She'd be your new poster girl wouldn't she.

by Leaping Lindner » Fri Jul 02, 2010 7:14 pm
by Psyber » Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:27 am
She might be if we thought it would last, but what does she [or her backers] have in mind if she wins an election and can claim, "We have a mandate from the people!"Leaping Lindner wrote:Gees. You Lib voters should love Julia. She has shown in the past 3 days that mining companies STILL run the country AND she is anti gay marriage.
She'd be your new poster girl wouldn't she.
by redandblack » Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:31 am
by Psyber » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:33 pm
I was merely suggesting that she was presented as a "red" left winger by the Libs during the 2007 campaign because of her union affiliations.redandblack wrote:Even with a smiley, 'Julia the Red' takes us back to the heady days of years ago, Psyber.
Remember when the Communists were coming down through Vietnam to get us
by redandblack » Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:23 pm
by Psyber » Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:37 am
Because you seemed to ignore mine I assumed yours didn't mean anything - and you'd responded similarly in another thread, earlier, which added to the effect.redandblack wrote:You think my post was too earnest, even with the wink![]()
I think you’re being a bit too earnest, mate![]()
![]()
![]()
by Leaping Lindner » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:07 pm
by Magpiespower » Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:36 am
Leaping Lindner wrote:If things keep up at this rate she would have found God, married her partner and adopted a baby by the time the election comes.
by mick » Wed Jul 07, 2010 10:54 am
by Psyber » Wed Jul 07, 2010 10:58 am
She is, and it does seem a bit strange given her longer term affiliations with the left of the party.Magpiespower wrote:LL, surely you're not suggesting she's "lurching to the right?"Leaping Lindner wrote:If things keep up at this rate she would have found God, married her partner and adopted a baby by the time the election comes.
by redandblack » Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:13 am
by Psyber » Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:00 pm
They do, but I think to a lesser extent because they are not quite as scary to the middle ground of voters most of the time.redandblack wrote:And Liberal politicians don't do that, Psyber?
by redandblack » Sun Feb 13, 2011 8:49 am
by Psyber » Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:33 am
Bugger! I don't own any Rio Tinto shares...redandblack wrote:I've changed my mind and am now against this.
I was upset that Rio Tinto's profit only rose from 5 billion to 13 billion for the year.
Gillard's tax will destroy companies like these.
by dedja » Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:39 am
by Psyber » Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:48 am
Yes , I thought about whether to buy when they were down, then I waited to see how the BHP takeover bid went...dedja wrote:Just as well, they're still around half of their high from a couple of years ago ...
by Leaping Lindner » Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:39 pm
Psyber wrote:Yes , I thought about whether to buy when they were down, then I waited to see how the BHP takeover bid went...dedja wrote:Just as well, they're still around half of their high from a couple of years ago ...
by Psyber » Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:25 pm
Dunno - I've never been a member.Leaping Lindner wrote: What's the word from the Adelaide club ? Surely the North Terrace boys are on top of this.
by Leaping Lindner » Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:06 am
Psyber wrote:Dunno - I've never been a member.Leaping Lindner wrote: What's the word from the Adelaide club ? Surely the North Terrace boys are on top of this.
I also turned down the SACA when my name (put down in my childhood) came up, and never bothered to sit MENSA's tests...
by redandblack » Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:19 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |