by woodublieve12 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:21 pm
by Bulldogs007 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:26 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Has pfcc shown signs of improving???
by Jabber » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:14 pm
Bulldogs007 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Has pfcc shown signs of improving???
Very young side mate, oldest player in the side is Giersch at 36? then it is 24. Still have a long long way to go but showing good signs of improvement. Still a concern the batting but bowling and fielding is really good. I think if we where to get two good consistant batters we would be up there.
by Jabber » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:18 pm
by The Hound » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:29 pm
by Jabber » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:32 pm
The Hound wrote:Jabber - I believe that each club will receive a player from Southern Districts who has had a connection to that club at a junior/senior level.
Prizes for fastest 50, most wickets etc.
by woodublieve12 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:53 pm
Jabber wrote:Yeah for the majority of the season thus far the eldest bloke is debrowski, at 24/25? great signs for the years to come. I think there has been an improvement but batting still lets the boys down a bit, but with experience comes consistency when you have good young players coming through and thats what i think we have here.
Plympton will be controling things that they can control, dont you worry about that.
I'll have $50 on a Section 1 PFCC premiership before a Division 1 PFC premiership...Bulldogs007 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Has pfcc shown signs of improving???
Very young side mate, oldest player in the side is Giersch at 36? then it is 24. Still have a long long way to go but showing good signs of improvement. Still a concern the batting but bowling and fielding is really good. I think if we where to get two good consistant batters we would be up there.
by woodublieve12 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:57 pm
Jabber wrote:Really? What a good idea.The Hound wrote:Jabber - I believe that each club will receive a player from Southern Districts who has had a connection to that club at a junior/senior level.
Prizes for fastest 50, most wickets etc.
by lion heart » Fri Dec 17, 2010 5:26 pm
by CoverKing » Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:33 pm
Westsider wrote:What about Brad Christie?
by OSB RD. » Sun Dec 19, 2010 3:31 am
by CoverKing » Sun Dec 19, 2010 3:42 am
by OSB RD. » Sun Dec 19, 2010 3:59 am
CoverKing wrote:South road way too good! I wouldn't say you nearly knocked us off outright though, considering your mob never had a crack and that was evident when you wanted to call it off at the end of the first innings! Maggot bowled well, peto was a bit inconsistent but Bowles enough wicket balls.
One thing we found staggering with south road was the lack of running between wickets, was terrible. Never looked for two or three's at all. Was rather weird.
Overall both sides batting was terrible and both sides bowling was good, with SR's having a great individual performance. Well played lads, too good.
Willson gets bowled by m. Whenan very unlucky though, turns around and hits stump with bat. Umpire says "I understand why he did it with that kind of dismissal as I woulda done the same thing' .. Precedent set with Tony now onwards
by chewbacka » Sun Dec 19, 2010 9:45 am
by storyoftheyear » Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:17 am
chewbacka wrote:what shouldve been an easy win turned out to be a tough battle and ended with a dubious umpiring decision yesterday
by chewbacka » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:53 am
by Gowser » Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:19 pm
chewbacka wrote:what shouldve been an easy win turned out to be a tough battle and ended with a dubious umpiring decision yesterday
by Newsbreaker » Sun Dec 19, 2010 6:57 pm
by wycbloods » Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:43 am
OSB RD. wrote:CoverKing wrote:South road way too good! I wouldn't say you nearly knocked us off outright though, considering your mob never had a crack and that was evident when you wanted to call it off at the end of the first innings! Maggot bowled well, peto was a bit inconsistent but Bowles enough wicket balls.
One thing we found staggering with south road was the lack of running between wickets, was terrible. Never looked for two or three's at all. Was rather weird.
Overall both sides batting was terrible and both sides bowling was good, with SR's having a great individual performance. Well played lads, too good.
Willson gets bowled by m. Whenan very unlucky though, turns around and hits stump with bat. Umpire says "I understand why he did it with that kind of dismissal as I woulda done the same thing' .. Precedent set with Tony now onwards
We wanted to finish as soon as we had won cause we couldn't see an outright result happening but u blokes wanted to stay on. We set u blokes 160 off 22 overs and the fact we had u 7/80 would say that we did in fact 'nearly' beat u outright.
Couldn't help but laugh when Tony told us about the situation with Willo and how it was 'inappropriate' considering some of the garbage he had to put up with from the wyc skipper early in our 2nd dig.
by Amateur Footy » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:24 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |