by Hondo » Mon Dec 12, 2011 11:13 am
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Dec 12, 2011 11:20 am
southee wrote:SJABC wrote:tipper wrote:interesting, i found a link stating what soj did, according to the Australian, Harley was moving their operations to China. i dare say this was written first, and then corrected by the time the other outlets released their storys, hence the line in the aelaide now article "not China as speculation had it". So unless Soj writes for the Australian, he didnt make it up.....
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nationa ... 6217645580
That's BULLSHIT! How dare you provide something that could show up certain posters as being wrong....
Shame on you....
How dare you prove them wrong .......Q, R&B ???? Over to you
by tipper » Mon Dec 12, 2011 11:26 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Dec 12, 2011 11:31 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:southee wrote:SJABC wrote:tipper wrote:interesting, i found a link stating what soj did, according to the Australian, Harley was moving their operations to China. i dare say this was written first, and then corrected by the time the other outlets released their storys, hence the line in the aelaide now article "not China as speculation had it". So unless Soj writes for the Australian, he didnt make it up.....
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nationa ... 6217645580
That's BULLSHIT! How dare you provide something that could show up certain posters as being wrong....
Shame on you....
How dare you prove them wrong .......Q, R&B ???? Over to you
But it was in a Newscorp publication and they dont count The Australian as a credible newspaper - hence it never happened
NOW - if it was in Crikey - that's a different story - the only credible news outlet in the nation
by southee » Mon Dec 12, 2011 11:37 am
by redandblack » Mon Dec 12, 2011 11:45 am
southee wrote:SJABC wrote:tipper wrote:interesting, i found a link stating what soj did, according to the Australian, Harley was moving their operations to China. i dare say this was written first, and then corrected by the time the other outlets released their storys, hence the line in the aelaide now article "not China as speculation had it". So unless Soj writes for the Australian, he didnt make it up.....
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nationa ... 6217645580
That's BULLSHIT! How dare you provide something that could show up certain posters as being wrong....
Shame on you....
How dare you prove them wrong .......Q, R&B ???? Over to you
by Q. » Mon Dec 12, 2011 11:48 am
Sojourner wrote:Again that is what I heard reported on 5AA, I could not care less if people think I made it up or whatever. I would however like some examples from Quichey if that is what he/she has "come to expect"....
by Q. » Mon Dec 12, 2011 11:51 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:southee wrote:How dare you prove them wrong .......Q, R&B ???? Over to you
But it was in a Newscorp publication and they dont count The Australian as a credible newspaper - hence it never happened
NOW - if it was in Crikey - that's a different story - the only credible news outlet in the nation
My thoughts exactly. I see Quichey is quite happy to put up a link from the MSM if it helps his point scoring. ;-)
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:19 pm
Quichey wrote:Sojourner wrote:Again that is what I heard reported on 5AA, I could not care less if people think I made it up or whatever. I would however like some examples from Quichey if that is what he/she has "come to expect"....
Actually, I apologise for having a go at you directly. You know what they say about assumptions...
by Q. » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:29 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Quichey wrote:Sojourner wrote:Again that is what I heard reported on 5AA, I could not care less if people think I made it up or whatever. I would however like some examples from Quichey if that is what he/she has "come to expect"....
Actually, I apologise for having a go at you directly. You know what they say about assumptions...
Perfectly acceptable on this forum mate (even from a Mod - precedent set before your appointment)
by Sojourner » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:30 pm
Quichey wrote:Sojourner wrote:Again that is what I heard reported on 5AA, I could not care less if people think I made it up or whatever. I would however like some examples from Quichey if that is what he/she has "come to expect"....
Actually, I apologise for having a go at you directly. You know what they say about assumptions...
by Sojourner » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:33 pm
Hondo wrote:What about the connection that Soj made in his OP about the carbon tax. He implied that was a direct link between the carbon tax and the decision made at Castallow. Is there a link for that?
by Hondo » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:58 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Dec 12, 2011 3:52 pm
Quichey wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Quichey wrote:Sojourner wrote:Again that is what I heard reported on 5AA, I could not care less if people think I made it up or whatever. I would however like some examples from Quichey if that is what he/she has "come to expect"....
Actually, I apologise for having a go at you directly. You know what they say about assumptions...
Perfectly acceptable on this forum mate (even from a Mod - precedent set before your appointment)
Even Mods are human too, Jimmy
by tipper » Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:25 am
by redandblack » Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:48 am
by Sojourner » Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:01 am
smac wrote:Sojo is Kevin Foley!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |