by The Big Shrek » Sun Feb 17, 2013 8:24 pm
by Trader » Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:16 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:I hear Kylie Parks slapped 125 of 60 odd balls Saturday. Most talented player in the comp?
by azzaisbest » Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:37 pm
Trader wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:I hear Kylie Parks slapped 125 of 60 odd balls Saturday. Most talented player in the comp?
When you say comp do you mean B3 or the entire Turf comp?
In either case I'd answer no.
by helicopterking » Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:26 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:43 am
Merki the God wrote:Could you imagine if myself, hashtag and lordrocco all joined forces to pick on one paricular forumite?? The mods wouldn't let it happen. Yet three mods have joined forces to have a go at hashtag and nothing happens.
It seems like us forum users need to form some sort of "union", to prevent such harrassment from our "employers".
by mickey » Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:12 am
by lordrocco18 » Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:52 am
The Big Shrek wrote:I hear Kylie Parks slapped 125 of 60 odd balls Saturday. Most talented player in the comp?
by whufc » Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:58 am
lordrocco18 wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:I hear Kylie Parks slapped 125 of 60 odd balls Saturday. Most talented player in the comp?
lol I think that's the worst comment I have ever heard you must be on smack. a guy playing b 3 or whatever the f... use play most talented player in the comp extremely disrespectful to all the extremely talented and skilled players in premier grade grade 2 and grade 3 and the other guns through the lower grades Jamie Jarrett has done that twice this year 100 off 40 odd balls in grade 2 let alone all the great efforts by players in premier grade. my advice to you is to stay away from the kdf club cause whatever your smoking is messing with you brain.
by OKC! » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:35 am
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:42 am
mickey wrote:Who says you have to support anyone to have an opinion?
by rainbow warrior » Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:44 am
OKC! wrote:We had a LBW turned down on the weekend, umpire said it was smashing into off middle, but it pitched outside off stump so it couldn't be out regardless of whether it would have been hitting or not. No wonder people get reported when they dribble shit like that...how do these guys keep getting umpiring gigs??
by Trader » Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:20 am
OKC! wrote:We had a LBW turned down on the weekend, umpire said it was smashing into off middle, but it pitched outside off stump so it couldn't be out regardless of whether it would have been hitting or not. No wonder people get reported when they dribble shit like that...how do these guys keep getting umpiring gigs??
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:29 am
Trader wrote:OKC! wrote:We had a LBW turned down on the weekend, umpire said it was smashing into off middle, but it pitched outside off stump so it couldn't be out regardless of whether it would have been hitting or not. No wonder people get reported when they dribble shit like that...how do these guys keep getting umpiring gigs??
Agreed there are some average umpires getting around.
A lot of the problems aren't corrected as teams/captains don't provide appropriate feedback on the umpires report card in mycricket.
Often you hear stories of clubs just putting down 2,2,2,2,2,2,2 all the way cause they weren't happy with an umpire. Or all 5s thinking sucking up will get them favorable decisions in the future. This provides no feedback for the umpires association to use to improve the umpires we get stuck with each round.
It is far more effective if you take the 30 seconds to put an appropriate number in each slot. If the umpire struggles with LBW, then give him a 2 for that and 4s elsewhere. The comment section is important and make sure what you enter is constructive. IE: Umpire didn't know the LBW law (said it was not out cause it pitched outside off), rather than umpire didn't give us any LBWs but gave 3 of our guys out.
It is also just as important to report it when you get a favourable decision, as these can be trusted more as they don't have any bias in your side of the story!
by heater31 » Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:18 pm
Trader wrote:OKC! wrote:We had a LBW turned down on the weekend, umpire said it was smashing into off middle, but it pitched outside off stump so it couldn't be out regardless of whether it would have been hitting or not. No wonder people get reported when they dribble shit like that...how do these guys keep getting umpiring gigs??
Agreed there are some average umpires getting around.
A lot of the problems aren't corrected as teams/captains don't provide appropriate feedback on the umpires report card in mycricket.
Often you hear stories of clubs just putting down 2,2,2,2,2,2,2 all the way cause they weren't happy with an umpire. Or all 5s thinking sucking up will get them favorable decisions in the future. This provides no feedback for the umpires association to use to improve the umpires we get stuck with each round.
It is far more effective if you take the 30 seconds to put an appropriate number in each slot. If the umpire struggles with LBW, then give him a 2 for that and 4s elsewhere. The comment section is important and make sure what you enter is constructive. IE: Umpire didn't know the LBW law (said it was not out cause it pitched outside off), rather than umpire didn't give us any LBWs but gave 3 of our guys out.
It is also just as important to report it when you get a favourable decision, as these can be trusted more as they don't have any bias in your side of the story!
by OKC! » Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:03 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Trader wrote:OKC! wrote:We had a LBW turned down on the weekend, umpire said it was smashing into off middle, but it pitched outside off stump so it couldn't be out regardless of whether it would have been hitting or not. No wonder people get reported when they dribble shit like that...how do these guys keep getting umpiring gigs??
Agreed there are some average umpires getting around.
A lot of the problems aren't corrected as teams/captains don't provide appropriate feedback on the umpires report card in mycricket.
Often you hear stories of clubs just putting down 2,2,2,2,2,2,2 all the way cause they weren't happy with an umpire. Or all 5s thinking sucking up will get them favorable decisions in the future. This provides no feedback for the umpires association to use to improve the umpires we get stuck with each round.
It is far more effective if you take the 30 seconds to put an appropriate number in each slot. If the umpire struggles with LBW, then give him a 2 for that and 4s elsewhere. The comment section is important and make sure what you enter is constructive. IE: Umpire didn't know the LBW law (said it was not out cause it pitched outside off), rather than umpire didn't give us any LBWs but gave 3 of our guys out.
It is also just as important to report it when you get a favourable decision, as these can be trusted more as they don't have any bias in your side of the story!
Very valid point there, it's not to be on the good end of a howler but I'd prefer the right decisions getting made for both sides.
by OKC! » Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:05 pm
heater31 wrote:Trader wrote:OKC! wrote:We had a LBW turned down on the weekend, umpire said it was smashing into off middle, but it pitched outside off stump so it couldn't be out regardless of whether it would have been hitting or not. No wonder people get reported when they dribble shit like that...how do these guys keep getting umpiring gigs??
Agreed there are some average umpires getting around.
A lot of the problems aren't corrected as teams/captains don't provide appropriate feedback on the umpires report card in mycricket.
Often you hear stories of clubs just putting down 2,2,2,2,2,2,2 all the way cause they weren't happy with an umpire. Or all 5s thinking sucking up will get them favorable decisions in the future. This provides no feedback for the umpires association to use to improve the umpires we get stuck with each round.
It is far more effective if you take the 30 seconds to put an appropriate number in each slot. If the umpire struggles with LBW, then give him a 2 for that and 4s elsewhere. The comment section is important and make sure what you enter is constructive. IE: Umpire didn't know the LBW law (said it was not out cause it pitched outside off), rather than umpire didn't give us any LBWs but gave 3 of our guys out.
It is also just as important to report it when you get a favourable decision, as these can be trusted more as they don't have any bias in your side of the story!
Problem is if you take the time to fill these out correctly more often than not nothing is done about the poor decisions.
Does someone even look at them each week???
by Merki the God » Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:22 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Merki the God wrote:Could you imagine if myself, hashtag and lordrocco all joined forces to pick on one paricular forumite?? The mods wouldn't let it happen. Yet three mods have joined forces to have a go at hashtag and nothing happens.
It seems like us forum users need to form some sort of "union", to prevent such harrassment from our "employers".
Go for it mate, the mods don't get paid and aim to and try to keep discussion topic related. Friendly banter is fine, trolling isn't. Hashtags are for twitter, not here, your input is little more than taking the occasional pot shot at someone anyway so it's water off a ducks back, you don't even have the balls to say who you support.
Have a nice day.
by Merki the God » Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:23 pm
by Trader » Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:28 pm
by beeroclock » Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:03 pm
Merki the God wrote:Sneaky tickle to fine leg to bring up the 300!! A swashbuckling triple ton as well!!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |