Point of Principle

Looking for some genuine answers to a tricky question.
Scenario is this:
A Grade coach asks the football director to go with him to interview a possible recruit. At short notice the A Grade Coach can’t make it, so seconds the B Grade Coach to attend.
Player lives 100 kms from the interviewing club, so agree to meet half way. Logical place was a pub as it was a dinner time meeting, and of course the club can’t appear to be ‘tight fisted’ to the prospective player.
The UNPAID football director pays for the meal (1 course only, nice but basic, just under $60.00 all up) and gets a receipt from the pub to lodge with the club.
Aside from the 3.5 hours out of his time, the $20.00 in petrol and the $30.00 for the two rounds of drinks he bought – the football director submitted the receipt for the meal only, but it was declined with the statement in the vein of “it was not a genuine football expense”.
Question of principle: Should the club reimburse the unpaid football director for the meal?
Scenario is this:
A Grade coach asks the football director to go with him to interview a possible recruit. At short notice the A Grade Coach can’t make it, so seconds the B Grade Coach to attend.
Player lives 100 kms from the interviewing club, so agree to meet half way. Logical place was a pub as it was a dinner time meeting, and of course the club can’t appear to be ‘tight fisted’ to the prospective player.
The UNPAID football director pays for the meal (1 course only, nice but basic, just under $60.00 all up) and gets a receipt from the pub to lodge with the club.
Aside from the 3.5 hours out of his time, the $20.00 in petrol and the $30.00 for the two rounds of drinks he bought – the football director submitted the receipt for the meal only, but it was declined with the statement in the vein of “it was not a genuine football expense”.
Question of principle: Should the club reimburse the unpaid football director for the meal?