government had been in power at the time of the GFC, we would have faced a number of years of double-digit unemployment. Under the Labor government, unemployment never got beyond 6%. Abbott himself conceded that the Liberal Party could not have managed the economy as well as Labor.

AND the position of australia when the libs took over from Labor was??? When the labor government took over from howard and co the country was in a lot better condition with a good surplus correct??

[Gozu]

bulldog you tell me what the position of the country was when howard and co took over from Labor?? And what was the position of the country when Kevin 07 took over??

Keating left Howard with a budget surplus yeah?

Interesting read st, goes a bit beyond glib shock jock statements so...

"ALP best manager of money, history shows":

WAYNE Swan is a tougher Treasurer than Peter Costello was in the final term of the Howard government, when the massive proceeds of the first mining boom were being passed on to voters as generous handouts.

If Labor were spending at the same rate as the Coalition was then, the budget would be heading for a deficit of more than $20 billion in 2012-13, rather than a surplus of $3.5bn.

New analysis of fiscal policy going back to the 1970s contains a shock for voters who generally rate the Coalition as the better economic manager.

In fact, Labor treasurers have been more frugal, with Paul Keating the only treasurer to cut government spending in real terms, when the economy was growing in the second half of the 1980s.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nationa ... 6056371414