by Psyber » Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:24 pm
by overloaded » Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:44 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by mick » Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:51 pm
Gozu wrote:If only The Advertiser had more journalists like Tory Shepherd:
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/stor ... 01,00.html
by aceman » Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:53 pm
overloaded wrote:I was amused during Rann's press conference yesterday when Mike Smithson (I think) [b]asked him if he had been trufthfull at all times regarding the matter (or[/b] something to that effect) to which he replied with an answer to a completely different question. Not one of the journo's pointed out that he didnt answer the question, he has their bluff and they are scared of him.
by Dogwatcher » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:06 pm
overloaded wrote: Not one of the journo's pointed out that he didnt answer the question, he has their bluff and they are scared of him.
by Gozu » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:13 pm
Psyber wrote:Agreed Gozu and SS, a balanced and sound summation.
The basic issue is whether or not we, the voters, like the way he is running the state.
I haven't been back here long enough to have a strong opinion on that...
The team from the desalination plant answered my questions about brine dispersal satisfactorily, assuming what they said was true.
I'm unsure which is the best choice for the RAH, and haven't worked out whether the inconvenience of trams in North Terrace has enough balancing benefit..
by Dogwatcher » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:20 pm
by interested observer » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:27 pm
Gozu wrote:Psyber wrote:Agreed Gozu and SS, a balanced and sound summation.
The basic issue is whether or not we, the voters, like the way he is running the state.
I haven't been back here long enough to have a strong opinion on that...
The team from the desalination plant answered my questions about brine dispersal satisfactorily, assuming what they said was true.
I'm unsure which is the best choice for the RAH, and haven't worked out whether the inconvenience of trams in North Terrace has enough balancing benefit..
This is off topic and although I admit I haven't given the whole trams thing the greatest attention but can anyone explain the point of having a tram line running down Port Rd almost alongside the train line? If the trains already cover the route and the train line is currently being upgraded what is the point of the trams?
by Jimmy_041 » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:55 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:I enjoyed that editorial.
by Gozu » Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:57 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:I said to a mate today - a couple of months ago, who would have thought they would be in a tizz
by southee » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:00 pm
interested observer wrote:Gozu wrote:Psyber wrote:Agreed Gozu and SS, a balanced and sound summation.
The basic issue is whether or not we, the voters, like the way he is running the state.
I haven't been back here long enough to have a strong opinion on that...
The team from the desalination plant answered my questions about brine dispersal satisfactorily, assuming what they said was true.
I'm unsure which is the best choice for the RAH, and haven't worked out whether the inconvenience of trams in North Terrace has enough balancing benefit..
This is off topic and although I admit I haven't given the whole trams thing the greatest attention but can anyone explain the point of having a tram line running down Port Rd almost alongside the train line? If the trains already cover the route and the train line is currently being upgraded what is the point of the trams?
Not quite the route we are covering here...
by Dogwatcher » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:01 pm
by southee » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:04 pm
Gozu wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:I said to a mate today - a couple of months ago, who would have thought they would be in a tizz
Exactly which is why I think this whole thing is politically motivated.
by Dog_ger » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:09 pm
by Gozu » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:18 pm
southee wrote:Gozu wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:I said to a mate today - a couple of months ago, who would have thought they would be in a tizz
Exactly which is why I think this whole thing is politically motivated.
You would Gozu!!!! Dont think the majority of the public do though!!!
by Dog_ger » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:20 pm
by Dogwatcher » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:21 pm
by Dog_ger » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:24 pm
Dog_ger wrote:The bikies made a pact to bring Rann down.
The plot thickens.
by Psyber » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:32 pm
by Dog_ger » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |